Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A hotel chain is interested in evaluating reservation processes. Guests can reserve a room by using either a telephone system or an online system that is accessed through the hotel's web site. Independent random samples of 80 guests who reserved a room by phone and 60 guests who reserved a room online were selected. Of those who reserved by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the reservation process. Of those who reserved online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is higher for those who reserve a room online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
To decide whether or not it is reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is higher for those who reserve a room online, compare the p-value to the significance level. If the p-value < α, the evidence supports the claim that the proportion of customers who are satisfied is higher for online reservations.

Step by step solution

01

Identify a sample proportion for each group

The sample proportion \(p_1\) for phone reservations is 57 out of 80, which equals 0.7125. The sample proportion \(p_2\) for online reservations is 50 out of 60, which equals 0.8333.
02

Formulate the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0: p_1 = p_2\), implies that the proportion of guests satisfied with the reservation system is the same for both phone and online systems. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a: p_1 < p_2\), implies that the proportion of guests satisfied with the online reservation system is greater than that of the phone reservation system.
03

Compute the pooled sample proportion and Standard Error

The pooled sample proportion \( \hat{p}\) is calculated by adding the number of 'successes' (satisfied customers) in both groups and dividing by the total number of observations in both groups. The standard error (SE) of the difference in sample proportions is calculated using the formula \(SE = \sqrt{ \hat{p} ( 1 - \hat{p} ) (1/n_1 + 1/n_2)}\), where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes for each group.
04

Calculate the z-score

The z-score is calculated by subtracting the null hypothesis value (which is 0 in this case as \(H_0\) states that the population proportions are equal) from the difference in sample proportions, and then dividing that difference by the standard error.
05

Find the p-value

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a z-score equal to or more extreme than the observed z-score, assuming the null hypothesis is true. The p-value is found using a standard normal z distribution table.
06

Make a decision

If the p-value is less than the significance level (α=0.05), reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion
A sample proportion is a statistic that gives us an estimate of a population parameter. It is calculated by dividing the number of successful outcomes by the total number in the sample. For example, in the hotel reservation study, sample proportion helps us understand the percentage of satisfied customers.
  • For phone reservations: Out of 80 guests, 57 were satisfied. So, the sample proportion is calculated as: \[ p_1 = \frac{57}{80} = 0.7125 \]
  • For online reservations: Out of 60 guests, 50 were satisfied. So, the sample proportion is:\[ p_2 = \frac{50}{60} = 0.8333 \]
These proportions give us a sense of how many people on average are satisfied with each reservation method.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In hypothesis testing, we start by stating two opposing statements: the null hypothesis (denoted as \(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (denoted as \(H_a\)). This initial step frames our investigation and helps us understand what we are testing.For the reservation process:
  • Null Hypothesis \(H_0: p_1 = p_2\): This proposes that there is no difference in satisfaction between phone and online reservations.
  • Alternative Hypothesis \(H_a: p_1 < p_2\): Suggests that a higher proportion are satisfied with online reservations compared to phone reservations.
These hypotheses allow us to test if the observed differences in sample proportions are statistically significant.
Pooled Sample Proportion
The pooled sample proportion combines data from both groups to provide an overall estimate of success across the samples. Calculating the pooled sample proportion is useful when testing for differences between two proportions.In our hotel reservations case:We calculate the pooled sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) by taking the total number of satisfied customers from both groups and dividing it by the total number of observations from both groups.\[ \hat{p} = \frac{57 + 50}{80 + 60} = \frac{107}{140} = 0.7643 \]This combined proportion helps standardize our results and is used to calculate the standard error needed to test our hypotheses.
p-value
The p-value plays a crucial role in deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as or more extreme than the one observed under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.In this study:
  • We compute the test statistic, usually a z-score, based on our sample data.
  • The p-value is found using the standard normal distribution, showing the likelihood of the observed difference if \(H_0\) is true.
If the p-value is less than our significance level (in this case, \(\alpha = 0.05\)), then we reject the null hypothesis. This tells us that there is statistically significant evidence to suggest a difference in satisfaction between phone and online reservations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA Today, February 2, \(2 \mathrm{O} 1 \mathrm{O}\) ) describes a study in which 81 patients age 13 to 25 who were considered atrisk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. The other group took a placebo. After 1 year, \(5 \%\) of those in the fish oil group and \(28 \%\) of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the two-sample \(z\) test of this section to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

