Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In estimating the mean score on a fitness exam, we use an original sample of size \(n=30\) and a bootstrap distribution containing 5000 bootstrap samples to obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval of 67 to \(73 .\) In Exercises 3.106 to 3.111 , a change in this process is described. If all else stays the same, which of the following confidence intervals \((A, B,\) or \(C)\) is the most likely result after the change: \(\begin{array}{ll}A .66 \text { to } 74 & B .67 \text { to } 73\end{array}\) C. 67.5 to 72.5 Using 1000 bootstrap samples for the distribution.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the solution steps, the confidence interval which is likely to result from dwindling the number of bootstrap samples is a wider one. Therefore, Interval \(A .66 \text { to } 74\) appears to be the most probable result after the change.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Bootstrap Sampling

Bootstrapping is a resampling technique used for inferring about a population from sample data. It helps ascertain the accuracy of predictive models by assigning measures of accuracy (bias, variance, confidence intervals, prediction error, etc.) to sample estimates.
02

Effect of the Number of Bootstrap Samples

The variation in the number of bootstrap samples can affect the stability and accuracy of the estimates. The more bootstrap samples, the more stable and precise the estimates, hence a better confidence interval would be generated. Conversely, lesser bootstrap samples may lead to a less precise and stable confidence interval estimate.
03

Applying the Concept to the Given Scenario

In this situation, the number of bootstrap samples have been reduced from 5000 to 1000. This reduction in the number of bootstrap samples may decrease the precision and stability of the confidence interval. This means the confidence interval length may increase (become wider).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval Estimation
Confidence interval estimation is a critical tool used in statistics to indicate the reliability of an estimated range for a certain parameter, such as a mean or proportion.

When we talk about a 95% confidence interval, we mean that if we were to take 100 different samples and compute a confidence interval for each sample, we would expect about 95 of those intervals to contain the true population parameter. This does not mean that there's a 95% chance that a specific interval contains the population parameter, but rather that 95% of similarly constructed intervals from repeated sampling would capture the true value.

In the fitness exam score example, the confidence interval is estimated using bootstrap samples, which provides a range where the true mean is likely to fall. The range of 67 to 73 represents such an interval where the mean score is expected to lie with 95% confidence, based on the bootstrap samples taken from the original data.
Resampling Techniques
Resampling techniques are statistical methods that involve repeatedly drawing samples from a dataset and calculating a statistic for each sample. This process allows analysts to create a sampling distribution and make inferences about the overall population.

Bootstrap sampling, a common resampling technique, involves creating thousands of 'pseudo samples' by sampling with replacement from the original data. These pseudo samples are then used to calculate various statistics, such as the mean or standard deviation, to construct a distribution.

Why Resampling Matters

Resampling is powerful because it does not make strict assumptions about the data distribution, and it can provide more accurate measures in small or unconventional datasets. Reducing the number of bootstrap samples, from 5000 to 1000 for instance, can impact the results, as the confidence interval may become less precise. The more samples used, the closer the bootstrap distribution tends to mirror what would be achieved from an actual population.
Inferential Statistics
Inferential statistics allow us to draw conclusions and make predictions about a population based on samples of data. It takes information from a small part of the population (a sample) to make inferences about the larger group from which the sample was drawn.

Key to inferential statistics is the use of probability theory to estimate the likelihood of accuracy in the conclusions being made, hence the term 'statistical inference'. Using methods like hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, and regression analysis, researchers can apply sample data to generalizations about a population.

In the fitness exam scenario, even with a reduced number of bootstrap samples, inferential statistics still enable the estimation of the confidence interval. However, it is important to note that with fewer samples, the confidence level remains the same (95%) but the interval might become wider, signaling less precision in the estimation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 consider the question (using fish) of whether uncommitted members of a group make it more democratic. It has been argued that individuals with weak preferences are particularly vulnerable to a vocal opinionated minority. However, recent studies, including computer simulations, observational studies with humans, and experiments with fish, all suggest that adding uncommitted members to a group might make for more democratic decisions by taking control away from an opinionated minority. \({ }^{36}\) In the experiment with fish, golden shiners (small freshwater fish who have a very strong tendency to stick together in schools) were trained to swim toward either yellow or blue marks to receive a treat. Those swimming toward the yellow mark were trained more to develop stronger preferences and became the fish version of individuals with strong opinions. When a minority of five opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the yellow mark) were mixed with a majority of six less opinionated fish (wanting to aim for the blue mark), the group swam toward the minority yellow mark almost all the time. When some untrained fish with no prior preferences were added, however, the majority opinion prevailed most of the time. \({ }^{37}\) Exercises 3.71 to 3.73 elaborate on this study. How Often Does the Fish Majority Win? In a school of fish with a minority of strongly opinionated fish wanting to aim for the yellow mark and a majority of less passionate fish wanting to aim for the blue mark, as described under Fish Democracies above, a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of times the majority wins (they go to the blue mark) is 0.09 to \(0.26 .\) Interpret this confidence interval. Is it plausible that fish in this situation are equally likely to go for either of the two options?

