Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 2.143 on page 102 introduces a study that examines several variables on collegiate football players, including the variable Years, which is number of years playing football, and the variable Cognition, which gives percentile on a cognitive reaction test. Exercise 2.182 shows a scatterplot for these two variables and gives the correlation as -0.366 . The regression line for predicting Cognition from Years is: $$\text { Cognition }=102-3.34 \cdot \text { Years }$$ (a) Predict the cognitive percentile for someone who has played football for 8 years and for someone who has played football for 14 years. (b) Interpret the slope in terms of football and \(\operatorname{cog}-\) nitive percentile. (c) All the participants had played between 7 and 18 years of football. Is it reasonable to interpret the intercept in context? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) When playing football for 8 years, the cognitive percentile is approximately 75.28, and for 14 years, it is approximately 58.24. b) The slope of -3.34 indicates that for each additional year playing football, there is an expected decrease of 3.34 percentile in cognitive reaction test score. c) It is not reasonable to interpret the intercept in this context because it represents the cognitive percentile when Years is zero, which falls outside the given years range of 7 to 18.

Step by step solution

01

Predict cognitive percentile based on years playing football

Substitute the given years values into the regression equation, that is, for 8 years, calculate \(Cognition = 102 - 3.34 * 8\), and for 14 years, calculate \(Cognition = 102 - 3.34 * 14.\)
02

Interpret the slope in context

The slope of the regression line is -3.34. It represents the change in the dependent variable (Cognition) for each unit increase in the independent variable (Years). In the context of the problem, the slope can be interpreted as the expected decrease in cognitive percentile for each additional year playing football.
03

Interpret the intercept in context

The intercept is the value of the dependent variable (Cognition) when the independent variable (Years) is zero. However, since the range of Years all participants had played football is between 7 and 18, it is not reasonable to interpret the intercept in this context, as it falls outside the scope of the data set.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cognitive Percentile Prediction
Understanding cognitive percentile prediction through regression analysis is pivotal in many statistical applications. In the context of the textbook example, the ability to predict an individual's cognitive test percentile based on the number of years they've played football is assessed through a regression equation. To do this, one substitutes the number of years played into the given regression equation. For example, to predict the cognitive percentile for a player with 8 years of football, one would compute:
\[ Cognition = 102 - 3.34 \times 8. \]
For 14 years, the equation would be
\[ Cognition = 102 - 3.34 \times 14. \]
These calculations yield the expected cognitive percentile for the respective years played. It's important to note that this prediction assumes a linear relationship between years of playing football and cognition, as implied by the data and the correlation provided in the study.
Regression Equation Interpretation
The interpretation of a regression equation is fundamental in making sense of the relationship between variables. In our example, the equation
\[ Cognition = 102 - 3.34 \times Years \]
indicates that the starting point for cognitive percentile (when no years are played) is 102. However, as the number of years increases, the cognitive percentile decreases. The negative sign in front of the 3.34 coefficient tells us that there is an inverse relationship between playing football and cognitive percentile, according to the data. This means that as the Years variable increases, the Cognition score tends to decrease. Understanding this relationship allows researchers and students alike to draw inferences and make predictive statements about the data set in question.
Slope and Intercept Analysis
In regression analysis, slope and intercept are the cornerstone to understanding the dynamics of the relationship between variables. The slope, -3.34, in our equation represents the average change in cognitive percentile for each additional year of playing football.
It indicates that, on average, a player's cognitive percentile is expected to decrease by 3.34 points for each year they continue to play football. This factor is crucial for understanding the potential impact of playing time on cognition as seen in the study.
The intercept, 102, theoretically represents the cognitive percentile when a player has zero years of football experience. Since the range of Years in the study is from 7 to 18, the intercept can't be applied directly to the context because it represents an extrapolation beyond the observed data range. Interpreting the intercept requires caution since it may not hold true for values outside the studied interval, such as someone who has never played football.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Donating Blood to Grandma? Can young blood help old brains? Several studies \(^{32}\) in mice indicate that it might. In the studies, old mice (equivalent to about a 70 -year-old person) were randomly assigned to receive blood plasma either from a young mouse (equivalent to about a 25 -year-old person) or another old mouse. The mice receiving the young blood showed multiple signs of a reversal of brain aging. One of the studies \(^{33}\) measured exercise endurance using maximum treadmill runtime in a 90 -minute window. The number of minutes of runtime are given in Table 2.17 for the 17 mice receiving plasma from young mice and the 13 mice receiving plasma from old mice. The data are also available in YoungBlood. $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Table 2.17 Number of minutes on a treadmill }\\\ &\begin{array}{|l|lllllll|} \hline \text { Young } & 27 & 28 & 31 & 35 & 39 & 40 & 45 \\ & 46 & 55 & 56 & 59 & 68 & 76 & 90 \\ & 90 & 90 & 90 & & & & \\ \hline \text { Old } & 19 & 21 & 22 & 25 & 28 & 29 & 29 \\ & 31 & 36 & 42 & 50 & 51 & 68 & \\ \hline \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ (a) Calculate \(\bar{x}_{Y},\) the mean number of minutes on the treadmill for those mice receiving young blood. (b) Calculate \(\bar{x}_{O},\) the mean number of minutes on the treadmill for those mice receiving old blood. (c) To measure the effect size of the young blood, we are interested in the difference in means \(\bar{x}_{Y}-\bar{x}_{O} .\) What is this difference? Interpret the result in terms of minutes on a treadmill. (d) Does this data come from an experiment or an observational study? (e) If the difference is found to be significant, can we conclude that young blood increases exercise endurance in old mice? (Researchers are just beginning to start similar studies on humans.)

