Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Obtain as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for an upper-tailed \(F\) test in each of the following situations: a. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15,\) calculated \(F=4.23\) b. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=18,\) calculated \(F=1.95\) c. \(\quad \mathrm{df}_{1}=5, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20,\) calculated \(F=4.10\) d. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=35,\) calculated \(F=4.58\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
P-values will vary according to the F distribution table used. If the calculated F value falls beyond the critical F value in the table, we infer that P-value is less than the level of significance used to look up the critical F value. If our calculated F value is less than the critical F value in the table, then we infer that our P value is greater than the level of significance used to look up the critical F value. Without the actual F distribution table, it is not possible to give a specific P-value estimate.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the F distribution

This step involves understanding that the F distribution is skewed to the right, and not symmetrical. Its shape depends on the degrees of freedom, so it differs from situation to situation. There are F distribution tables that show the critical value for different alpha levels and different degrees of freedom.
02

Locate critical value in the table

For each of the scenarios, the F distribution table must be consulted to find the P-value. From the table, identify the row corresponding to \(df_1\) and the column indexed by \(df_2\). The location where the row and column intersect is the critical value of the F distribution, denoted \(F_{crit}\).
03

Calculate P-value

From the table value obtained in step 2, determine if the calculated F value is greater or less than the critical value \(F_{crit}\). If the computed F value is greater than \(F_{crit}\), this suggests that the calculated p-value is less than the level of significance used to look up \(F_{crit}\). If the computed F is less than \(F_{crit}\), then the p-value is greater than the level of significance used. Note not all F distribution tables show actual probability (P-value), however using the method mentioned can give an estimate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F Distribution
The F distribution is a probability distribution that appears in analysis of variance (ANOVA) and tests of equality of variances. One key feature of the F distribution is that it is not symmetrical—it is skewed to the right. This means there is a longer tail on the right side, affecting how values are distributed across the range.

The shape of the F distribution is determined by two different types of "degrees of freedom" which are associated with the numerator and the denominator in the F-test calculations. Because of this, the curve can vary greatly based on the context of the data being analyzed. It can be helpful to visualize the F distribution as a family of curves that change shape depending on these degrees of freedom. Understanding the unique characteristics of the F distribution helps us interpret statistical tests effectively, especially as it is used to compare two variability sources in the context of hypothesis testing.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) are integral to understanding the F distribution and its behavior. In an F-test, degrees of freedom are specified in two ways: one for the numerator (df1) and one for the denominator (df2).

Essentially, degrees of freedom refer to the number of independent values or quantities available to estimate another statistic or parameter. They play a crucial role in determining how spread out the F distribution is. For example:
  • High degrees of freedom in the numerator result in a less peaked distribution.
  • High degrees of freedom in the denominator make the distribution closer to normal.

Degrees of freedom arise from the sample sizes and the structure of the data, impacting both the critical value from the F distribution and the interpretation of statistical tests.
Critical Value
The critical value is a point on the scale of the test statistic beyond which we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. For F-tests, critical values are extracted from F distribution tables based on the selected significance level and degrees of freedom.

Critical values serve as a threshold to decide if our sample data indicates a significant effect or not. Let's break down the process of finding a critical value:
  • First, identify the significance level (usually denoted by \( \alpha \), such as 0.05 or 5%).
  • Next, locate the row for the numerator degrees of freedom (df1) in the F distribution table, and a column for the denominator degrees of freedom (df2).
  • The point where these intersect provides the critical value \( F_{crit} \).

If the calculated F statistic from a test exceeds this critical value, we may conclude that there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis, showing that a significant difference or effect exists.
Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, the significance level is a threshold risk we are willing to take of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis, this is often represented by \( \alpha \). Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10, meaning 5%, 1%, or 10% risk respectively.

The significance level is chosen by the researcher before the test begins and is crucial because it influences the critical value extracted from the F distribution table. This level decides the **stringency** of the test:
  • A lower significance level (e.g., 0.01) means stricter testing criteria, reducing the probability of false positives.
  • A higher significance level (e.g., 0.10) allows for more false positives, increasing the chance of detecting a true effect when one exists.

Understanding the significance level helps explain how and why we decide to reject or not reject the null hypothesis during statistical testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article “Readability of Liquid Crystal Displays: A Response Surface" (Human Factors [1983]: \(185-190\) ) used a multiple regression model with four independent variables, where \(y=\) error percentage for subjects reading a fourdigit liquid crystal display \(x_{1}=\) level of backlight (from 0 to \(\left.122 \mathrm{~cd} / \mathrm{m}\right)\) \(x_{2}=\) character subtense (from \(.025^{\circ}\) to \(\left.1.34^{\circ}\right)\) \(x_{3}=\) viewing angle \(\left(\right.\) from \(0^{\circ}\) to \(\left.60^{\circ}\right)\) \(x_{4}=\) level of ambient light (from 20 to \(1500 \mathrm{~lx}\) ) The model equation suggested in the article is \(y=1.52+.02 x_{1}-1.40 x_{2}+.02 x_{3}-.0006 x_{4}+e\) a. Assume that this is the correct equation. What is the mean value of \(y\) when \(x_{1}=10, x_{2}=.5, x_{3}=50\), and \(x_{4}=100 ?\) b. What mean error percentage is associated with a backlight level of 20 , character subtense of .5 , viewing angle of 10 , and ambient light level of 30 ? c. Interpret the values of \(\beta_{2}\) and \(\beta_{3}\).

