Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA Today, February 2, 2O1O ) describes a study in which 81 patients age 13 to 25 who were considered atrisk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. The other group took a placebo. After 1 year, 5% of those in the fish oil group and 28% of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the two-sample z test of this section to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, it is not appropriate to use the two-sample z-test because the condition for normality isn't satisfied. The sample doesn't meet the criteria requiring at least 10 successes and 10 failures.

Step by step solution

01

Checking the Randomization Condition

Randomization is a basic condition for most statistical tests. In the problem, it's stated that the patients were randomly assigned to the fish oil or placebo groups, hence satisfying this condition.
02

Checking the Normal Condition

The normal condition requires that we should expect at least 10 successes and 10 failures in our sample. For the fish oil group, there were 81×5%=4.05 psychotic incidents (successes) and 81×95%=76.95 non-psychotic incidents (failures). In the placebo group, there were 81×28%=22.68 psychotic incidents (successes) and 81×72%=58.32 non-psychotic incidents (failures). Hence, both conditions are not met as the number of successes and failures are not all above 10.
03

Conclusion

Since the normal condition isn't met, it isn't appropriate to utilize the two-sample z-test for this problem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-sample z-test
The two-sample z-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the proportions of two independent groups. In simple terms, this test compares the difference in success rates between two groups to see if this difference is due to chance or if it reflects a real difference in behavior or outcome.
When conducting a two-sample z-test, we assume that both samples (or groups) follow a normal distribution. This means that the data should reflect the typical bell-shaped curve when plotted.
  • The test requires the data to meet certain conditions, such as random sampling and adequate sample size.
  • It uses a z-distribution (which is why it's named a z-test) to estimate the probability of observing the given difference if the null hypothesis is true.
  • Common null hypothesis assumes no difference between the groups' proportions.
In the case of comparing the effects of fish oil and a placebo in preventing psychosis, the two-sample z-test would analyze if there is a statistically significant difference in the proportion of psychotic cases between the two groups.
Randomization
Randomization is the process of randomly assigning participants to different groups in an experiment to ensure that each group is similar across all characteristics except for the factor being tested. This helps to eliminate bias and confounding variables, which can skew results and conclusions.
In the fish oil study, participants were randomly assigned to either the fish oil group or the placebo group. This step is crucial as it ensures that any differences in outcomes between groups can be attributed to the treatment effect rather than other variables.
  • Randomization improves the reliability of the study results.
  • It helps in balancing both known and unknown factors across the groups.
  • It allows for the generalization of the findings to a broader population.
With random assignment, the study guarantees that any psychological or physiological differences between participants do not systematically affect the outcome, thereby fulfilling the randomization condition needed for statistical tests like the two-sample z-test.
Normal Condition
The normal condition refers to the assumption that the sampling distribution of the difference between two proportions is approximately normal, which is crucial for the accuracy of the z-test. For this approximation to be valid, we need each group's expected number of successes and failures to be at least 10.
In mathematical terms, if
  • n1×p110 and n1×(1p1)10
  • n2×p210 and n2×(1p2)10
are true, where n1 and n2 are the sample sizes, and p1 and p2 are the sample proportions.
In the study mentioned, the fish oil group does not meet the normal condition since it has less than 10 expected successes. Due to this, the sampling distribution might not be normal, which suggests that the two-sample z-test may not be appropriate. This highlights the importance of checking assumptions before conducting statistical tests.
Proportion Comparison
Proportion comparison involves determining whether there is a significant difference between the proportions of success (or failure) in two different groups. It is a common analysis in research, especially in fields like medicine and social sciences, where understanding group differences is crucial.
For example, in the fish oil study, researchers want to compare the proportion of psychotic outcomes between participants taking fish oil and those taking a placebo. The proportion for each group is
  • Fish oil group: 5%
  • Placebo group: 28%
The goal is to see if the seemingly lower psychotic rate in the fish oil group is statistically significant. The difficulty arises in deciding whether the observed difference is due to the treatment effect or merely a product of random variation. Statistical tests like the two-sample z-test are used to clarify this distinction under appropriate conditions. However, it is crucial to evaluate whether these conditions — such as normality and randomization — are met before proceeding with such tests.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "The Observed Effects of Teenage Passengers on the Risky Driving Behavior of Teenage Drivers" (Accident Analysis and Prevention [2005]: 973-982) investigated the driving behavior of teenagers by observing their vehicles as they left a high school parking lot and then again at a site approximately 12 mile from the school. Assume that it is reasonable to regard the teen drivers in this study as representative of the population of teen drivers. Use a .01 level of significance for any hypothesis tests. a. Data consistent with summary quantities appearing in the paper are given in the accompanying table. The measurements represent the difference between the observed vehicle speed and the posted speed limit (in miles per hour) for a sample of male teenage drivers and a sample of female teenage drivers. Do these data provide convincing support for the claim that, on average, male teenage drivers exceed the speed limit by more than do female teenage drivers?  Male Driver  Female Driver 1.30.21.30.50.91.12.10.70.71.11.31.230.11.30.90.60.52.10.5 b. Consider the average miles per hour over the speed limit for teenage drivers with passengers shown in the table at the top of the following page. For purposes of this exercise, suppose that each driver-passenger combination mean is based on a sample of size n=40 and that all sample standard deviations are equal to .8 .  Male Passenger  Female Passenger  Male Driver 5.2.3 Female Driver 2.3.6 i. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the average number of miles per hour over the speed limit is greater for male drivers with male passengers than it is for male drivers with female passengers? ii. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the average number of miles per hour over the speed limit is greater for female drivers with male passengers than it is for female drivers with female passengers? iii. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the average number of miles per hour over the speed limit is smaller for male drivers with female passengers than it is for female drivers with male passengers? c. Write a few sentences commenting on the effects of gender on teenagers driving with passengers.