The paper "If It's Hard to Read, It's Hard to Do" (Psychological Science [2008]\(: 986-988)\) described an interesting study of how people perceive the effort required to do certain tasks. Each of 20 students was randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group was given instructions for an exercise routine that were printed in an easy-to-read font (Arial). The other group received the same set of instructions, but printed in a font that is considered difficult to read (Brush). After reading the instructions, subjects estimated the time (in minutes) they thought it would take to complete the exercise routine. Summary statistics are given below. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} & \text { Easy font } & \text { Difficult font } \\ \hline n & 10 & 10 \\ \bar{x} & 8.23 & 15.10 \\ s & 5.61 & 9.28 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The authors of the paper used these data to carry out a two-sample \(t\) test, and concluded that at the .10 significance level, there was convincing evidence that the mean estimated time to complete the exercise routine was less when the instructions were printed in an easy-to-read font than when printed in a difficult-to-read font. Discuss the appropriateness of using a two-sample \(t\) test in this situation.

Acrylic bone cement is commonly used in total joint replacement to secure the artificial joint. Data on the force (measured in Newtons, \(N\) ) required to break a cement bond under two different temperature conditions and in two different mediums appear in the accompanying table. (These data are consistent with summary quantities appearing in the paper "Validation of the Small-Punch Test as a Technique for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement" (Journal of Engineering in Medicine [2006]: 11-21).) $$ \begin{array}{lcl} \text { Temperature } & \text { Medium } & \text { Data on Breaking Force } \\\ \hline \text { 22 degrees } & \text { Dry } & 100.8,141.9,194.8,118.4, \\ & & 176.1,213.1 \\ \text { 37 degrees } & \text { Dry } & 302.1,339.2,288.8,306.8, \\ & & 305.2,327.5 \\ \text { 22 degrees } & \text { Wet } & 385.3,368.3,322.6,307.4, \\ & & 357.9,321.4 \\ \text { 37 degrees } & \text { Wet } & 363.5,377.7,327.7,331.9, \\ & & 338.1,394.6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Estimate the difference between the mean breaking force in a dry medium at 37 degrees and the mean breaking force at the same temperature in a wet medium using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. b. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean breaking force in a dry medium at the higher temperature is greater than the mean breaking force at the lower temperature by more than \(100 N ?\) Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .10 .

Consider two populations for which \(\mu_{1}=30\), \(\sigma_{1}=2, \mu_{2}=25,\) and \(\sigma_{2}=3 .\) Suppose that two independent random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=40\) and \(n_{2}=50\) are selected. Describe the approximate sampling distribution of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) (center, spread, and shape).

Some commercial airplanes recirculate approximately \(50 \%\) of the cabin air in order to increase fuel efficiency. The authors of the paper "Aircraft Cabin Air Recirculation and Symptoms of the Common Cold" (Journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: \(483-486\) ) studied 1100 airline passengers who flew from San Francisco to Denver between January and April 1999\. Some passengers traveled on airplanes that recirculated air and others traveled on planes that did not recirculate air. Of the 517 passengers who flew on planes that did not recirculate air, 108 reported post-flight respiratory symptoms, while 111 of the 583 passengers on planes that did recirculate air reported such symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of passengers with post-flight respiratory symptoms differs for planes that do and do not recirculate air? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\). You may assume that it is reasonable to regard these two samples as being independently selected and as representative of the two populations of interest.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free