Describe a Variable Describe one quantitative variable that you believe will give data that are skewed to the right, and explain your reasoning. Do not use a variable that has already been discussed.

Use technology to find the regression line to predict \(Y\) from \(X\). $$\begin{array}{lrlllll}\hline X & 10 & 20 & 30 & 40 & 50 & 60 \\\Y & 112 & 85 & 92 & 71 & 64 & 70 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

If we have learned to solve problems by one method, we often have difficulty bringing new insight to similar problems. However, electrical stimulation of the brain appears to help subjects come up with fresh insight. In a recent experiment \({ }^{17}\) conducted at the University of Sydney in Australia, 40 participants were trained to solve problems in a certain way and then asked to solve an unfamiliar problem that required fresh insight. Half of the participants were randomly assigned to receive non-invasive electrical stimulation of the brain while the other half (control group) received sham stimulation as a placebo. The participants did not know which group they were in. In the control group, \(20 \%\) of the participants successfully solved the problem while \(60 \%\) of the participants who received brain stimulation solved the problem. (a) Is this an experiment or an observational study? Explain. (b) From the description, does it appear that the study is double-blind, single-blind, or not blind? (c) What are the variables? Indicate whether each is categorical or quantitative. (d) Make a two-way table of the data. (e) What percent of the people who correctly solved the problem had the electrical stimulation? (f) Give values for \(\hat{p}_{E},\) the proportion of people in the electrical stimulation group to solve the problem, and \(\hat{p}_{S},\) the proportion of people in the sham stimulation group to solve the problem. What is the difference in proportions \(\hat{p}_{E}-\hat{p}_{S} ?\) (g) Does electrical stimulation of the brain appear to help insight?

Exercise 2.149 examines the relationship between region of the country and level of physical activity of the population of US states. From the USStates dataset, examine a different relationship between a categorical variable and a quantitative variable. Select one of each type of variable and use technology to create side-by-side boxplots to examine the relationship between the variables. State which two variables you are using and describe what you see in the boxplots. In addition, use technology to compute comparative summary statistics and compare means and standard deviations for the different groups.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free