Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Obtain as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for the \(F\) test for model utility in each of the following situations: a. \(k=2, n=21,\) calculated \(F=2.47\) b. \(k=8, n=25,\) calculated \(F=5.98\) c. \(\quad k=5, n=26,\) calculated \(F=3.00\) d. The full quadratic model based on \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) is fit, \(n=20,\) and calculated \(F=8.25 .\) e. \(k=5, n=100,\) calculated \(F=2.33\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The exact P-values for these scenarios cannot be provided without either an F-statistic table or a statistical software package. Generally speaking, the smaller the P-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis of no model utility. Therefore, comparing the calculated F-statistics, one can say that scenario (d) will likely have the smallest P-value (hence the strongest evidence against the null), while scenario (e) will likely have the largest P-value (weakest evidence against the null). The exact P-values should be calculated for accurate results.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the variables

The first step is understanding what the variables in the exercise represent. Here, \(k\) represents the degrees of freedom which is the number of independent variables in the regression model. \(n\) is the total number of observations sampled, while the calculated \(F\) is the F-statistic obtained from the regression output.
02

Determine the degrees of freedom for the residuals

Next, for each scenario, calculate the degrees of freedom associated with the residuals. This can be done by subtracting \(k\) from \(n\). This is important since P-values are calculated using both the degrees of freedom associated with the independent variables and with the residuals.
03

Find the P-value

Now use a statistical software package or an F-distribution table to determine the P-value associated with the calculated F-statistic. One would need to know both sets of degrees of freedom (for the independent variables and the residuals) and the calculated F-statistic. Depending on the software, the procedure might slightly differ, but usually involves specifying the degrees of freedom and the F-statistic to return the P-value.
04

Repeat Step 2 and 3 for each scenario

Repeat this process for each of the five scenarios described in the exercise. Remember each situation is independent of the others.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value
The P-value is a critical concept in statistics, particularly in hypothesis testing. It helps us determine the significance of the results. A smaller P-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that the observed data is unlikely under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In the context of an F-test, the P-value tells us how compatible our dataset is with the null hypothesis that all coefficients of a regression model are equal to zero.

To calculate the P-value for an F-test, you need both the F-statistic and the relevant degrees of freedom. In general, statistical software can quickly compute the P-value. This involves determining how extreme the observed F-statistic is under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

Understanding P-values requires practice and interpretation. It is essential in guiding the decision-making process in statistical analyses. A P-value less than the chosen significance level (commonly 0.05) indicates that the results are statistically significant.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom are a key aspect of many statistical analyses, including the F-test. They represent the number of independent values or quantities that can vary in the data set while still adhering to the imposed constraints. In the context of an F-test, two kinds of degrees of freedom are important:

  • Degrees of freedom for the numerator ( related to the number of predictors or independent variables): equal to the number of independent variables in the regression model, denoted as \(k\).
  • Degrees of freedom for the denominator ( related to the residuals/errors): calculated as the total number of observations \(n\) minus the number of independent variables \(k\).
Degrees of freedom essentially measure the potential amount of variation in a data set, influencing the critical value from the statistical distribution that the test statistic is compared to. For instance, higher degrees of freedom typically lead to a more powerful test because they utilize more information from the data.
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is a powerful statistical method that allows us to examine the relationship between two or more variables. The primary purpose of regression analysis is to model the expected value of a dependent variable relative to independent variables. This analysis helps in predicting trends, determining strength and character of relationships, and identifying which independent variables have significant impacts.

In the context of an F-test, regression analysis addresses the overall significance of the model. Here, the null hypothesis suggests that none of the predictors are significant, meaning their coefficients are zero. If the F-statistic is larger than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis, indicating that at least one predictor is significantly related to the dependent variable.

Regression analysis is invaluable for determining the utility of a model and whether the independent variables collectively explain the variability in the dependent variable.
F-distribution
The F-distribution is a continuous probability distribution important in the F-test. It is defined by two different degrees of freedom: one for the numerator and one for the denominator. This distribution is used to compare variances and is inherent in analyzing the ratio of systematic variance to unsystematic variance.

The shape of the F-distribution depends on the degrees of freedom and is typically right-skewed. It helps in understanding whether the variability explained by the model is significant relative to the variability left unexplained. Researchers use the F-distribution to estimate the critical value and calculate the P-value.

When conducting an F-test, statistical software often employs the F-distribution to approximate the P-value and evaluate the significance of the test statistic. Understanding this distribution aids in the correct interpretation of the F-statistic and subsequent decision-making in regression analyses.
Statistical Software
Statistical software plays a crucial role in performing complex calculations required in regression analysis and F-tests. These tools, such as R, SPSS, or Python libraries, handle large datasets efficiently, ensuring accuracy and speed in computations.

When conducting an F-test, statistical software can swiftly compute the F-statistic, compare it against the F-distribution to derive the critical value, and then calculate the P-value. This technology helps users avoid manual errors and delivers insights through customizable output options.

