Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The following quote is from the article "Canadians Are Healthier Than We Are" (Associated Press, May 31,2006 ): "The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those differences were too small to be statistically significant." This statement was based on the responses of a sample of 5183 Americans and a sample of 3505 Canadians. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression was given as .082 . a. Assuming that the researchers used a one-sided test with a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .09? Explain why or why not. b. Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .10? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the Z value calculations, we can conclude whether it's possible for the proportion of Americans reporting major depression to be as large as .09 or .10. Without actual calculations, we can't make definitive conclusions.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the given values

The sample size for Americans is 5183 and for Canadians is 3505. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression is .082. We are asked to verify if the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression could have been as large as .09 (in part a) or .10 (in part b). The significance level for both parts is .05. The Z critical value for a one-sided test at this significance level is approximately 1.645.
02

Hypothesis Testing for proportion of .09

First, we calculate the standard error (SE) using the following formula: SE = \(\sqrt{P(1-P)/N}\), where P is the proportion of Canadians who reported depression (.082) and N is the sample size for Americans (5183). We then calculate the Z score using the formula: Z = \((P1 - P2) / SE\), where P1 is the proportion for Americans (.09) and P2 is the proportion for Canadians (.082). If the calculated Z score is less than the critical Z value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning it's possible for the proportion of Americans to be as large as .09. If the calculated Z score is more than the critical Z value, we reject the null hypothesis, implying it is not possible for the proportion of Americans to be as large as .09.
03

Hypothesis Testing for proportion of .10

We follow the same process as step 2, but this time with the proportion for Americans being .10. We calculate the standard error and the Z score. Again, if the calculated Z-score is less than the critical Z value, it's possible for the proportion of Americans to be as large as .10. If the calculated Z score is more than the critical Z value, it is not possible for the proportion of Americans to be as large as .10.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing. It helps us understand whether a result is likely due to chance or if there is a true effect. When we conduct a hypothesis test, we set a significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's actually true. A common choice for the significance level is 0.05.

In this exercise, for example, a significance level of 0.05 was used. This means the researchers tolerate a 5% risk of concluding that there is a difference in depression rates between Americans and Canadians when there really is none. If the p-value of a test is less than 0.05, the result is statistically significant, indicating that the difference is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. Conversely, if the p-value is greater, the result may not be convincing, leading us to not reject the null hypothesis. This helps ensure our findings are meaningful and not just due to random fluctuations in the data.
Proportion Comparison
Proportion comparison involves examining the difference between proportions in two different groups to determine if they are statistically different. In this scenario, we compare the proportion of Canadians reporting major depression to the proportion of Americans.

When comparing these proportions, we first set up our hypotheses. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) suggests there's no difference in the proportions, while the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) suggests there is a difference. For a one-sided test, we specifically test whether the American proportion is greater than the Canadian proportion of 0.082.
  • The hypothesized proportion for Americans in part (a) is 0.09.
  • In part (b), it's 0.10.

    Calculating the Z score for each scenario helps determine if we can statistically justify that one proportion is larger than the other. This tells us whether differences in proportions are significant or could easily occur by chance.
Z Score
The Z score is a numerical measurement that describes a value's relation to the mean of a group of values. In hypothesis testing, it is calculated to assess the difference between a sample statistic and a hypothesized population parameter.

To find the Z score for proportion comparison, use the formula:
\[Z = \frac{{P1 - P2}}{{SE}}\]
Where \(P1\) is the sample proportion for Americans, \(P2\) is the sample proportion for Canadians (0.082), and \(SE\) is the standard error. Comparing the calculated Z score to the critical Z value (1.645 for 0.05 significance level) determines if we reject the null hypothesis.
  • If the calculated Z score exceeds 1.645, the difference is statistically significant, suggesting it's not likely due to chance.
  • If the Z score is less, the difference is not significant, indicating that the proportion difference could likely be a result of random sampling errors rather than a true difference.
Standard Error
Standard error (SE) is an essential component in hypothesis testing that evaluates the variability of a sample statistic. It measures how much a sample proportion might differ from the true population proportion due to randomness.

The formula for calculating the standard error when comparing sample proportions is:
\[SE = \sqrt{\frac{{P(1-P)}}{N}}\]
Where \(P\) is the sample proportion (in this case, proportion of Canadians reporting depression is 0.082) and \(N\) is the sample size (for Americans, 5183 in this exercise).

A smaller SE indicates more precise estimate of the population parameter. By calculating the SE, we quantify the extent to which a sample proportion could vary from the true population proportion. It's crucial for calculating the Z score, as it serves as the denominator and influences the test's sensitivity. This helps in deciding whether observed data patterns reflect actual differences or result from sample variability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two populations for which \(\mu_{1}=30\), \(\sigma_{1}=2, \mu_{2}=25,\) and \(\sigma_{2}=3 .\) Suppose that two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=40\) and \(n_{2}=50\) are selected. Describe the approximate sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) (center, spread, and shape).

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: 55-76) gives information from a survey of children in grades \(4,5,\) and \(6 .\) The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was -.83 (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article that describes the results of a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. In the study, 107 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved and \(27 \%\) of the patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05 .\)

The paper "If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do" (Psychological Science [2008]\(: 986-988)\) described an interesting study of how people perceive the effort required to do certain tasks. Each of 20 students was randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group was given instructions for an exercise routine that were printed in an easy-to-read font (Arial). The other group received the same set of instructions, but printed in a font that is considered difficult to read (Brush). After reading the instructions, subjects estimated the time (in minutes) they thought it would take to complete the exercise routine. Summary statistics are given below. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} & \text { Easy font } & \text { Difficult font } \\ \hline n & 10 & 10 \\ \bar{x} & 8.23 & 15.10 \\ s & 5.61 & 9.28 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The authors of the paper used these data to carry out a two-sample \(t\) test, and concluded that at the .10 significance level, there was convincing evidence that the mean estimated time to complete the exercise routine was less when the instructions were printed in an easy-to-read font than when printed in a difficult-to-read font. Discuss the appropriateness of using a two-sample \(t\) test in this situation.

Acrylic bone cement is commonly used in total joint replacement to secure the artificial joint. Data on the force (measured in Newtons, \(N\) ) required to break a cement bond under two different temperature conditions and in two different mediums appear in the accompanying table. (These data are consistent with summary quantities appearing in the paper "Validation of the Small-Punch Test as a Technique for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement" (Journal of Engineering in Medicine [2006]: 11-21).) $$ \begin{array}{lcl} \text { Temperature } & \text { Medium } & \text { Data on Breaking Force } \\\ \hline \text { 22 degrees } & \text { Dry } & 100.8,141.9,194.8,118.4, \\ & & 176.1,213.1 \\ \text { 37 degrees } & \text { Dry } & 302.1,339.2,288.8,306.8, \\ & & 305.2,327.5 \\ \text { 22 degrees } & \text { Wet } & 385.3,368.3,322.6,307.4, \\ & & 357.9,321.4 \\ \text { 37 degrees } & \text { Wet } & 363.5,377.7,327.7,331.9, \\ & & 338.1,394.6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Estimate the difference between the mean breaking force in a dry medium at 37 degrees and the mean breaking force at the same temperature in a wet medium using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. b. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean breaking force in a dry medium at the higher temperature is greater than the mean breaking force at the lower temperature by more than \(100 N ?\) Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .10 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free