Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 4.113 refers to a survey used to assess the ignorance of the public to global population trends. A similar survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, where respondents were asked if they had a university degree. One question asked, "In the last 20 years the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty has \(\ldots, "\) and three choices 2) "remained more or were provided: 1\()^{\text {6i }}\) increased" less the same," and 3) "decreased." Of 373 university degree holders, 45 responded with the correct answer: decreased; of 639 non-degree respondents, 57 responded with the correct answer. \({ }^{35}\) We would like to test if the percent of correct answers is significantly different between degree holders and non- degree holders. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using StatKey or other technology, construct a randomization distribution and compute the p-value. (c) State the conclusion in context.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solutions to the exercise are: \n(a) Null hypothesis (H0): p1 = p2. Alternative hypothesis (Ha): p1 ≠ p2.\n(b) To get the p-value, first establish the observed difference between the two proportions. Then, generate a randomization distribution and find the proportion of simulated differences that are as considerable as, or more significant than, the observed difference. This is the p-value. \n(c) The conclusion will depend on the calculated p-value and should be stated in context of the problem.

Step by step solution

01

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

To solve this problem, begin by understanding the scenario and formulating the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there's no difference in the percent of correct answers between degree and non-degree holders. So, H0: p1 = p2, where p1 is the proportion of degree holders who gave the correct answer and p2 is the proportion of non-degree holders who gave the correct answer. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there is a significant difference in the percentage of correct answers between degree and non-degree holders. So, Ha: p1 ≠ p2.
02

Construct a Randomization Distribution

To construct the randomization distribution, the difference between the proportions of correct answers for both groups is required. The proportion of correct responses for degree holders is 45/373 = 0.1206, while the proportion for non-degree holders is 57/639 = 0.0892. The observed difference is 0.1206 - 0.0892 = 0.0314 (proportion for degree holders - proportion for non-degree holders). Using a statistical software or an online tool that performs randomization tests for two proportions, simulate several random samples sharing the same overall proportion of success as in the collected data. For each simulation, calculate and record the difference in proportion.
03

Compute the p-value

The p-value is the probability of obtaining the observed difference or a more substantial difference if the null hypothesis is true. Using the randomization distribution generated in the previous step, calculate the proportion of simulated differences that are at least as extreme as the observed difference of 0.0314. This proportion is the p-value. If using software, this computation is typically done automatically.
04

Conclusion

The conclusion depends on the calculated p-value. If p-value < α (commonly 0.05), reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the difference in proportions is statistically significant. On the other hand, if the p-value > α, not sufficient evidence is found to reject the null hypothesis. The conclusion needs to be stated in the context of the problem, i.e., there is/is no statistically significant difference in the percent of correct answers between degree holders and non-degree holders.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 4.59 to 4.64 give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=30 / 50=0.60\) with \(n=50\)

Polling 1000 people in a large community to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater then \(10 \%\).

Suppose you want to find out if reading speed is any different between a print book and an e-book. (a) Clearly describe how you might set up an experiment to test this. Give details. (b) Why is a hypothesis test valuable here? What additional information does a hypothesis test give us beyond the descriptive statistics we discuss in Chapter \(2 ?\) (c) Why is a confidence interval valuable here? What additional information does a confidence interval give us beyond the descriptive statistics of Chapter 2 and the results of a hypothesis test described in part (b)? (d) A similar study \(^{53}\) has been conducted, and reports that "the difference between Kindle and the book was significant at the \(p<.01\) level, and the difference between the iPad and the book was marginally significant at \(p=.06 . "\) The report also stated that "the iPad measured at \(6.2 \%\) slower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at \(10.7 \%\) slower than print. However, the difference between the two devices [iPad and Kindle] was not statistically significant because of the data's fairly high variability." Can you tell from the first quotation which method of reading (print or e-book) was faster in the sample or do you need the second quotation for that? Explain the results in your own words.

Testing 100 right-handed participants on the reaction time of their left and right hands to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the right hand reacts faster than the left.

Testing 50 people in a driving simulator to find the average reaction time to hit the brakes when an object is seen in the view ahead.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free