Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A researcher at the Medical College of Virginia conducted a study of 60 randomly selected male soccer players and concluded that frequently "heading" the ball in soccer lowers players' IQs (USA Today, August 14 1995). The soccer players were divided into two groups, based on whether they averaged 10 or more headers per game. Mean IQs were reported in the article, but the sample sizes and standard deviations were not given. Suppose that these values were as given in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{l|ccc} & & \text { Sample } & \text { Sample } \\ & n & \text { Mean } & \text { sd } \\ \hline \text { Fewer Than 1O Headers } & 35 & 112 & 10 \\ 10 \text { or More Headers } & 25 & 103 & 8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Do these data support the researcher's conclusion? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05 .\) Can you conclude that heading the ball causes lower \(\mathrm{IQ}\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer to the question will be determined on the basis of the p-value compared with the significance level. If the p-value is less than the significance level, the data does support the researcher's conclusion that frequently 'heading' the ball in soccer lowers players' IQs. However, it is important to remember that this test only provides evidence, it does not definitively prove that heading the ball causes a lower IQ.

Step by step solution

01

Set up hypotheses

The first step is to set up the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) will state no difference in means, and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_A\)) will state that there is a difference. In this case, the null hypothesis is: \(\mu_1 = \mu_2\), where \(\mu_1\) is the population mean IQ for the group with fewer than 10 headers and \(\mu_2\) is the population mean IQ for the group with 10 or more headers. The alternative hypothesis will be: \(\mu_1 \neq \mu_2\).
02

Calculate the test statistic

Next, the test statistic must be calculated, which will follow a Student's t-distribution. The formula for the test statistic in this case is: \[ t = \frac{{(\bar{X}_1 - \bar{X}_2)}}{{\sqrt{\frac{{s_1^2}}{n_1} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n_2}}}} \] Where \(\bar{X}_1\) and \(\bar{X}_2\) are the sample means, \(s_1^2\) and \(s_2^2\) are the sample variances, and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes for the two groups. Substituting the given values from the table above, you will find the test statistic.
03

Find the p-value

After finding the test statistic, the next step is to find the p-value. This can be done using statistical software or a t-distribution table. The value corresponds to the probability of finding the observed, or more extreme, results when the null hypothesis of a study question is true.
04

Make a Conclusion

If the p-value is less than the significance level, \(\alpha=0.05\), reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. This means there is evidence to suggest that there's a difference in means. In terms of this question, it means it might support the researcher's conclusion that heading the ball affects players' IQs. However, even if there is evidence to support the conclusion, it does not prove causation. Other factors might affect the players' IQs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

T-Test for Independent Means
When comparing the average scores or measurements of two different groups, researchers often use a statistical method known as the t-test for independent means. This method helps to determine if the differences in group means are statistically significant or if they could have occurred by chance. The t-test assumes that the two groups are independent of each other with different members in each group. The situation with the soccer players and their IQ scores is a suitable scenario for this test since we have two distinct groups – those who head the ball frequently and those who don't.

In the provided exercise, the calculation of the t-statistic is a critical step. It takes into account the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes from both groups. The resulting statistic is then used to gauge the likelihood of the null hypothesis – which states there is no effect or difference – being true. If the calculated t is sufficiently large, it may lead us to doubt the null hypothesis and consider the alternative that there indeed is a significant difference between the groups' mean IQ scores.
P-Value Interpretation
After calculating the t-statistic, obtaining the p-value is the next logical step. The p-value is a probability score that tells us how likely it is to get a result as extreme as, or more extreme than, what we've observed in our study if the null hypothesis were true. A low p-value (typically less than 0.05) suggests that the observed data is quite unlikely under the null hypothesis, and thus, we may reject the null hypothesis.

In the context of this exercise, if we found a p-value that is less than the alpha level of 0.05, it would mean there is less than a 5% chance that the difference in IQ scores between the two groups of soccer players occurred due to random variation alone. Therefore, we would reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in mean IQs. However, interpreting the p-value should be done with care; a small p-value does not prove that one variable causes the difference in the other. It simply highlights a statistical association that warrants further investigation.
Causation vs Correlation
Determining causation is a complex matter in scientific research. A key distinction to make is that between correlation and causation. Correlation refers to a relationship where two variables move together, but it does not mean one causes the other to happen. Causation, on the other hand, implies that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; there is a cause and effect relationship.

