Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Is a Car a Necessity? A random sample of \(n=1483\) adults in the US were asked whether they consider a car a necessity or a luxury, \({ }^{31}\) and we find that a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion saying that it is a necessity is 0.83 to \(0.89 .\) Explain the meaning of this confidence interval in the appropriate context.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval of 0.83 to 0.89 indicates that we can be 95% confident that the actual percentage of adults in the US who consider a car a necessity falls between 83% and 89% based on the sampled data.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Confidence Interval

A confidence interval is an estimated range of values which is likely to include an unknown population parameter. Here, it is used to determine the proportion of people who think a car is a necessity.
02

Applying Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval given is 0.83 to 0.89. This implies that if repeated samples were taken and the 95% confidence interval was calculated for each sample, the actual population parameter would be within the interval estimates 95% of the time.
03

Interpreting the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval 0.83 to 0.89 indicates that we can be 95% confident that the true proportion of all US adults who consider a car a necessity lies between 83% and 89%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Inference
Statistical inference is a cornerstone of data analysis, allowing us to draw conclusions about a population based on a sample of data. It's a way of 'making sense' of data by using various methods to test hypotheses and estimate population characteristics. In the context of the given exercise, statistical inference is used to derive a conclusion about the entire US adult population’s opinion on cars being a necessity, based on the sample of 1,483 individuals.

Understanding Through Confidence Intervals

One of the primary tools of statistical inference is the confidence interval, which gives us a range in which we expect the true population parameter to fall a certain percentage of the time. For instance, in our car necessity question, we interpret the 95% confidence interval of 0.83 to 0.89 as a statistically informed estimate, indicating that we are 95% certain the actual proportion in the full population falls within this range. The confidence level (95% in this case) reflects how sure we are that the intervals calculated from different random samples will contain the true parameter.
Population Parameter Estimation
Population parameter estimation is the process of using sample data to estimate the characteristics of a larger population. In a statistical sense, parameters are numerical characteristics that summarize data for an entire population, like the mean or proportion. As individuals, we cannot survey an entire population due to constraints like time and cost, but we can estimate parameters like the mean or proportion using a representative sample.

The Role of Sample Data

The 1,483 US adults represent the sample data from which we can estimate the population parameter — in this case, the proportion who view a car as a necessity rather than a luxury. Estimation comes in two types: point estimation and interval estimation. Point estimation provides a single value as an estimate of the population parameter, while interval estimation gives a range (like the confidence interval) where the parameter is likely to fall. The latter is more informative as it also communicates the estimate's precision.
Sample Proportion
The sample proportion is a statistic that estimates the proportion of the population that has a particular characteristic, based on a sample drawn from that population. It's calculated by dividing the number of individuals in the sample with the characteristic by the total sample size. In our exercise, the characteristic of interest is considering a car a necessity.

Relevance in the Real World

For the surveyed sample of US adults, the calculation would involve the number who answered that they see a car as a necessity divided by 1,483, the total sample size. This gives us a sample proportion, which we then use to infer about the population's perspective. Because it's based on a sample, the sample proportion is subject to sampling variability—thus the need for a confidence interval, which acknowledges this variability and provides a range that the true population proportion is likely to fall within.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What Proportion of Adults and Teens Text Message? A study of \(n=2252\) adults age 18 or older found that \(72 \%\) of the cell phone users send and receive text messages. \({ }^{15}\) A study of \(n=800\) teens age 12 to 17 found that \(87 \%\) of the teen cell phone users send and receive text messages. What is the best estimate for the difference in the proportion of cell phone users who use text messages, between adults (defined as 18 and over) and teens? Give notation (as a difference with a minus sign) for the quantity we are trying to estimate, notation for the quantity that gives the best estimate, and the value of the best estimate. Be sure to clearly define any parameters in the context of this situation.

\(\mathbf{3 . 1 2 3}\) What Proportion Have Pesticides Detected? In addition to the quantitative variable pesticide concentration, the researchers also report whether or not the pesticide was detected in the urine (at standard detection levels). Before the participants started eating organic, 111 of the 240 measurements (combining all pesticides and people) yielded a positive pesticide detection. While eating organic, only 24 of the 240 measurements resulted in a positive pesticide detection. (a) Calculate the sample difference in proportions: proportion of measurements resulting in pesticide detection while eating non- organic minus proportion of measurements resulting in pesticide detection while eating organic. (b) Figure 3.33 gives a bootstrap distribution for the difference in proportions, based on \(1000 \mathrm{sim}-\) ulated bootstrap samples. Approximate a \(98 \%\) confidence interval. (c) Interpret this interval in context.

3.62 Employer-Based Health Insurance A report from a Gallup poll \(^{29}\) in 2011 started by saying, "Forty-five percent of American adults reported getting their health insurance from an employer...." Later in the article we find information on the sampling method, "a random sample of 147,291 adults, aged 18 and over, living in the US," and a sentence about the accuracy of the results, "the maximum margin of sampling error is ±1 percentage point." (a) What is the population? What is the sample? What is the population parameter of interest? What is the relevant statistic? (b) Use the margin of error \(^{30}\) to give an interval showing plausible values for the parameter of interest. Interpret it in terms of getting health insurance from an employer.

Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 consider the question (using fish) of whether uncommitted members of a group make it more democratic. It has been argued that individuals with weak preferences are particularly vulnerable to a vocal opinionated minority. However, recent studies, including computer simulations, observational studies with humans, and experiments with fish, all suggest that adding uncommitted members to a group might make for more democratic decisions by taking control away from an opinionated minority. \({ }^{36}\) In the experiment with fish, golden shiners (small freshwater fish who have a very strong tendency to stick together in schools) were trained to swim toward either yellow or blue marks to receive a treat. Those swimming toward the yellow mark were trained more to develop stronger preferences and became the fish version of individuals with strong opinions. When a minority of five opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the yellow mark) were mixed with a majority of six less opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the blue mark), the group swam toward the minority yellow mark almost all the time. When some untrained fish with no prior preferences were added, however, the majority opinion prevailed most of the time. \({ }^{37}\) Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 elaborate on this study. What Is the Effect of Including Some Indifferent Fish? In the experiment described above under Fish Democracies, the schools of fish in the study with an opinionated minority and a less passionate majority picked the majority option only about \(17 \%\) of the time. However, when groups also included 10 fish with no opinion, the schools of fish picked the majority option \(61 \%\) of the time. We want to estimate the effect of adding the fish with no opinion to the group, which means we want to estimate the difference in the two proportions. We learn from the study that the standard error for estimating this difference is about \(0.14 .\) Define the parameter we are estimating, give the best point estimate, and find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Is it plausible that adding indifferent fish really has no effect on the outcome?

To create a confidence interval from a bootstrap distribution using percentiles, we keep the middle values and chop off a certain percent from each tail. Indicate what percent of values must be chopped off from each tail for each confidence level given. (a) \(95 \%\) (b) \(90 \%\) (c) \(98 \%\) (d) \(99 \%\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free