Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In order for a vaccine to be effective, it should reduce a person's chance of acquiring a disease. Consider a hypothetical vaccine for malaria-a tropical disease that kills between 1.5 and 2.7 million people every year. \(^{20}\) Suppose the vaccine is tested with 500 volunteers in a village who are malaria free at the beginning of the trial. Two hundred of the volunteers will get the experimental vaccine and the rest will not be vaccinated. Suppose that the chance of contracting malaria is \(10 \%\) for those who are not vaccinated. Construct a two-way table to show the results of the experiment if: (a) The vaccine has no effect. (b) The vaccine cuts the risk of contracting malaria in half.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The table for the scenario where the vaccine has no effect contains the figures: Vaccinated & contracted malaria: 20, Not vaccinated & contracted malaria: 30. The table for the scenario where the vaccine cuts risk in half contains the figures: Vaccinated & contracted malaria:10, Not vaccinated & contracted malaria:30.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of number of individuals not vaccinated

From the total of 500 volunteers subtract the 200 who received the vaccine. So, the number of individuals who are not vaccinated is \(500 - 200 = 300\).
02

Table for vaccine having no effect

In this scenario, the vaccine does not reduce the risk of contracting malaria. For this case, the number of individuals within each group who contract the disease can be calculated as 10% of the population of that group. \n - Vaccinated and contracted malaria: \(10\% \times 200 = 20\) - Not Vaccinated and contracted malaria: \(10\% \times 300 = 30\) All the rest in each group didn't contract the disease. So in the table there should be these values: \n | - | Vaccinated | Unvaccinated | | --- | --- | --- | | Contracted Malaria | 20 | 30 | | Didn't Contract Malaria | 180 | 270 |
03

Table for vaccine cutting risk in half

In this scenario, the vaccine reduces contraction risk by half. This means we divide the percentage of contracting the disease for vaccinated individuals by 2. For vaccinated individuals, risk becomes: \(10/2 = 5\% \). For not vaccinated remains 10%. The people contracting the disease in each group are: - Vaccinated and contracted malaria: \(5\% \times 200 = 10 \) - Not vaccinated and contracted malaria: \(10 \% \times 300=30 \) All the rest in each group didn't contract the disease. So in the table there should be these values: \n | - | Vaccinated | Unvaccinated | | --- | --- | --- | | Contracted Malaria | 10 | 30 | | Didn't Contract Malaria | 190 | 270 |

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sketch a curve showing a distribution that is symmetric and bell-shaped and has approximately the given mean and standard deviation. In each case, draw the curve on a horizontal axis with scale 0 to 10. Mean 5 and standard deviation 0.5

Exercise 2.149 examines the relationship between region of the country and level of physical activity of the population of US states. From the USStates dataset, examine a different relationship between a categorical variable and a quantitative variable. Select one of each type of variable and use technology to create side-by-side boxplots to examine the relationship between the variables. State which two variables you are using and describe what you see in the boxplots. In addition, use technology to compute comparative summary statistics and compare means and standard deviations for the different groups.

Draw any scatterplot satisfying the following conditions: (a) \(n=10\) and \(r=1\) (b) \(n=8\) and \(r=-1\) (c) \(n=5\) and \(r=0\)

We use data from HollywoodMovies introduced in Data 2.7 on page \(95 .\) The dataset includes information on all movies to come out of Hollywood between 2007 and 2013 . The variable AudienceScore in the dataset HollywoodMovies gives audience scores (on a scale from 1 to 100 ) from the Rotten Tomatoes website. The five number summary of these scores is (19,49,61,74,96) . Are there any outliers in these scores, according to the \(I Q R\) method? How bad would an average audience score rating have to be on Rotten Tomatoes to qualify as a low outlier?

Each describe a sample. The information given includes the five number summary, the sample size, and the largest and smallest data values in the tails of the distribution. In each case: (a) Clearly identify any outliers, using the IQR method. (b) Draw a boxplot. Five number summary: (42,72,78,80,99)\(;\) \(n=120 .\) Tails: 42, 63, \(65,67,68, \ldots, 88,89,95,96,99\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free