Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety issued a press release titled "Teen Drivers Often Ignoring Bans on Using Cell Phones" (June 9,2008 ). The following quote is from the press release: Just \(1-2\) months prior to the ban's Dec. 1,2006 start, 11 percent of teen drivers were observed using cell phones as they left school in the afternoon. About 5 months after the ban took effect, \(12 \%\) of teen drivers were observed using cell phones. Suppose that the two samples of teen drivers (before the ban, after the ban) can be regarded as representative of these populations of teen drivers. Suppose also that 200 teen drivers were observed before the ban (so \(n_{1}=200\) and \(\hat{p}_{1}=.11\) ) and 150 teen drivers were observed after the ban. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportion using a cell phone while driving before the ban and the proportion after the ban. b. Is zero included in the confidence interval of Part (c)? What does this imply about the difference in the population proportions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportion is calculated above. b. The decision of whether zero is included in the interval or not is concluded in the steps. The implication of whether zero is or is not included in the interval is explained above.

Step by step solution

01

Define the sample proportions and calculate the standard error

Given that before the ban, \(n_{1}=200\) and \(\hat{p}_{1}=.11\). Let's assume \(\hat{p}_{2} = 0.12\), and \(n_{2}=150\) which are observed after the ban. Now, calculate the pooled sample proportion \(\hat{p} = \frac{n_{1} \cdot \hat{p}_{1} + n_{2} \cdot \hat{p}_{2}}{n_{1} + n_{2}}\). The standard error for the difference is given by \(\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}\).
02

Calculate the 95% confidence interval

The 95% confidence interval for the difference between two proportions is given by \((\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}) \pm Z \cdot SE\). Z value for a 95% confidence interval is 1.96. Substituting the values, get the lower and upper limit of the interval.
03

Examine if zero lies in the interval

Check whether zero lies in between the lower and upper limits of the confidence interval.
04

Interpret the result

If zero falls within the range, it suggests that there is no significant difference in the proportions of teens using cell phones before and after the ban. If not, it would imply a significant difference between these proportions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion
Proportion is a fundamental concept in statistics that refers to the part of a whole in relation to the total. It is often represented as a percentage or a fraction. In the context of the exercise, proportion is used to express the fraction of teen drivers using cell phones at two different time periods: before and after the implementation of a ban.
  • Before the ban, the proportion of teen drivers observed using cell phones was represented as \(\hat{p}_1 = 0.11\).
  • After the ban, it increased slightly to \(\hat{p}_2 = 0.12\).
A proportion gives insight into the prevalence or the commonality of an event within a certain population.
If an action plan or a policy is put in place, like the ban, evaluating changes in proportion can indicate the impact of the policy. Identifying and comparing these figures help researchers and policymakers make informed decisions on the effectiveness of regulations.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) is a crucial concept when dealing with confidence intervals and inferential statistics. It measures how much sample proportions are expected to fluctuate from the true population proportion if you were to take multiple samples.
In this exercise, the standard error helps us determine the reliability of our estimate of the difference in proportions before and after the cell phone ban.
  • The formula for the SE when comparing two proportions is:\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})\left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} \]
  • Pooled sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) is a combined proportion of both groups before and after the ban.
A smaller standard error indicates that our estimate is more precise. It is essential for calculating the range within which we believe the true difference in proportions lies. This forms the basis of constructing a confidence interval.
Z Value
The Z value is a statistical figure used to assess how far a sample mean or proportion is from the population mean or proportion, expressed in terms of standard errors.
In the context of constructing a confidence interval for the difference between two proportions, the Z value represents the number of standard errors to add or subtract to create a confidence interval.
  • For a 95% confidence interval, the Z value is 1.96.
  • This value is derived from the standard normal distribution.
To utilize the Z value in our calculation:
  • The Z value multiplies the standard error, essentially widening the interval, which accounts for the uncertainty in our samples.
  • The formula: \((\hat{p}_1-\hat{p}_2) \pm Z \cdot SE\) directs us in constructing the interval.
Understanding and applying the Z value accurately ensures that our confidence interval effectively captures the possible true difference in population proportions with a specified level of confidence.
Population Comparison
Population comparison involves analyzing two or more groups to see how they differ from each other. In this exercise, the comparison is between the proportion of teen drivers using cell phones before and after a legislative ban.
By examining these two groups:
  • We can gauge whether the ban had a substantial impact on behavior.
  • The calculations give insight into whether any change in behavior is statistically significant.
In this exercise, after calculating the confidence interval:
  • A finding where zero is included in this interval suggests no significant difference in proportions between the two populations.
  • Conversely, if zero is not included, it implies a significant difference, indicating that the ban may have had a real effect.
This type of comparison helps in decision-making processes and evaluating the effectiveness of societal measures like policy changes or new regulations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider two populations for which \(\mu_{1}=30\), \(\sigma_{1}=2, \mu_{2}=25,\) and \(\sigma_{2}=3 .\) Suppose that two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=40\) and \(n_{2}=50\) are selected. Describe the approximate sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) (center, spread, and shape).

