Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article “Readability of Liquid Crystal Displays: A Response Surface" (Human Factors [1983]: 185190 ) used an estimated regression equation to describe the relationship between y= error percentage for subjects reading a four-digit liquid crystal display and the independent variables x1= level of backlight, x2= character subtense, x3= viewing angle, and x4= level of ambient light. From a table given in the article, SSRegr =19.2, SSResid =20.0, and n=30. a. Does the estimated regression equation specify a useful relationship between y and the independent variables? Use the model utility test with a .05 significance level. b. Calculate R2 and se for this model. Interpret these values. c. Do you think that the estimated regression equation would provide reasonably accurate predictions of error percentage? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The calculated F-statistic is 2.4. Depending on the critical value from the F-distribution table, it can be determined if the model shows a useful relationship. b. The R2 value is 0.49, indicating a moderate fit and the standard error se is 0.482 which suggests a fairly accurate model. c. Given these values, it can be said that the model is likely to provide reasonably accurate predictions for the error percentage.

Step by step solution

01

Use Model utility test

A model utility test is performed to check if the regression equation is useful in determining the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. This can be done using an F-test, with a .05 significance level. The formula to calculate the F-statistic is F=SSRegr/kSSResid/(nk1), where k is the number of independent variables, n is the total number of observations. In this problem, SSRegr=19.2, SSResid=20.0, k=4, and n=30. So, calculating it yields F=2.4. In order to reject the null hypothesis—that there's no relationship between the variables—the calculated F statistic needs to be greater than the critical F-value from the F-distribution table with degrees of freedom df1=k and df2=nk1. Comparing the calculated F-value with the critical F-value from the F-table will allow us to determine if the regression equation provides a useful relationship between y and the independent variables.
02

Calculate and interpret R2

The coefficient of determination R2 can be calculated using the formula R2=SSRegr/(SSRegr+SSResid). This value can range from 0 to 1, where a higher value indicates a better fit of the model to the data. The closer the value of R2 is to 1, the better the model is at explaining the total variance in the data. Substituting the given values, we find R2=0.49. This means that 49% of the variability in the dependent variable can be explained by the regression model, which is moderately good, as the explanation rate is close to 50%.
03

Calculate the standard error of the estimate and interpret it

The standard error of the estimate (se) gives an indication of the typical error in predicting y. It can be calculated using the formula se=SSResid/(nk1). This value gives the spread of the residuals—smaller values indicate a more accurate model. On calculation, se comes out to be 0.482. This value implies that there will be on average a 0.482 percentage point error when predicting error percentage using this model.
04

Reasoning the accuracy of the model

While the R2 value is just under 50%, which indicates that the model does a fair job of explaining the data, the standard error of the estimate is also fairly small. Therefore, while the model so far might not be perfect, it could probably provide reasonable predictions for the error percentage. More factors could be taken into account to refine the model further based on domain knowledge and statistical significance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Error Percentage Prediction
Predicting error percentages involves analyzing the deviations between actual observed values and the values predicted by the regression model. In this context, a regression model is constructed to relate the error percentage in reading a liquid crystal display to several independent variables like backlight level and ambient light. The predictive accuracy of this model is crucial for ensuring that it can reliably anticipate situations affecting readability.

To evaluate the model's accuracy, we look at parameters such as the coefficient of determination and the standard error, which provide insights into the model's effectiveness. The closer the predictions match actual observations, the more reliable the model is deemed to be for practical use. In any prediction model, assessing whether it can provide accurate outcomes is fundamental, especially when the implications affect usability and performance environments.
Model Utility Test
The model utility test is a statistical method used to determine if a regression model offers a meaningful association between independent variables and a dependent variable. This involves performing an F-test. This test assesses whether the regression model reduces uncertainty in predicting the dependent variable better than a model without any predictors, essentially questioning if the added complexity of predictors is justified.

The test employs the F-statistic formula: F=SSRegr/kSSResid/(nk1) This compares explained variance to unexplained variance. We calculate this statistic and compare it to a critical F-value from an F-distribution table. If the computed F-value exceeds the critical value, the model is considered useful. This procedure helps researchers decide whether to retain or modify their predictive models.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, denoted as R2, is a metric that quantifies how well a regression model explains the variability of the dependent variable. It is defined by the formula: R2=SSRegrSSRegr+SSResidThe result ranges from 0 to 1, where a value closer to 1 indicates that the model explains a large portion of the variance. In simpler terms, it shows the strength of the relationship between the model and the dependent variable.

