Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Number of Text Messages a Day A random sample of \(n=755\) US cell phone users age 18 and older in May 2011 found that the average number of text messages sent or received per day is 41.5 messages, 32 with standard error about \(6.1 .\) (a) State the population and parameter of interest. Use the information from the sample to give the best estimate of the population parameter. (b) Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean number of text messages.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The population of interest is all US cell phone users aged 18 and older, and the parameter of interest is the average number of text messages sent or received per day. Using the data from the sample of 755 users, the best estimate of the population parameter is 41.5 messages. The 95% confidence interval is calculated as roughly [29.74, 53.26]. That means we are 95% confident that the true average number of text messages sent or received per day by all US cell phone users aged 18 and older is within approximately 29.74 and 53.26.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the population and parameter of the interest

The population of interest refers to all the people or items that the statistics are about. In this case, the population consists of all US cell phone users aged 18 and older. The parameter of interest is the average number of text messages sent or received per day. The best estimate of the population parameter is the sample mean, which here amounts to 41.5 messages.
02

Calculation of the Confidence Interval

The formula of a confidence interval is \(\widehat{p} \pm Z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{\widehat{p} (1 - \widehat{p})}{n}}\) where \(\widehat{p}\) is the sample proportion, \(Z\) is the z-value (for a 95% confidence interval, this value is 1.96), and \(n\) is the sample size. Using the data gathered, the confidence interval is calculated as 41.5 ± (1.96 × 6.1).
03

Interpretation of the Confidence Interval

Once the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are calculated, these need to be interpreted in the context of the problem. For instance, based on the calculations, we are 95% confident that the true number of text messages sent or received per day by all US cell phone users aged 18 and older falls within this interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Parameter
When we talk about the population parameter, we're referring to a specific characteristic or measure of an entire group. For instance, the average height of all adults in a city, the average temperature of a region over a year, or, as in our exercise, the average number of text messages sent or received per day by all US cell phone users aged 18 and older.

Understanding the population parameter is crucial because it gives us insight into the entire group we are studying without having to check every single member. However, it's often impractical or impossible to measure the population parameter directly due to the large number of individuals. Therefore, statisticians use a sample—a manageable size group representing the larger population—to estimate the population parameter.

In the given exercise, the average number of text messages sent or received per day is estimated using a sample mean, which serves as the best guess for the population parameter. We assume this sample is representative of the population, an assumption that underlies much of statistical inference.
Sample Mean
The sample mean is the arithmetic average of all measurements in a sample. It's used as an estimate of the population mean (the average of the entire population). In statistical terms, if the sample is drawn randomly and is sufficiently large, the sample mean tends to be a good estimator of the population mean.

In our text messaging exercise, a sample of 755 US cell phone users gives a sample mean of 41.5 messages per day. It’s important to remember that because samples vary, sample means will vary as well. This variation gives rise to the concept of the standard error which measures how much the sample mean is expected to fluctuate due to random sampling variability. The standard error in the exercise is 6.1, implying that if different samples were taken, the sample means would typically differ from the true mean by about 6.1 messages per day.

To improve comprehension, students should visualize these concepts. Picture the population as a vast ocean, and the sample mean as an average depth determined by several measurements at different locations. The standard error is like the variation in depth between these points; it’s usually not the same throughout the ocean.
Confidence Level
The confidence level is a measure of certainty - or confidence - that the population parameter falls within the confidence interval calculated from the sample. Common confidence levels include 90%, 95%, and 99%. In the text message exercise, the confidence level used is 95%. This means that if we were to take many different samples and calculate the confidence interval for each one, about 95% of these intervals would contain the true population mean.

Here's a simpler way to think about it: If you were placing bets that a friend will catch a bus that arrives every 10 minutes, a 95% confidence level is like saying, 'I'm 95% sure you'll catch a bus within 20 minutes.' Statistically speaking, there's a small chance you could be wrong, but it's a strong bet.