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: 1322- 1326) gave the accompanying data on total body bone mineral content (g) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning is greater than that during breast feeding by more than 25 g? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05 \(\begin{array}{lcccccc}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\\ \mathrm{~B} & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \mathrm{P} & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\\ \mathrm{~B} & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \mathrm{P} & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

In the experiment described in the paper "Exposure to Diesel Exhaust Induces Changes in EEG in Human Volunteers" (Particle and Fibre Toxicology [2007])\(, 10\) healthy men were exposed to diesel exhaust for 1 hour. A measure of brain activity (called median power frequency, or MPF) was recorded at two different locations in the brain both before and after the diesel exhaust exposure. The resulting data are given in the accompanying table. For purposes of this example, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of 10 men as representative of healthy adult males. $$ \begin{array}{ccrcr} \hline & \text { Location 1 } & \text { Location 1 } & \text { Location 2 } & \text { Location 2 } \\ \text { Subject } & \text { Before } & \text { After } & \text { Before } & \text { After } \\ \hline 1 & 6.4 & 8.0 & 6.9 & 9.4 \\ 2 & 8.7 & 12.6 & 9.5 & 11.2 \\ 3 & 7.4 & 8.4 & 6.7 & 10.2 \\ 4 & 8.7 & 9.0 & 9.0 & 9.6 \\ 5 & 9.8 & 8.4 & 9.7 & 9.2 \\ 6 & 8.9 & 11.0 & 9.0 & 11.9 \\ 7 & 9.3 & 14.4 & 7.9 & 9.1 \\ 8 & 7.4 & 11.3 & 8.3 & 9.3 \\ 9 & 6.6 & 7.1 & 7.2 & 8.0 \\ 10 & 8.9 & 11.2 & 7.4 & 9.1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean MPF at brain location 1 is higher after diesel exposure? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.05 .\) b. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate for the difference in mean MPF at brain location 2 before and after exposure to diesel exhaust.

An individual can take either a scenic route to work or a nonscenic route. She decides that use of the nonscenic route can be justified only if it reduces the mean travel time by more than 10 minutes. a. If \(\mu_{1}\) is the mean for the scenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) for the nonscenic route, what hypotheses should be tested? b. If \(\mu_{1}\) is the mean for the nonscenic route and \(\mu_{2}\) for the scenic route, what hypotheses should be tested?

The following quote is from the article "Canadians Are Healthier Than We Are" (Associated Press, May 31,2006 ): "The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those differences were too small to be statistically significant." This statement was based on the responses of a sample of 5183 Americans and a sample of 3505 Canadians. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression was given as .082 . a. Assuming that the researchers used a one-sided test with a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .09? Explain why or why not. b. Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .10? Explain why or why not.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free