Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Public Agenda conducted a survey of 1379 parents and 1342 students in grades \(6-12\) regarding the importance of science and mathematics in the school curriculum (Associated Press, February \(15,2 \mathrm{OO} 6\) ). It was reported that \(50 \%\) of students thought that understanding science and having strong math skills are essential for them to succeed in life after school, whereas \(62 \%\) of the parents thought it was crucial for today's students to learn science and higher-level math. The two samples - parents and students -were selected independently of one another. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of parents who regard science and mathematics as crucial is different than the corresponding proportion for students in grades \(6-12 ?\) Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .05 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
Depending on the value of the z-score calculated in Step 2 and compared to the critical value in Step 3, a conclusion is drawn whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis. If the z-score is greater than ± 1.96, the null hypothesis is rejected, implying there is a significant difference between the two proportions. If not, the null hypothesis is not rejected implying there is no significant difference between the two proportions. The final conclusion can only be given after doing the calculations.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate both hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that there is no difference between the proportions of parents and students who think that understanding math and science is important, i.e., \(p_1 = p_2\). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that there is a significant difference in the proportions, i.e., \(p_1 \neq p_2\). Here, \(p_1\) represents the proportion of parents and \(p_2\) represents the proportion of students.
02

Compute the test statistic

The test statistic z is calculated using the formula: \(z = \frac{(p_1 - p_2) - 0}{sqrt(\bar{p}(1 - \bar{p}){[\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}]})}\), where \(\bar{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} \), \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are the number of successes (yes responses) in each sample, and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes. For our case, \(n_1 = 1379\), \(n_2 = 1342\), \(x_1 = 0.62 * 1379\), \(x_2 = 0.50 * 1342\). After calculating these values, we can substitute them into the formula and find the z-score.
03

Determine the critical value and make decision

The critical value for a two-tailed test at a significance level of 0.05 is approximately ± 1.96. If the calculated z-score is greater than 1.96 or less than -1.96, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject it.
04

Conclusion

Depend on the calculated z-score and the result of step 3, Draw a conclusion in context of the problem, whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of parents who think science and maths are crucial is different from the proportion of students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, symbolized as \(H_0\), is the starting point of hypothesis testing. It reflects the assumption of no effect, no difference, or no change. In the context of our survey, the null hypothesis asserts that there is no difference between the proportion of parents and students who deem mathematics and science as critical for post-school success. Mathematically, this can be expressed as \(p_1 = p_2\), where \(p_1\) is the proportion of parents and \(p_2\) is the proportion of students.
For hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis acts as the default stance that researchers aim to challenge. It is accepted unless there is strong evidence to the contrary. This assumption of "no difference" ensures that any claim of significant variation is well-supported by data.
When conducting a hypothesis test, we strive to either "reject" or "fail to reject" the null hypothesis, based on the calculated evidence from the data. A common misconception is that "failing to reject" equates to proving the null hypothesis true. Instead, it simply means the evidence was insufficient to confirm a difference.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, or \(H_1\), presents a statement opposing the null hypothesis. In our scenario, it proposes that there is a significant difference between the attitudes of parents and students regarding the importance of math and science, expressed as \(p_1 eq p_2\).
The alternative hypothesis is instrumental in framing what you are seeking to prove. It represents the possibility that there indeed exists a notable difference or effect, initiating further exploration. If the data provides enough evidence, the alternative hypothesis becomes more plausible than the null.
In hypothesis testing, a critical part of the process is to determine whether we have enough proof to support this alternative perspective. It's important to note that supporting the alternative hypothesis involves rejecting the null hypothesis, indicating a significant finding.
Test Statistic
A test statistic is a standardized value derived from sample data. It allows comparison against a probability distribution to assess the evidence against a null hypothesis. In our survey task, we utilize the z-test statistic, suitable for comparing proportions. It calculates how far the observed difference in proportions (parent's and student's perceptions of math and science importance) is from the null hypothesis of no difference, in standard deviation units.
The formula for the z-statistic is:\[ z = \frac{(p_1 - p_2)}{\sqrt{\overline{p}(1 - \overline{p}) \left[ \frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2} \right]}} \]where:
  • \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) are the sample proportions
  • \(\overline{p}\) is the pooled sample proportion
  • \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes
By calculating the z-score, you can gauge the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. A larger absolute value of this statistic suggests a stronger case against it.
Significance Level
The significance level, typically denoted as \(\alpha\), establishes a threshold for decision-making in hypothesis testing. It answers the question: "How much risk of making a Type I error am I willing to tolerate?" A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected. Therefore, the significance level embodies the probability of such a mistake.
For example, a significance level of 0.05 (commonly used) implies a 5% risk of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true. This means that the results must be so compelling that there's less than a 5% chance they happened due to random variability.
In our example, setting a significance level of 0.05 helped determine whether the computed z-score fell into the "rejection zone" of ±1.96 (approximate critical values for a two-tailed test). If the test statistic surpasses these critical values, the null hypothesis is rejected, confirming that there is a notable difference between the perspectives of parents and students on the criticality of maths and science.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A hotel chain is interested in evaluating reservation processes. Guests can reserve a room by using either a telephone system or an online system that is accessed through the hotel's web site. Independent random samples of 80 guests who reserved a room by phone and 60 guests who reserved a room online were selected. Of those who reserved by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the reservation process. Of those who reserved online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is higher for those who reserve a room online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\)