The paper "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children in a National Household Survey" ( Pediatrics [2004]: 112 118 ) investigated the effect of fast-food consumption on other dietary variables. For a sample of 663 teens who reported that they did not eat fast food during a typical day, the mean daily calorie intake was 2258 and the sample standard deviation was 1519. For a sample of 413 teens who reported that they did eat fast food on a typical day, the mean calorie intake was 2637 and the standard deviation was 1138 . a. What assumptions about the two samples must be reasonable in order for the use of the two-sample t confidence interval to be appropriate? b. Use the given information to estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

Common Sense Media surveyed 1000 teens and 1000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show, Tell Too Much Online," San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen in a way that makes it reasonable to regard them as representative of American teens and parents of American teens. a. When asked if they check their online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checked his or her site more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. Use a significance level of .01 to carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks a social networking site more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who report that they check more than 10 times a day. b. The article also reported that 390 of the teens surveyed said they had posted something on their networking site that they later regretted. Would you use the two-sample z test of this section to test the hypothesis that more than one-third of all teens have posted something on a social networking site that they later regretted? Explain why or why not. c. Using an appropriate test procedure, carry out a test of the hypothesis given in Part (b). Use α=.05 for this test.

The director of the Kaiser Family Foundation's Program for the Study of Entertainment Media and Health said, "It's not just teenagers who are wired up and tuned in, its babies in diapers as well." A study by Kaiser Foundation provided one of the first looks at media use among the very youngest children those from 6 months to 6 years of age (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2003, www .kff.org). Because previous research indicated that children who have a TV in their bedroom spend less time reading than other children, the authors of the Foundation study were interested in learning about the proportion of kids who have a TV in their bedroom. They collected data from two independent random samples of parents. One sample consisted of parents of children age 6 months to 3 years old. The second sample consisted of parents of children age 3 to 6 years old. They found that the proportion of children who had a TV in their bedroom was . 30 for the sample of children age 6 months to 3 years and .43 for the sample of children age 3 to 6 years old. Suppose that the two sample sizes were each 100 . a. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of children age 6 months to 3 years who have a TV in their bedroom. Hint: This is a one-sample confidence interval. b. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of children age 3 to 6 years who have a TV in their bedroom. c. Do the confidence intervals from Parts (a) and (b) overlap? What does this suggest about the two population proportions? d. Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion that have TVs in the bedroom for children age 6 months to 3 years and for children age 3 to 6 years. e. Is the interval in Part (d) consistent with your answer in Part (c)? Explain.

The following quote is from the article "Canadians Are Healthier Than We Are" (Associated Press, May 31,2006 ): "The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those differences were too small to be statistically significant." This statement was based on the responses of a sample of 5183 Americans and a sample of 3505 Canadians. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression was given as .082 . a. Assuming that the researchers used a one-sided test with a significance level of .05, could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .09? Explain why or why not. b. Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of .05, could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .10? Explain why or why not.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free