Daily Tip Revenue for a Waitress Data 2.12 on page 123 describes information from a sample of 157 restaurant bills collected at the First Crush bistro. The data is available in RestaurantTips. Two intervals are given below for the average tip left at a restaurant; one is a \(90 \%\) confidence interval and one is a \(99 \%\) confidence interval. Interval A: 3.55 to 4.15 Interval B: 3.35 to 4.35 (a) Which one is the \(90 \%\) confidence interval? Which one is the \(99 \%\) confidence interval? (b) One waitress generally waits on 20 tables in an average shift. Give a range for her expected daily tip revenue, using both \(90 \%\) and \(99 \%\) confidence. Interpret your results.

Effect of Overeating for One Month: Correlation between Short-Term and Long- Term Weight Gain In Exercise 3.70 on page \(227,\) we describe a study in which participants ate significantly more and exercised significantly less for a month. Two and a half years later, participants weighed an average of 6.8 pounds more than at the start of the experiment (while the weights of a control group had not changed). Is the amount of weight gained over the following 2.5 years directly related to how much weight was gained during the one-month period? For the 18 participants, the correlation between increase of body weight during the one-month intervention and increase of body weight after 30 months is \(r=0.21 .\) We want to estimate, for the population of all adults, the correlation between weight gain over one month of bingeing and the effect of that month on a person's weight 2.5 years later. (a) What is the population parameter of interest? What is the best estimate for that parameter? (b) To find the sample correlation \(r=0.21,\) we used a dataset containing 18 ordered pairs (weight gain over the one month and weight gain 2.5 years later for each individual in the study). Describe how to use this data to obtain one bootstrap sample. (c) What statistic is recorded for the bootstrap sample? (d) Suppose that we use technology to calculate the relevant statistic for 1000 bootstrap samples. Describe how to find the standard error using those bootstrap statistics. (e) The standard error for one set of bootstrap statistics is 0.14. Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the correlation. (f) Use the confidence interval from part (e) to indicate whether you are confident that there is a positive correlation between amount of weight gain during the one-month intervention and amount of weight gained over the next 2.5 years, or whether it is plausible that there is no correlation at all. Explain your reasoning. (g) Will a \(90 \%\) confidence interval most likely be wider or narrower than the \(95 \%\) confidence interval found in part (e)?

A sample is given. Indicate whether each option is a possible bootstrap sample from this original sample. Original sample: 85,72,79,97,88 . Do the values given constitute a possible bootstrap sample from the original sample? (a) 79,79,97,85,88 (b) 72,79,85,88,97 (c) 85,88,97,72 (d) 88,97,81,78,85 (e) 97,85,79,85,97 (f) 72,72,79,72,79

Adolescent Brains Are Different Researchers continue to find evidence that brains of adolescents behave quite differently than either brains of adults or brains of children. In particular, adolescents seem to hold on more strongly to fear associations than either children or adults, suggesting that frightening connections made during the teen years are particularly hard to unlearn. In one study, \({ }^{25}\) participants first learned to associate fear with a particular sound. In the second part of the study, participants heard the sound without the fear-causing mechanism, and their ability to "unlearn" the connection was measured. A physiological measure of fear was used, and larger numbers indicate less fear. We are estimating the difference in mean response between adults and teenagers. The mean response for adults in the study was 0.225 and the mean response for teenagers in the study was \(0.059 .\) We are told that the standard error of the estimate is 0.091 . (a) Give notation for the quantity being estimated. (b) Give notation for the quantity that gives the best estimate, and give its value. (c) Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the quantity being estimated. (d) Is this an experiment or an observational study?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free