Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Indicate whether we should trust the results of the study. Is the method of data collection biased? If it is, explain why. Take 10 apples off the top of a truckload of apples and measure the amount of bruising on those apples to estimate how much bruising there is, on average, in the whole truckload.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The results of the study may not be trusted because the method of data collection is biased. The 10 apples taken from the top of the truckload do not represent the condition of all apples in the truckload, especially those at the middle and bottom which are subjected to more pressure and hence, more bruising.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the Method Used

The method used in the study is to pick up 10 apples from the top of a truckload and measure their bruising to estimate the average bruise in the whole truckload. In order to assess the bias, it is necessary to determine whether this sample of 10 apples is truly representative of the entire truckload.
02

Determining if the Sample is Representative

Apples at the top of the truckload are not subjected to the same conditions as those at the middle or bottom of the pile. They are less likely to be bruised as they aren't under the pressure of other apples stacked on top of them. Therefore, they may not accurately represent the bruising on all apples in the truckload.
03

Drawing Conclusion about the Bias

Since the 10 apples taken from the top are not likely to be representative of all apples in the truckload, the method of data collection in this study can be considered as biased.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sampling Methods
Understanding sampling methods is crucial in ensuring data accuracy. Sampling involves selecting a subset of individuals, items, or events from a larger population to gain insights about the entire group. The core objective of sampling is to make a statistical inference about the population in a cost-effective and efficient manner.

There are different sampling methods, broadly categorized into two types: probability sampling and non-probability sampling. Probability sampling guarantees that every member has a known chance of being selected, which helps to achieve a sample that's representative of the larger population. Major types of probability sampling include random sampling, stratified sampling, cluster sampling, and systematic sampling. In contrast, non-probability sampling does not ensure that every member has a known or equal chance of being selected. Types include convenience sampling, judgmental or purposive sampling, and quota sampling.

The method cited in the exercise, taking 10 apples off the top of a truckload, resembles convenience sampling – a non-probability method. While often quicker and less expensive, it can introduce significant bias, as it relies on samples that are easy to obtain rather than those that accurately reflect the population. It is important to recognize when convenience sampling can be appropriately used and when it is likely to undermine the reliability and validity of study results.
Representative Sample
A representative sample accurately reflects the characteristics of the population from which it is drawn. Achieving representativeness is vital because it allows findings from the sample to be generalized back to the population. Various factors determine whether a sample is representative, including the sampling method, the size of the sample, and whether the sample is subject to any biases.

For instance, in the context of the given exercise, the sample size of 10 apples from the top of a truckload is likely not representative. This is because these apples do not experience the conditions of the entire population of apples, which includes varying levels of pressure and potential bruising. A more representative sample might involve a random selection of apples from various depths within the truckload or employing a stratified sampling approach to ensure that apples from different sections are proportionally included.

To improve representativeness, one should consider using random sampling or applying stratification policies so that all relevant subsections of the population are included. Avoiding selection bias is essential, as non-representative samples can lead to incorrect conclusions about the population.
Statistical Bias
Statistical bias refers to systemic errors that skew results in a certain direction, away from the true value of the parameter being estimated. In data collection, biases can arise through various means, such as the sampling method, data processing, or measurement processes. Bias can severely compromise the validity of a study because it suggests that the conclusions may not be accurate representations of the reality.

In the bruised apples example, the bias occurs due to the sampling method. Only apples from the top layer of the truckload were selected, which does not consider the variation in conditions throughout the entire truckload. The selected apples are less likely to be bruised, which could result in an underestimate of the average amount of bruising.

Statistical bias can be mitigated by adopting unbiased sampling techniques, ensuring that measurement processes are consistent, and remaining vigilant about identifying and addressing potential sources of bias throughout the research process. Awareness and correction of bias are the first steps towards ensuring the reliability and credibility of study findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Next time you see an elderly man, check out his nose and ears! While most parts of the human body stop growing as we reach adulthood, studies show that noses and ears continue to grow larger throughout our lifetime. In one study \(^{14}\) examining noses, researchers report "Age significantly influenced all analyzed measurements:" including volume, surface area, height, and width of noses. The gender of the 859 participants in the study was also recorded, and the study reports that "male increments in nasal dimensions were larger than female ones." (a) How many variables are mentioned in this description? (b) How many of the variables are categorical? How many are quantitative? (c) If we create a dataset of the information with cases as rows and variables as columns, how many rows and how many columns would the dataset have?

In elementary school (grades 1 to 6 ), there is a strong association between a child's height and the child's reading ability. Taller children tend to be able to read at a higher level. However, there is a very significant confounding variable that is influencing both height and reading ability. What is it?

In Exercise \(1.18,\) we ask whether experiences of parents can affect future children, and describe a study that suggests the answer is yes. A second study, described in the same reference, shows similar effects. Young female mice were assigned to either live for two weeks in an enriched environment or not. Matching what has been seen in other similar experiments, the adult mice who had been exposed to an enriched environment were smarter (in the sense that they learned how to navigate mazes faster) than the mice that did not have that experience. The other interesting result, however, was that the offspring of the mice exposed to the enriched environment were also smarter than the offspring of the other mice, even though none of the offspring were exposed to an enriched environment themselves. What are the two main variables in this study? Is each categorical or quantitative? Identify explanatory and response variables.

Exercise 1.59 on page 28 introduced a study on cat videos, in which people who clicked on the link were asked questions regarding their mood before and after the most recent time they watched a cat video. Overall, participants reported that after watching a cat video they had significantly more energy, fewer negative emotions, and more positive emotions. Can we conclude from this study that watching cat videos increases energy and improves emotional state?

A recent headline reads "Early Language Skills Reduce Preschool Tantrums, Study Finds," \(\sqrt{7}\) and the article offers a potential explanation for this: "Verbalizing their frustrations may help little ones cope." The article refers to a study that recorded the language skill level and the number of tantrums of a sample of preschoolers. (a) Is this an observational study or a randomized experiment? (b) Can we conclude that "Early Language Skills Reduce Preschool Tantrums"? Why or why not? (c) Give a potential confounding variable.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free