Suppose that the variables \(y, x_{1},\) and \(x_{2}\) are related by the regression model \(y=1.8+.1 x_{1}+.8 x_{2}+e\) a. Construct a graph (similar to that of Figure 14.5\()\) showing the relationship between mean \(y\) and \(x_{2}\) for fixed values \(10,20,\) and 30 of \(x_{1}\). b. Construct a graph depicting the relationship between mean \(y\) and \(x_{1}\) for fixed values \(50,55,\) and 60 of \(x_{2}\). c. What aspect of the graphs in Parts (a) and (b) can be attributed to the lack of an interaction between \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) ? d. Suppose the interaction term \(.03 x_{3}\) where \(x_{3}=x_{1} x_{2}\) is added to the regression model equation. Using this new model, construct the graphs described in Parts (a) and (b). How do they differ from those obtained in Parts (a) and (b)?

According to “Assessing the Validity of the Post-Materialism Index" (American Political Science Review [1999]: \(649-664\) ), one may be able to predict an individual's level of support for ecology based on demographic and ideological characteristics. The multiple regression model proposed by the authors was $$ \begin{aligned} y=& 3.60-.01 x_{1}+.01 x_{2}-.07 x_{3}+.12 x_{4}+.02 x_{5} \\ &-.04 x_{6}-.01 x_{7}-.04 x_{8}-.02 x_{9}+e \end{aligned} $$ where the variables are defined as follows: \(y=\) ecology score (higher values indicate a greater concern for ecology) \(x_{1}=\) age times 10 \(x_{2}=\) income (in thousands of dollars) \(x_{3}=\) gender \((1=\) male \(, 0=\) female \()\) \(x_{4}=\operatorname{race}(1=\) white \(, 0=\) nonwhite \()\) \(x_{5}=\) education (in years) \(x_{6}=\) ideology \((4=\) conservative, \(3=\) right of center, \(2=\) middle of the road, \(1=\) left of center, and \(0=\) liberal) \(\begin{aligned} x_{7}=& \text { social class }(4=\text { upper, } 3=\text { upper middle, }\\\ & 2=\text { middle }, 1=\text { lower middle, and } \\ &0=\text { lower }) \end{aligned}\) \(x_{8}=\) postmaterialist ( 1 if postmaterialist, 0 otherwise) \(x_{9}=\) materialist (1 if materialist, 0 otherwise) a. Suppose you knew a person with the following characteristics: a 25 -year- old, white female with a college degree (16 years of education), who has a \(\$ 32,000\) -peryear job, is from the upper middle class, and considers herself left of center, but who is neither a materialist nor a postmaterialist. Predict her ecology score. b. If the woman described in Part (a) were Hispanic rather than white, how would the prediction change? c. Given that the other variables are the same, what is the estimated mean difference in ecology score for men and women? d. How would you interpret the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) ? e. Comment on the numerical coding of the ideology and social class variables. Can you suggest a better way of incorporating these two variables into the model?

This exercise requires the use of a computer package. The accompanying data resulted from a study of the relationship between \(y=\) brightness of finished paper and the independent variables \(x_{1}=\) hydrogen peroxide \((\%\) by weight), \(x_{2}=\) sodium hydroxide (\% by weight), \(x_{3}=\) silicate (\% by weight), and \(x_{4}=\) process temperature (“Advantages of CE-HDP Bleaching for High Brightness Kraft Pulp Production," TAPPI [1964]: \(107 \mathrm{~A}-173 \mathrm{~A})\). a. Find the estimated regression equation for the model that includes all independent variables, all quadratic terms, and all interaction terms. b. Using a .05 significance level, perform the model utility test. c. Interpret the values of the following quantities: SSResid, \(R^{2},\) and \(s_{e}\)

The relationship between yield of maize, date of planting, and planting density was investigated in the article “Development of a Model for Use in Maize Replant Decisions” (Agronomy Journal [1980]: \(459-464)\). Let $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { percent maize yield } \\ x_{1} &=\text { planting date }(\text { days after } \text { April } 20) \\ x_{2} &=\text { planting density }(10,000 \text { plants } / \mathrm{ha}) \end{aligned} $$ The regression model with both quadratic terms \((y=\alpha\) $$ +\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\beta_{3} x_{3}+\beta_{4} x_{4}+e \text { where } x_{3}=x_{1}^{2} $$ and \(x_{4}=x_{2}^{2}\) ) provides a good description of the relationship between \(y\) and the independent variables. a. If \(\alpha=21.09, \beta_{1}=.653, \beta_{2}=.0022, \beta_{3}=2.0206\), and \(\beta_{4}=0.4\), what is the population regression function? b. Use the regression function in Part (a) to determine the mean yield for a plot planted on May 6 with a density of 41,180 plants/ha. c. Would the mean yield be higher for a planting date of May 6 or May 22 (for the same density)? d. Is it legitimate to interpret \(\beta_{1}=.653\) as the average change in yield when planting date increases by one day and the values of the other three predictors are held fixed? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free