Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: 55-76) gives information from a survey of children in grades \(4,5,\) and \(6 .\) The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was -.83 (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) The data are paired because each data point consists of two measurements from the same individual. b) The 95% confidence interval for the mean difference is approximately \(-0.99, -0.67\) meaning that we are 95% confident that the true mean difference lies within this interval.

Step by step solution

01

Explaining why the data are paired

The data are paired as they come from the same individual. Each girl indicated both the number of science courses she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. Hence, there are two measures for each girl which are naturally paired.
02

Constructing the confidence interval

Firstly, recall that the confidence interval formula is given by \(\bar{x} \pm z \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\) where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(z\) is the Z-value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level, \(s\) is the standard deviation and \(n\) is the sample size. Given mean \(\bar{x} = -0.83\), standard deviation \(s = 1.51\) and \(n = 224\), and \(z = 1.96\) for a 95% confidence interval. Substituting the values, the confidence interval calculation will be: \(-0.83 \pm 1.96 \times \frac{1.51}{\sqrt{224}}\).
03

Calculating and interpreting the confidence interval

After plugging in the numbers and performing the calculation, you will get a confidence interval of around \(-0.99, -0.67\). This means that we're 95% confident that the true mean difference between the number of science courses each girl intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take lies between -0.99 and -0.67. It confirms that on average, girls think they should take fewer science courses than boys. We can use this confidence interval as an estimate of the population mean difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Science Course Enrollment Intentions
Understanding the intentions behind science course enrollment can provide valuable insights into the educational aspirations and perceptions among different student demographics. In the study referenced, a survey specifically targeted girls in grades 4 to 6 to determine any gender-based discrepancies in their science education plans. What became clear is that these intentions are shaped by a range of factors, such as societal expectations, personal interests, and perceived capabilities.

By shedding light on these intentions, educators can better tailor their approach to encourage greater inclusivity and interest in science education. It's crucial to support all students in recognizing the importance and accessibility of science, regardless of gender, and to inspire them to envision themselves in scientific roles in the future.
Paired Data Analysis
When dealing with paired data, the analysis revolves around two interrelated measurements taken from the same subject. In this scenario, each girl provided two types of information: the number of science courses she plans on taking, and the number she believes boys of their age should enroll in.

The pairing is intrinsic because the two measures come from identical respondents, making it reasonable to evaluate the differences within each pair. This analysis can reveal patterns or disparities in perceptions, such as gender-based expectations in educational intentions. Proper statistical methods must be used to handle such paired data to accurately draw conclusions about the studied group.
Confidence Interval Construction
Constructing a confidence interval is a statistical tool that allows us to estimate the range within which the true mean of a population is likely to fall, based on sample data. The formula used to calculate this interval involves the sample mean, the standard deviation, the Z-value associated with the desired confidence level, and the number of observations in the sample.

In constructing the confidence interval for the mean difference in the study, we start by identifying these components and applying them to the standard formula. The resulting interval gives us an understanding of where the actual mean likely sits within a defined level of confidence, in this case, 95%. It's a vital step for interpreting the data as it quantifies the certainty (or uncertainty) of our estimations.
Statistical Interpretation
Interpreting statistical outcomes, such as the confidence interval in this study, requires a careful consideration of what the numbers really imply about our population of interest. The confidence interval calculated suggests that there's a 95% likelihood that the true average difference in science courses girls intend to take versus what they think boys should take is between -0.99 and -0.67.

This tells us there's a statistically significant difference in enrollment intentions that favors boys. We interpret this as an indicator of a social or perceptual bias that could be influencing girls' decisions on science education. Understanding this interpretation enables educators and policymakers to make informed decisions aimed at addressing such disparities in educational settings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: 1322- 1326) gave the accompanying data on total body bone mineral content (g) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning is greater than that during breast feeding by more than 25 g? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05 \(\begin{array}{lcccccc}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\\ \mathrm{~B} & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \mathrm{P} & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\\ \mathrm{~B} & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \mathrm{P} & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

Two proposed computer mouse designs were compared by recording wrist extension in degrees for 24 people who each used both mouse types ("Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs," Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992). The difference in wrist extension was computed by subtracting extension for mouse type \(\mathrm{B}\) from the wrist extension for mouse type A for each student. The mean difference was reported to be 8.82 degrees. Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 24 people as representative of the population of computer users. a. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 10 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(A\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. b. Suppose that the standard deviation of the differences was 26 degrees. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wrist extension for mouse type \(A\) is greater than for mouse type B? Use a .05 significance level. c. Briefly explain why a different conclusion was reached in the hypothesis tests of Parts (a) and (b).

Suppose that you were interested in investigating the effect of a drug that is to be used in the treatment of patients who have glaucoma in both eyes. A comparison between the mean reduction in eye pressure for this drug and for a standard treatment is desired. Both treatments are applied directly to the eye. a. Describe how you would go about collecting data for your investigation. b. Does your method result in paired data? c. Can you think of a reasonable method of collecting data that would not result in paired samples? Would such an experiment be as informative as a paired experiment? Comment.

Two different underground pipe coatings for preventing corrosion are to be compared. The effect of a coating (as measured by maximum depth of corrosion penetration on a piece of pipe) may vary with depth, orientation, soil type, pipe composition, etc. Describe how an experiment that filters out the effects of these extraneous factors could be carried out.

The press release titled "Keeping Score When It counts: Graduation Rates and Academic Progress Rates" (The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport, March 16,2009 ) gave the 2009 graduation rates for African-American basketball players and for white basketball players at every NCAA Division I university with a basketball program. Explain why it is not necessary to use a paired \(t\) test to determine if the mean graduation rate for African-American basketball players differs from the mean graduation rate for white basketball players for Division I schools.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free