Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The power of a test is influenced by the sample size and the choice of significance level. a. Explain how increasing the sample size affects the power (when significance level is held fixed). b. Explain how increasing the significance level affects the power (when sample size is held fixed).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Increasing both the sample size and the significance level (while holding the other constant) increases the power of a statistical test. More extensive samples provide more information, reducing the standard error and increasing power. A higher significance level implies higher tolerance for Type I errors, making the test more likely to reject false null hypotheses, thereby improving power.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation of power

When discussing power, it's vital to note that it is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis. In testing a hypothesis, Type I and Type II errors may occur. We increase the power of a test to reduce the probability of a Type II error occurring - that is, failing to reject a false null hypothesis.
02

Effect of increasing the sample size

If the sample size increases while the significance level is held fixed, the power of the test also increases. A larger sample size gives more information about the population being studied, reducing the standard error and making a statistical test more likely to reject a false null hypothesis. Thus, upsurging the power of the test.
03

Understanding significance level

The significance level, often denoted by alpha, is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true. Typically, this value is set at 0.05, indicating a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference.
04

Effect of increasing the significance level

If the significance level increases while the sample size is held constant, the power of the test also improves. Increasing the significance level means we are willing to accept a higher risk of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis (Type I error). This willingness to accept a higher Type I error rate makes the test more likely to reject the null hypothesis when it's false, enhancing the power of the test.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Size and Statistical Power
Understanding the relationship between sample size and statistical power is crucial in hypothesis testing. With a greater sample size, you gather more information about the population, which reduces the standard error of the estimate. Reduced standard error enables you to detect even small effects in the data, making the test more sensitive to differences that might exist. Consequently, an increase in sample size typically leads to greater statistical power, meaning that the probability of detecting a true effect if one exists is heightened.

Take, for example, a study assessing the effectiveness of a new medication. Using a small sample size might not showcase the drug's effects accurately due to high variability or random chance. However, as the number of participants grows, the results tend to stabilize, and any genuine effects become clearer against the backdrop of random variation. This mathematical principle is the fundamental reason why large-scale studies generally provide more reliable evidence, as they are less susceptible to random errors and more likely to detect actual differences when they exist.
Significance Level in Hypothesis Testing
The significance level, conventionally denoted by the Greek letter alpha (α), sets the threshold at which we deem results to be statistically significant. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true – a scenario known as a Type I error. A commonly chosen alpha value is 0.05, implying that there's a 5% chance of committing a Type I error.

In practice, increasing the significance level means you are more willing to risk mistakenly rejecting the null hypothesis, because doing so also increases your chances of detecting an actual effect if there is one - which in turn improves the statistical power of your test. It's similar to turning up the sensitivity on a metal detector: the risk of false alarms goes up, but you're less likely to walk past a buried treasure without a signal. This analogy illustrates the trade-off between increasing our power and the risk of making an error in our hypothesis testing.
Type II Error and Its Impact on Research
In the context of hypothesis testing, a Type II error, or a 'false negative', occurs when a researcher fails to reject a false null hypothesis. This is the error of not detecting an effect when there actually is one. The probability of making a Type II error is denoted by beta (β), and the power of a test (1 - β) reflects the ability to minimize this error.

One crucial factor influencing the rate of Type II errors is the effect size, which reflects the magnitude of the difference or relationship being examined in the study. Smaller effect sizes are generally harder to detect and require larger samples to achieve the same power as studies with larger effect sizes. Therefore, researchers must balance their sample sizes, significance levels, and expected effect sizes to optimize the power and minimize the probability of making Type II errors, thereby improving the reliability of their findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do state laws that allow private citizens to carry concealed weapons result in a reduced crime rate? The author of a study carried out by the Brookings Institution is reported as saying, "The strongest thing I could say is that I don't see any strong evidence that they are reducing crime" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 23 . 2003 ). a. Is this conclusion consistent with testing \(H_{0}:\) concealed weapons laws reduce crime versus \(H_{a}:\) concealed weapons laws do not reduce crime or with testing \(H_{0}:\) concealed weapons laws do not reduce crime versus \(H_{a}\) : concealed weapons laws reduce crime Explain. b. Does the stated conclusion indicate that the null hypothesis was rejected or not rejected? Explain.

Use the definition of the \(P\) -value to explain the following: a. Why \(H_{0}\) would be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=.0003\) b. Why \(H_{0}\) would not be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=.350\)

A television manufacturer claims that (at least) \(90 \%\) of its TV sets will need no service during the first 3 years of operation. A consumer agency wishes to check this claim, so it obtains a random sample of \(n=100\) purchasers and asks each whether the set purchased needed repair during the first 3 years after purchase. Let \(\hat{p}\) be the sample proportion of responses indicating no repair (so that no repair is identified with a success). Let \(p\) denote the actual proportion of successes for all sets made by this manufacturer. The agency does not want to claim false advertising unless sample evidence strongly suggests that \(p<.9 .\) The appropriate hypotheses are then \(H_{0}: p=.9\) versus \(H_{a}: p<.9\). a. In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors, and discuss the possible consequences of each. b. Would you recommend a test procedure that uses \(\alpha=.10\) or one that uses \(\alpha=.01 ?\) Explain.

In a survey of 1005 adult Americans, \(46 \%\) indicated that they were somewhat interested or very interested in having web access in their cars (USA Today, May I. 2009 ). Suppose that the marketing manager of a car manufacturer claims that the \(46 \%\) is based only on a sample and that \(46 \%\) is close to half, so there is no reason to believe that the proportion of all adult Americans who want car web access is less than \(.50 .\) Is the marketing manager correct in his claim? Provide statistical evidence to support your answer. For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be considered as representative of adult Americans.

Many older homes have electrical systems that use fuses rather than circuit breakers. A manufacturer of 40 -amp fuses wants to make sure that the mean amperage at which its fuses burn out is in fact \(40 .\) If the mean amperage is lower than \(40,\) customers will complain because the fuses require replacement too often. If the mean amperage is higher than \(40,\) the manufacturer might be liable for damage to an electrical system as a result of fuse malfunction. To verify the mean amperage of the fuses, a sample of fuses is selected and tested. If a hypothesis test is performed using the resulting data, what null and alternative hypotheses would be of interest to the manufacturer?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free