Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Student Misinterpretations Suppose that a student is working on a statistics project using data on pulse rates collected from a random sample of 100 students from her college. She finds a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for mean pulse rate to be (65.5,71.8) . Discuss how each of the statements below would indicate an improper interpretation of this interval. (a) I am \(95 \%\) sure that all students will have pulse rates between 65.5 and 71.8 beats per minute. (b) I am \(95 \%\) sure that the mean pulse rate for this sample of students will fall between 65.5 and 71.8 beats per minute. (c) I am 95\% sure that the confidence interval for the average pulse rate of all students at this college goes from 65.5 to 71.8 beats per minute. (d) I am sure that \(95 \%\) of all students at this college will have pulse rates between 65.5 and 71.8 beats per minute. (e) I am \(95 \%\) sure that the mean pulse rate for all US college students is between 65.5 and 71.8 beats per minute. (f) Of the mean pulse rates for students at this college, \(95 \%\) will fall between 65.5 and 71.8 beats per minute. (g) Of random samples of this size taken from students at this college, \(95 \%\) will have mean pulse rates between 65.5 and 71.8 beats per minute.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Each statement in the exercise is a common misinterpretation of the confidence interval due to misunderstanding of the definition and meaning of a confidence interval. The only statement that correctly understands the meaning of a 95% confidence interval in this context is statement (g).

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing Statement (a)

Statement (a) is incorrect because a confidence interval does not guarantee that all individuals in a population will have values within that interval. The confidence interval pertains to the estimation of the population mean, not individual measurements.
02

Analyzing Statement (b)

Statement (b) is incorrect because the mean pulse rate for the sample has already been calculated, and is the point estimate used to calculate the confidence interval. The confidence interval is for the population mean, not the sample mean.
03

Analyzing Statement (c)

Statement (c) is correct in stating that the interval pertains to a population mean (in this case, the mean pulse rate for all students at the college), but is incorrect in asserting a certainty of 95%. Confidence levels represent a frequency for a class of hypothetical replications, not a probability for a single fixed interval.
04

Analyzing Statement (d)

Statement (d) is incorrect because the confidence interval does not predict what percentage of the student’s pulse rates fall within that interval. Instead, it indicates where the true population mean is estimated to be, with a certain level of confidence.
05

Analyzing Statement (e)

Statement (e) is incorrect because the sample was only taken from her college. The interval cannot be used to make statements about the mean pulse rate for all US college studentss.
06

Analyzing Statement (f)

Statement (f) is incorrect. A confidence interval does not make statements about individual means falling within the interval, it estimates where the true population mean falls.
07

Analyzing Statement (g)

Statement (g) is correct. It appropriately interprets the concept of confidence intervals, saying that if we were to repeatedly draw samples and calculate confidence intervals, we would expect \(95 \%\) of those intervals to contain the population mean pulse rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Misinterpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals are a cornerstone of statistical analysis, yet they are often misconstrued, leading to misleading conclusions. A confidence interval gives an estimated range that is likely to contain the population mean, considering a specified confidence level, such as 95%. However, it's crucial to note that the true population parameter is fixed, and it’s our estimate that is subject to variability.

When a student claims to be '95% sure' that the mean or individual values fall within the confidence interval, they are walking into a common trap. Such statements suggest that the interval has a 95% probability of holding the true mean or individual values, which is incorrect. The '95%' refers to the method used to create the interval, indicating that if we took many samples and built intervals in the same manner, approximately 95% of them would capture the true population mean.
Population Mean Estimation
The purpose of estimating the population mean is to infer about a whole population from a sample statistic. The confidence interval uses the sample data to estimate where the true population mean lies. It's essential to recognize that the interval itself is based on the sample mean and the variability of the data, along with a margin of error. This margin reflects the sampling variability and the confidence level we've chosen.

For instance, stating the mean pulse rate for a sample of students will fall within a specific interval misinterprets the purpose, as the sample mean is a single point estimate. The interval estimates where the mean for all students, the population mean, is expected to lie. Obtaining a precise value for the population mean from a sample is not possible; hence, the interval provides a range for estimation.
Statistical Confidence Levels
Statistical confidence levels indicate how confident we can be in the methods used to estimate the population parameter. A '95% confidence level' does not mean there is a 95% probability of a specific outcome. Instead, it reflects the long-term frequency of confidence intervals that will contain the true population mean if the same study were repeated numerous times.