Using statistical software not only saves time but also enhances the understanding of statistical concepts through visual outputs like graphs and charts. These features make it easier for students and researchers alike to interpret results, confirm hypotheses, and make informed decisions based on the data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a regression analysis with three independent variables \(x_{1}, x_{2}\), and \(x_{3}\). Give the equation for the following regression models: a. The model that includes as predictors all independent variables but no quadratic or interaction terms; b. The model that includes as predictors all independent variables and all quadratic terms; c. All models that include as predictors all independent variables, no quadratic terms, and exactly one interaction term; d. The model that includes as predictors all independent variables, all quadratic terms, and all interaction terms (the full quadratic model).

Data from a sample of \(n=150\) quail eggs were used to fit a multiple regression model relating $$ y=\text { eggshell surface area }\left(\mathrm{mm}^{2}\right) $$ \(x_{1}=\) egg weight \((\mathrm{g})\) \(x_{2}=e g g\) width \((\mathrm{mm})\) $$ x_{3}=\text { egg length }(\mathrm{mm}) $$ (“Predicting Yolk Height, Yolk Width, Albumen Length, Eggshell Weight, Egg Shape Index, Eggshell Thickness, Egg Surface Area of Japanese Quails Using Various Egg Traits as Regressors," International Journal of Poultry Science [2008]: 85-88). The resulting estimated regression function was $$ \begin{array}{l} 10.561+1.535 x_{1}-0.178 x_{2}-0.045 x_{3} \\ \text { and } R^{2}=.996 \end{array} $$ a. Carry out a model utility test to determine if this multiple regression model is useful. b. A simple linear regression model was also used to describe the relationship between \(y\) and \(x_{1}\), resulting in the estimated regression function \(6.254+1.387 x_{1}\). The \(P\) -value for the associated model utility test was reported to be less than .01 , and \(r^{2}=.994 .\) Is the linear model useful? Explain. c. Based on your answers to Parts (a) and (b), which of the two models would you recommend for predicting eggshell surface area? Explain the rationale for your choice.

The article “Readability of Liquid Crystal Displays: A Response Surface" (Human Factors [1983]: \(185-190\) ) used a multiple regression model with four independent variables, where \(y=\) error percentage for subjects reading a fourdigit liquid crystal display \(x_{1}=\) level of backlight (from 0 to \(\left.122 \mathrm{~cd} / \mathrm{m}\right)\) \(x_{2}=\) character subtense (from \(.025^{\circ}\) to \(\left.1.34^{\circ}\right)\) \(x_{3}=\) viewing angle \(\left(\right.\) from \(0^{\circ}\) to \(\left.60^{\circ}\right)\) \(x_{4}=\) level of ambient light (from 20 to \(1500 \mathrm{~lx}\) ) The model equation suggested in the article is \(y=1.52+.02 x_{1}-1.40 x_{2}+.02 x_{3}-.0006 x_{4}+e\) a. Assume that this is the correct equation. What is the mean value of \(y\) when \(x_{1}=10, x_{2}=.5, x_{3}=50\), and \(x_{4}=100 ?\) b. What mean error percentage is associated with a backlight level of 20 , character subtense of .5 , viewing angle of 10 , and ambient light level of 30 ? c. Interpret the values of \(\beta_{2}\) and \(\beta_{3}\).

The article "The Value and the Limitations of High-Speed Turbo-Exhausters for the Removal of Tar-Fog from Carburetted Water-Gas” (Society of Chemical Industry Journal [1946]: \(166-168\) ) presented data on \(y=\operatorname{tar}\) content (grains/100 \(\mathrm{ft}^{3}\) ) of a gas stream as a function of \(x_{1}=\) rotor speed (rev/minute) and \(x_{2}=\) gas inlet temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right) .\) A regression model using \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}=x_{2}^{2}\) and \(x_{4}=x_{1} x_{2}\) was suggested: $$ \text { mean } y \text { value }=86.8-.123 x_{1}+5.09 x_{2}-.0709 x_{3} $$ \(+.001 x_{4}\) a. According to this model, what is the mean \(y\) value if $$ x_{1}=3200 \text { and } x_{2}=57 ? $$ b. For this particular model, does it make sense to interpret the value of a \(\beta_{2}\) as the average change in tar content associated with a 1 -degree increase in gas inlet temperature when rotor speed is held constant? Explain.

The authors of the paper "Weight-Bearing Activity during Youth Is a More Important Factor for Peak Bone Mass than Calcium Intake" (Journal of Bone and Mineral Density [1994]: 1089-1096) used a multiple regression model to describe the relationship between $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { bone mineral density }\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\right) \\\ x_{1} &=\text { body weight }(\mathrm{kg}) \end{aligned} $$ \(x_{2}=\) a measure of weight-bearing activity, with higher values indicating greater activity a. The authors concluded that both body weight and weight-bearing activity were important predictors of bone mineral density and that there was no significant interaction between body weight and weightbearing activity. What multiple regression function is consistent with this description? b. The value of the coefficient of body weight in the multiple regression function given in the paper is 0.587. Interpret this value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free