Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The paper "Ready or Not? Criteria for Marriage Readiness among Emerging Adults" (Journal of \(\underline{\text { Ado- }}\) lescent Research [2009]: 349-375) surveyed emerging adults (defined as age 18 to 25 ) from five different colleges in the United States. Several questions on the survey were used to construct a scale designed to measure endorsement of cohabitation. The paper states that "on average, emerging adult men \((\mathrm{M}=3.75, \mathrm{SD}=1.21)\) reported higher levels of cohabitation endorsement than emerging adult women \((\mathrm{M}=3.39, \mathrm{SD}=1.17) . "\) The sample sizes were 481 for women and 307 for men. a. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the reported difference in sample means provides convincing evidence that the mean cohabitation endorsement for emerging adult women is significantly less than the mean for emerging adult men for students at these five colleges. b. What additional information would you want in order to determine whether it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the hypothesis test from Part (a) to all college students?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The outcome of the hypothesis test will determine if there is evidence that the mean cohabitation endorsement for emerging adult women is significantly less than the mean for emerging adult men. To generalize the conclusion to all college students, additional information such as sampling methods, non-response biases, and college diversity would be required.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) is that the mean cohabitation endorsement of emerging adult men and women are equal. The alternate hypothesis \(H_a\) is that the mean cohabitation endorsement of emerging adult women is less than emerging adult men:\n\n\( H_0 : \mu_{men} = \mu_{women} \)\n\n\( H_a : \mu_{men} > \mu_{women} \)
02

Compute Test Statistic

The test statistic for a two-sample t-test can be calculated by the following formula: \n\n\[ t = \frac{{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2)}}{{\sqrt{(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2})}}} \]\n\nSubstitute the given values into the formula: \n\n\[ t = \frac{{(3.39 - 3.75) - 0}}{{\sqrt{(\frac{1.17^2}{481} + \frac{1.21^2}{307})}}} \]
03

Determine the p-value

Use the calculated t statistic to find the p-value from a t-distribution table. The degrees of freedom would be the smaller of \( n_1 - 1 \) and \( n_2 - 1 \), which is \( 307 - 1 = 306 \). If p-value is less than 0.05 (5% significance level), reject the null hypothesis.
04

Conclude the Hypothesis Test

If the p-value is less than the significance level (0.05), would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the mean cohabitation endorsement for emerging adult women is significantly less than the mean for emerging adult men among the students at these five colleges.
05