In our example of soccer players and IQ scores, even if we find a statistically significant difference in IQ based on the frequency of heading the ball, we cannot immediately conclude that heading the ball causes a decrease in IQ. There could be other variables at play, such as the overall physical activity levels, dietary habits, education, or even socioeconomic status that might influence both soccer playing and IQ. To establish causation, further studies, possibly with experimental and longitudinal designs, are required to rule out alternative explanations and to track the relationship over time.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following quote is from the article "Canadians Are Healthier Than We Are" (Associated Press, May 31,2006 ): "The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those differences were too small to be statistically significant." This statement was based on the responses of a sample of 5183 Americans and a sample of 3505 Canadians. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression was given as .082 . a. Assuming that the researchers used a one-sided test with a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .09? Explain why or why not. b. Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .10? Explain why or why not.

The article "Spray Flu Vaccine May Work Better Than Injections for Tots" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, May 2,2006 ) described a study that compared flu vaccine administered by injection and flu vaccine administered as a nasal spray. Each of the 8000 children under the age of 5 who participated in the study received both a nasal spray and an injection, but only one was the real vaccine and the other was salt water. At the end of the flu season, it was determined that \(3.9 \%\) of the 4000 children receiving the real vaccine by nasal spray got sick with the flu and \(8.6 \%\) of the 4000 receiving the real vaccine by injection got sick with the flu. a. Why would the researchers give every child both a nasal spray and an injection? b. Use the given data to estimate the difference in the proportion of children who get sick with the flu after being vaccinated with an injection and the proportion of children who get sick with the flu after being vaccinated with the nasal spray using a \(99 \%\) confidence interval. Based on the confidence interval, would you conclude that the proportion of children who get the flu is different for the two vaccination methods?

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in \(2005,\) only \(15 \%\) reported owning an \(\mathrm{MP} 3\) player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size \(1112 .\) Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

Do certain behaviors result in a severe drain on energy resources because a great deal of energy is expended in comparison to energy intake? The article "The Energetic Cost of Courtship and Aggression in a Plethodontid Salamander" (Ecology [1983]: 979-983) reported on one of the few studies concerned with behavior and energy expenditure. The accompanying table gives oxygen consumption \((\mathrm{mL} / \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{hr})\) for male-female salamander pairs. (The determination of consumption values is rather complicated. It is partly for this reason that so few studies of this type have been carried out.) $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \text { Behavior } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Size } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Mean } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { sd } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Noncourting } & 11 & .072 & .0066 \\ \text { Courting } & 15 & .099 & .0071 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. The pooled \(t\) test is a test procedure for testing \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=\) hypothesized value when it is reasonable to assume that the two population distributions are normal with equal standard deviations \(\left(\sigma_{1}=\right.\) \(\sigma_{2}\) ). The test statistic for the pooled \(t\) test is obtained by replacing both \(s_{1}\) and \(s_{2}\) in the two-sample \(t\) test statistic with \(s_{p}\) where \(s_{p}=\sqrt{\frac{\left(n_{1}-1\right) s_{1}^{2}+\left(n_{2}-1\right) s_{2}^{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}-2}}\) When the population distributions are normal with equal standard deviations and \(H_{0}\) is true, the resulting pooled \(t\) statistic has a \(t\) distribution with \(\mathrm{df}=n_{1}+\) \(n_{2}-2 .\) For the reported data, the two sample standard deviations are similar. Use the pooled \(t\) test with \(\alpha=.05\) to determine whether the mean oxygen consumption for courting pairs is higher than the mean oxygen consumption for noncourting pairs. b. Would the conclusion in Part (a) have been different if the two-sample \(t\) test had been used rather than the pooled \(t\) test?

The article "Plugged In, but Tuned Out" (USA Today, January 20,2010 ) summarizes data from two surveys of kids age 8 to 18 . One survey was conducted in 1999 and the other was conducted in \(2009 .\) Data on number of hours per day spent using electronic media that are consistent with summary quantities given in the article are given below (the actual sample sizes for the two surveys were much larger). For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the two samples as representative of kids age 8 to 18 in each of the 2 years that the surveys were conducted. $$ \begin{array}{l|lllllllllllllll} \hline 2009 & 5 & 9 & 5 & 8 & 7 & 6 & 7 & 9 & 7 & 9 & 6 & 9 & 10 & 9 & 8 \\ 1999 & 4 & 5 & 7 & 7 & 5 & 7 & 5 & 6 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 5 & 6 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Because the given sample sizes are small, in order for the two-sample \(t\) test to be appropriate, what assumption must be made about the distribution of electronic media use times? Use the given data to construct graphical displays that would be useful in determining whether this assumption is reasonable. Do you think it is reasonable to use these data to carry out a two-sample \(t\) test? b. Do the given data provide convincing evidence that the mean number of hours per day spent using electronic media was greater in 2009 than in 1999 ? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .01 c. Construct and interpret a \(98 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference between the mean number of hours per day spent using electronic media in 2009 and 1999 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free