It's like a net catching fish – a '95% confidence net' won't be sure to catch any specific fish, but in the long run, it's constructed to catch the true 'fish' around 95 times out of 100. Misinterpreting this as a one-time probability overlooks how confidence levels actually function in statistics.
Sampling and Statistical Inference
Sampling is the process of selecting a subset from a larger population to estimate characteristics of the whole. Statistical inference then allows us to draw conclusions about that population. This is where the concept of a 'random sample' is fundamental. It ensures that every individual in the population has an equal chance of being included, which helps in generalizing the results to the broader population.

However, it is essential to clarify that even a well-conducted sample can have limitations in inference. For example, the interval estimated from one college's students cannot be generalized to all US college students, as the particular sample may not represent the larger student body adequately. Assumptions, variability, and potential biases must be considered when extending findings from a sample to a larger group.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Average Penalty Minutes in the NHL In Exercise 3.102 on page \(241,\) we construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for mean penalty minutes given to NHL players in a season using data from players on the Ottawa Senators as our sample. Some percentiles from a bootstrap distribution of 5000 sample means are shown in Table 3.13. Use this information to find and interpret a \(98 \%\) confidence interval for the mean penalty minutes of NHL players. Assume that the players on this team are a reasonable sample from the population of all players.

SKILL BUILDER 1 In Exercises 3.41 to \(3.44,\) data from a sample is being used to estimate something about a population. In each case: (a) Give notation for the quantity that is being estimated. (b) Give notation for the quantity that gives the best estimate. A random sample of registered voters in the US is used to estimate the proportion of all US registered voters who voted in the last election.

Use data from a study designed to examine the effect of doing synchronized movements (such as marching in step or doing synchronized dance steps) and the effect of exertion on many different variables, such as pain tolerance and attitudes toward others. In the study, 264 high school students in Brazil were randomly assigned to one of four groups reflecting whether or not movements were synchronized (Synch= yes or no) and level of activity (Exertion= high or low). \(^{49}\) Participants rated how close they felt to others in their group both before (CloseBefore) and after (CloseAfter) the activity, using a 7-point scale (1=least close to \(7=\) most close ). Participants also had their pain tolerance measured using pressure from a blood pressure cuff, by indicating when the pressure became too uncomfortable (up to a maximum pressure of \(300 \mathrm{mmHg}\) ). Higher numbers for this Pain Tolerance measure indicate higher pain tolerance. The full dataset is available in SynchronizedMovement. For each of the following problems: (a) Give notation for the quantity we are estimating, and define any relevant parameters. (b) Use StatKey or other technology to find the value of the sample statistic. Give the correct notation with your answer. (c) Use StatKey or other technology to find the standard error for the estimate. (d) Use the standard error to give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the quantity we are estimating. (e) Interpret the confidence interval in context. Does Synchronization Boost Pain Tolerance? Use the pain tolerance ratings ( PainTolerance) after the activity to estimate the difference in mean pain tolerance between those who just completed a synchronized activity and those who did a nonsynchronized activity.

In Exercises 3.49 and 3.50 , a \(95 \%\) confidence interval is given, followed by possible values of the population parameter. Indicate which of the values are plausible values for the parameter and which are not. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for a mean is 112.1 to \(128.2 .\) Is the value given a plausible value of \(\mu ?\) (a) \(\mu=121\) (b) \(\mu=113.4\) (c) \(\mu=105.3\)

Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 consider the question (using fish) of whether uncommitted members of a group make it more democratic. It has been argued that individuals with weak preferences are particularly vulnerable to a vocal opinionated minority. However, recent studies, including computer simulations, observational studies with humans, and experiments with fish, all suggest that adding uncommitted members to a group might make for more democratic decisions by taking control away from an opinionated minority. \({ }^{36}\) In the experiment with fish, golden shiners (small freshwater fish who have a very strong tendency to stick together in schools) were trained to swim toward either yellow or blue marks to receive a treat. Those swimming toward the yellow mark were trained more to develop stronger preferences and became the fish version of individuals with strong opinions. When a minority of five opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the yellow mark) were mixed with a majority of six less opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the blue mark), the group swam toward the minority yellow mark almost all the time. When some untrained fish with no prior preferences were added, however, the majority opinion prevailed most of the time. \({ }^{37}\) Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 elaborate on this study. Training Fish to Pick a Color Fish can be trained quite easily. With just seven days of training, golden shiner fish learn to pick a color (yellow or blue) to receive a treat, and the fish will swim to that color immediately. On the first day of training, however, it takes them some time. In the study described under Fish Democracies above, the mean time for the fish in the study to reach the yellow mark is \(\bar{x}=51\) seconds with a standard error for this statistic of 2.4 . Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean time it takes a golden shiner fish to reach the yellow mark. Is it plausible that the average time it takes fish to find the mark is 60 seconds? Is it plausible that it is 55 seconds?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free