Additional Information

In order to generalize the conclusion to all college students, information regarding the selection of students - specifically, if the sample selected was random without biases or if it is representative of all college students of emerging adult age - would be needed. Additionally, information about the survey's response rate and whether there's a potential non-response bias could be valuable. Finally, understanding if the five colleges involved in the study represent the overall diversity of all colleges is essential.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cohabitation Endorsement
In the context of the study, cohabitation endorsement refers to the extent to which individuals agree with or support the idea of living together without being married. This concept can vary widely, influenced by cultural, educational, and personal beliefs.
The survey in question used a series of questions to gauge cohabitation endorsement among emerging adults. It’s important to understand how endorsement levels might impact societal norms and relationship dynamics among this age group.
Understanding cohabitation endorsement is vital, as it reflects broader social trends and can affect attitudes towards marriage and traditional family structures. As societal views on marriage evolve, the endorsement may vary significantly among different demographic groups, including gender differences as observed in the study.
Emerging Adults
The term emerging adults refers to individuals typically aged 18 to 25 who are transitioning from adolescence to adulthood. This period is characterized by exploration and self-discovery.
According to developmental psychologists, emerging adults are exploring their identities, career paths, and relationships. This unique stage of life can lead to distinctive attitudes and behaviors, such as differences in cohabitation endorsement.
The study highlighted that emerging adults at several U.S. colleges perceive cohabitation differently, which may stem from their ongoing identity exploration and the changing societal norms around this age group. Understanding their outlook can provide insights into future societal trends and potential shifts in marriage and family patterns.
Sample Means Comparison
Sample means comparison involves statistically comparing the average (mean) results of different groups to determine if there are significant differences. This is often done using hypothesis testing.
In the study, the hypothesis test aimed to compare the mean cohabitation endorsements between men and women. A t-test was used to see if emerging adult men had a higher endorsement score than women.
The formula for the t-statistic compares the means and considers the variances and sample sizes of both groups. This approach helps determine if the observed differences are statistically significant or merely due to random chance, enabling us to draw conclusions about the population from which the sample was drawn.
P-Value Interpretation
The p-value is a crucial component in hypothesis testing, representing the probability that the observed data would occur if the null hypothesis is true.
In the context of the study, the p-value helps determine whether the difference in cohabitation endorsement between men and women is statistically significant. A low p-value (typically less than 0.05) indicates that the observed difference is unlikely due to chance alone, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.
Interpreting the p-value correctly is essential for making informed decisions based on the data. In this study, if the p-value is below the threshold, it suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the conclusion that men and women differ significantly in their levels of cohabitation endorsement.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do" (Psychological Science [2008]\(: 986-988)\) described an interesting study of how people perceive the effort required to do certain tasks. Each of 20 students was randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group was given instructions for an exercise routine that were printed in an easy-to-read font (Arial). The other group received the same set of instructions, but printed in a font that is considered difficult to read (Brush). After reading the instructions, subjects estimated the time (in minutes) they thought it would take to complete the exercise routine. Summary statistics are given below. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} & \text { Easy font } & \text { Difficult font } \\ \hline n & 10 & 10 \\ \bar{x} & 8.23 & 15.10 \\ s & 5.61 & 9.28 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The authors of the paper used these data to carry out a two-sample \(t\) test, and concluded that at the .10 significance level, there was convincing evidence that the mean estimated time to complete the exercise routine was less when the instructions were printed in an easy-to-read font than when printed in a difficult-to-read font. Discuss the appropriateness of using a two-sample \(t\) test in this situation.

An individual can take either a scenic route to work or a nonscenic route. She decides that use of the nonscenic route can be justified only if it reduces the mean travel time by more than 10 minutes. a. If \(\mu_{1}\) is the mean for the scenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) for the nonscenic route, what hypotheses should be tested? b. If \(\mu_{1}\) is the mean for the nonscenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) for the scenic route, what hypotheses should be tested?

After the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, many charitable organizations conducted fundraising campaigns to raise money for emergency relief. Some of these campaigns allowed people to donate by sending a text message using a cell phone to have the donated amount added to their cell-phone bill. The report "Early Signals on Mobile Philanthropy: Is Haiti the Tipping Point?" (Edge Research, 2010 ) describes the results of a national survey of 1526 people that investigated the ways in which people made donations to the Haiti relief effort. The report states that \(17 \%\) of Gen \(Y\) respondents (those born between 1980 and 1988 ) and \(14 \%\) of Gen \(X\) respondents (those born between 1968 and 1979 ) said that they had made a donation to the Haiti relief effort via text message. The percentage making a donation via text message was much lower for older respondents. The report did not say how many respondents were in the Gen \(\mathrm{Y}\) and Gen \(\mathrm{X}\) samples, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that both sample sizes were 400 and that it is reasonable to regard the samples as representative of the Gen \(\mathrm{Y}\) and Gen \(\mathrm{X}\) populations. a. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of those in Gen Y who donated to Haiti relief via text message is greater than the proportion for Gen X? Use \(\alpha=.01\). b. Estimate the difference between the proportion of Gen \(\mathrm{Y}\) and the proportion of Gen \(\mathrm{X}\) that made a donation via text message using a \(99 \%\) confidence interval. Provide an interpretation of both the interval and the associated confidence level.

Women diagnosed with breast cancer whose tumors have not spread may be faced with a decision between two surgical treatments - mastectomy (removal of the breast) or lumpectomy (only the tumor is removed). In a long-term study of the effectiveness of these two treatments, 701 women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group received mastectomies and the other group received lumpectomies and radiation. Both groups were followed for 20 years after surgery. It was reported that there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion surviving for 20 years for the two treatments (Associated Press, October 17,2002 ). What hypotheses do you think the researchers tested in order to reach the given conclusion? Did the researchers reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree- \(43 \%\) versus \(25 \%\)." For purposes of this exercise, suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is higher for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Answer based on a test with a .05 significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free