In the context of our exercise, we calculated the confidence interval as 41.5 ± (1.96 × 6.1). The interval captures the range within which we can say, with 95% certainty, that the true mean lies. If this concept still seems hazy, picture drawing a circle around a target; you're confident that most arrows will hit within this circle, but there's still a chance some might miss, representing the 5% uncertainty.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 consider the question (using fish) of whether uncommitted members of a group make it more democratic. It has been argued that individuals with weak preferences are particularly vulnerable to a vocal opinionated minority. However, recent studies, including computer simulations, observational studies with humans, and experiments with fish, all suggest that adding uncommitted members to a group might make for more democratic decisions by taking control away from an opinionated minority. \({ }^{36}\) In the experiment with fish, golden shiners (small freshwater fish who have a very strong tendency to stick together in schools) were trained to swim toward either yellow or blue marks to receive a treat. Those swimming toward the yellow mark were trained more to develop stronger preferences and became the fish version of individuals with strong opinions. When a minority of five opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the yellow mark) were mixed with a majority of six less opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the blue mark), the group swam toward the minority yellow mark almost all the time. When some untrained fish with no prior preferences were added, however, the majority opinion prevailed most of the time. \({ }^{37}\) Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 elaborate on this study. What Is the Effect of Including Some Indifferent Fish? In the experiment described above under Fish Democracies, the schools of fish in the study with an opinionated minority and a less passionate majority picked the majority option only about \(17 \%\) of the time. However, when groups also included 10 fish with no opinion, the schools of fish picked the majority option \(61 \%\) of the time. We want to estimate the effect of adding the fish with no opinion to the group, which means we want to estimate the difference in the two proportions. We learn from the study that the standard error for estimating this difference is about \(0.14 .\) Define the parameter we are estimating, give the best point estimate, and find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Is it plausible that adding indifferent fish really has no effect on the outcome?

Bisphenol A in Your Soup Cans Bisphenol A (BPA) is in the lining of most canned goods, and recent studies have shown a positive association between BPA exposure and behavior and health problems. How much does canned soup consumption increase urinary BPA concentration? That was the question addressed in a recent study \(^{34}\) in which consumption of canned soup over five days was associated with a more than \(1000 \%\) increase in urinary BPA. In the study, 75 participants ate either canned soup or fresh soup for lunch for five days. On the fifth day, urinary BPA levels were measured. After a two-day break, the participants switched groups and repeated the process. The difference in BPA levels between the two treatments was measured for each participant. The study reports that a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in means (canned minus fresh) is 19.6 to \(25.5 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{L}\). (a) Is this a randomized comparative experiment or a matched pairs experiment? Why might this type of experiment have been used? (b) What parameter are we estimating? (c) Interpret the confidence interval in terms of BPA concentrations. (d) If the study had included 500 participants instead of \(75,\) would you expect the confidence interval to be wider or narrower?

Moose Drool Makes Grass More Appetizing Different species can interact in interesting ways. One type of grass produces the toxin ergovaline at levels about 1.0 part per million in order to keep grazing animals away. However, a recent study \(^{27}\) has found that the saliva from a moose counteracts these toxins and makes the grass more appetizing (for the moose). Scientists estimate that, after treatment with moose drool, mean level of the toxin ergovaline (in ppm) on the grass is \(0.183 .\) The standard error for this estimate is 0.016 . (a) Give notation for the quantity being estimated, and define any parameters used. (b) Give notation for the quantity that gives the best estimate, and give its value. (c) Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the quantity being estimated. Interpret the interval in context.

What Is an Average Budget for a Hollywood Movie? Data 2.7 on page 95 introduces the dataset HollywoodMovies, which contains information on more than 900 movies that came out of Hollywood between 2007 and \(2013 .\) We will consider this the population of all movies produced in Hollywood during this time period. (a) Find the mean and standard deviation for the budgets (in millions of dollars) of all Hollywood movies between 2007 and \(2013 .\) Use the correct notation with your answer. (b) Use StatKey or other technology to generate a sampling distribution for the sample mean of budgets of Hollywood movies during this period using a sample size of \(n=20\). Give the shape and center of the sampling distribution and give the standard error.

Exercises 3.96 to 3.101 use data from a study designed to examine the effect of doing synchronized movements (such as marching in step or doing synchronized dance steps) and the effect of exertion on many different variables, such as pain tolerance and attitudes toward others. In the study, 264 high school students in Brazil were randomly assigned to one of four groups reflecting whether or not movements were synchronized (Synch= yes or no) and level of activity (Exertion= high or low). \(^{49}\) Participants rated how close they felt to others in their group both before (CloseBefore) and after (CloseAfter) the activity, using a 7-point scale (1=least close to \(7=\) most close ). Participants also had their pain tolerance measured using pressure from a blood pressure cuff, by indicating when the pressure became too uncomfortable (up to a maximum pressure of \(300 \mathrm{mmHg}\) ). Higher numbers for this Pain Tolerance measure indicate higher pain tolerance. The full dataset is available in SynchronizedMovement. For each of the following problems: (a) Give notation for the quantity we are estimating, and define any relevant parameters. (b) Use StatKey or other technology to find the value of the sample statistic. Give the correct notation with your answer. (c) Use StatKey or other technology to find the standard error for the estimate. (d) Use the standard error to give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the quantity we are estimating. (e) Interpret the confidence interval in context. How Close Do You Feel to Others? Use the closeness ratings before the activity (CloseBefore) to estimate the mean closeness rating one person would assign to others in a group.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free