Two different underground pipe coatings for preventing corrosion are to be compared. The effect of a coating (as measured by maximum depth of corrosion penetration on a piece of pipe) may vary with depth, orientation, soil type, pipe composition, etc. Describe how an experiment that filters out the effects of these extraneous factors could be carried out.

The following quote is from the article "Canadians Are Healthier Than We Are" (Associated Press, May 31,2006 ): "The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those differences were too small to be statistically significant." This statement was based on the responses of a sample of 5183 Americans and a sample of 3505 Canadians. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression was given as .082 . a. Assuming that the researchers used a one-sided test with a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .09? Explain why or why not. b. Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .10? Explain why or why not.

In the experiment described in the paper "Exposure to Diesel Exhaust Induces Changes in EEG in Human Volunteers" (Particle and Fibre Toxicology [2007])\(, 10\) healthy men were exposed to diesel exhaust for 1 hour. A measure of brain activity (called median power frequency, or MPF) was recorded at two different locations in the brain both before and after the diesel exhaust exposure. The resulting data are given in the accompanying table. For purposes of this example, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of 10 men as representative of healthy adult males. $$ \begin{array}{ccrcr} \hline & \text { Location 1 } & \text { Location 1 } & \text { Location 2 } & \text { Location 2 } \\ \text { Subject } & \text { Before } & \text { After } & \text { Before } & \text { After } \\ \hline 1 & 6.4 & 8.0 & 6.9 & 9.4 \\ 2 & 8.7 & 12.6 & 9.5 & 11.2 \\ 3 & 7.4 & 8.4 & 6.7 & 10.2 \\ 4 & 8.7 & 9.0 & 9.0 & 9.6 \\ 5 & 9.8 & 8.4 & 9.7 & 9.2 \\ 6 & 8.9 & 11.0 & 9.0 & 11.9 \\ 7 & 9.3 & 14.4 & 7.9 & 9.1 \\ 8 & 7.4 & 11.3 & 8.3 & 9.3 \\ 9 & 6.6 & 7.1 & 7.2 & 8.0 \\ 10 & 8.9 & 11.2 & 7.4 & 9.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean MPF at brain location 1 is higher after diesel exposure? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05 .\) b. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate for the difference in mean MPF at brain location 2 before and after exposure to diesel exhaust.

After the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, many charitable organizations conducted fundraising campaigns to raise money for emergency relief. Some of these campaigns allowed people to donate by sending a text message using a cell phone to have the donated amount added to their cell-phone bill. The report "Early Signals on Mobile Philanthropy: Is Haiti the Tipping Point?" (Edge Research, 2010 ) describes the results of a national survey of 1526 people that investigated the ways in which people made donations to the Haiti relief effort. The report states that \(17 \%\) of Gen \(Y\) respondents (those born between 1980 and 1988 ) and \(14 \%\) of Gen \(X\) respondents (those born between 1968 and 1979 ) said that they had made a donation to the Haiti relief effort via text message. The percentage making a donation via text message was much lower for older respondents. The report did not say how many respondents were in the Gen \(\mathrm{Y}\) and Gen \(\mathrm{X}\) samples, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that both sample sizes were 400 and that it is reasonable to regard the samples as representative of the Gen \(\mathrm{Y}\) and Gen \(\mathrm{X}\) populations. a. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of those in Gen Y who donated to Haiti relief via text message is greater than the proportion for Gen X? Use \(\alpha=.01\). b. Estimate the difference between the proportion of Gen \(\mathrm{Y}\) and the proportion of Gen \(\mathrm{X}\) that made a donation via text message using a \(99 \%\) confidence interval. Provide an interpretation of both the interval and the associated confidence level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free