For instance, an R2 value of 0.49 suggests that approximately 49% of the variance in error percentage is captured by the model, indicating a moderate level of accuracy. Researchers use this value to judge a model's performance and to decide if further enhancements or additional variables are needed.
Standard Error of Estimate
The standard error of estimate, represented as se, provides a measure of how much observed values deviate from the predicted values set by the regression model. It is akin to the standard deviation but in the context of a regression line.

This statistic is calculated using the formula: se=SSResidnk1 Where a smaller se indicates tighter clusters of data points around the estimated regression line, implying more accurate predictions. In the scenario provided, se calculated at 0.482 means that the model's predictions will deviate, on average, by around 0.482 percentage points from actual observations. Evaluating se helps in understanding model precision and assessing where potential improvements can be made to enhance forecast accuracy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Data from a sample of n=150 quail eggs were used to fit a multiple regression model relating y= eggshell surface area (mm2) x1= egg weight (g) x2=egg width (mm) x3= egg length (mm) (“Predicting Yolk Height, Yolk Width, Albumen Length, Eggshell Weight, Egg Shape Index, Eggshell Thickness, Egg Surface Area of Japanese Quails Using Various Egg Traits as Regressors," International Journal of Poultry Science [2008]: 85-88). The resulting estimated regression function was 10.561+1.535x10.178x20.045x3 and R2=.996 a. Carry out a model utility test to determine if this multiple regression model is useful. b. A simple linear regression model was also used to describe the relationship between y and x1, resulting in the estimated regression function 6.254+1.387x1. The P -value for the associated model utility test was reported to be less than .01 , and r2=.994. Is the linear model useful? Explain. c. Based on your answers to Parts (a) and (b), which of the two models would you recommend for predicting eggshell surface area? Explain the rationale for your choice.

The article "Pulp Brightness Reversion: Influence of Residual Lignin on the Brightness Reversion of Bleached Sulfite and Kraft Pulps” (TAPPI [1964]: 653662 ) proposed a quadratic regression model to describe the relationship between x= degree of delignification during the processing of wood pulp for paper and y= total chlorine content. Suppose that the population regression model is y=220+75x4x2+e a. Graph the regression function 220+75x4x2 over x values between 2 and 12 . (Substitute x=2, 4,6,8,10, and 12 to find points on the graph, and connect them with a smooth curve.) b. Would mean chlorine content be higher for a degree of delignification value of 8 or 10 ? c. What is the change in mean chlorine content when the degree of delignification increases from 8 to 9 ? From 9 to 10?

The article "Effect of Manual Defoliation on Pole Bean Yield" (Journal of Economic Entomology [1984]: 10191023 ) used a quadratic regression model to describe the relationship between y= yield (kg/ plot ) and x= defoliation level (a proportion between 0 and 1) The estimated regression equation based on n=24 was y^=12.39+6.67x115.25x2 where x1=x and x2= x2. The article also reported that R2 for this model was .902. Does the quadratic model specify a useful relationship between y and x? Carry out the appropriate test using a .01 level of significance.

The ability of ecologists to identify regions of greatest species richness could have an impact on the preservation of genetic diversity, a major objective of the World Conservation Strategy. The article “Prediction of Rarities from Habitat Variables: Coastal Plain Plants on Nova Scotian Lakeshores" (Ecology [1992]: 1852 1859) used a sample of n=37 lakes to obtain the estimated regression equation y^=3.89+.033x1+.024x2+.023x3+.008x4.13x5.72x6 where y= species richness, x1= watershed area, x2= shore width, x3= drainage (%),x4= water color ( total color units), x5= sand (%), and x6= alkalinity. The coefficient of multiple determination was reported as R2=.83. Use a test with significance level .01 to decide whether the chosen model is useful.

The following statement appeared in the article “Dimensions of Adjustment Among College Women” (Journal of College Student Development [1998]: 364): Regression analyses indicated that academic adjustment and race made independent contributions to academic achievement, as measured by current GPA. Suppose y= current GPA x1= academicadjustment score x2= race ( with white =0, other =1) What multiple regression model is suggested by the statement? Did you include an interaction term in the model? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free