Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Much concern has been expressed regarding the practice of using nitrates as meat preservatives. In one study involving possible effects of these chemicals, bacteria cultures were grown in a medium containing nitrates. The rate of uptake of radio-labeled amino acid (in dpm, disintegrations per minute) was then determined for each culture, yielding the following observations: \(\begin{array}{llllllll}7251 & 6871 & 9632 & 6866 & 9094 & 5849 & 8957 & 7978 \\\ 7064 & 7494 & 7883 & 8178 & 7523 & 8724 & 7468 & \end{array}\) Suppose that it is known that the mean rate of uptake for cultures without nitrates is 8000 . Do the data suggest that the addition of nitrates results in a decrease in the mean rate of uptake? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .10 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
To check whether the addition of nitrates decreases the mean rate of uptake, we conduct a one-sample t-test. After calculating the sample mean, standard deviation, the t-value and looking up the critical value for the chosen significance level, we compare these two values. If the t-value is greater than the critical t-value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the addition of nitrates decreases the mean rate of uptake.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate Hypotheses

Set up the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (HA): \nH0: μ ≥ 8000 \nHA: μ < 8000 \nwhere μ is the population mean rate of uptake with nitrates.
02

Calculate Sample Statistics

Count the number of observations (n), calculate the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)) and the sample standard deviation (s).
03

Calculate Test Statistic

Calculate the t-test statistic using the formula: \n\(t = \frac{\bar{x} - μ}{s / \sqrt{n}}\) \nWhere: \n\(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean \nμ is the population mean hypothesized under the null hypothesis \ns is the sample standard deviation \nn is the number of observations.
04

Find the Critical Value

Find the critical value for t from the t-distribution table given the significance level (0.10) and the degrees of freedom (n-1).
05

Make a Decision

Compare the t statistic with the critical value. If the absolute value of t is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean rate of uptake is less than 8000.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the T-Test
The t-test is a fundamental statistical analysis method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In the context of our exercise, we use a one-sample t-test. This helps us analyze whether the sample mean from a nitrate-treated group significantly differs from a known value, which in this case is the mean rate of uptake for cultures without nitrates.
A t-test accomplishes this by comparing the calculated t value from our sample with a critical value obtained from t-distribution tables. The outcome informs us whether the observed sample results are due to random variation or a significant effect, which might suggest that nitrates impact the bacteria culture's mean rate of uptake.
Performing a t-test involves several steps, including calculating the sample mean, standard deviation, and test statistic, which we will delve into in each subsequent section.
Exploring the Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, represented as \(H_0\), serves as the default or baseline assumption in hypothesis testing. In our exercise, the null hypothesis states that the mean rate of uptake with nitrates is at least 8000 disintegrations per minute (dpm).
  • Symbolically, this is shown as \(H_0: \mu \geq 8000\).
  • The null hypothesis represents the idea that any differences observed in the sample are due to random chance rather than a true effect.
The null hypothesis stands unless evidence suggests otherwise, which means that statistical tests need strong evidence to reject \(H_0\). This rigorous approach prevents false positives, maintaining the integrity of conclusions drawn from the data.
Alternative Hypothesis Explained
In contrast to the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis (\(H_A\)) represents the outcome of interest that researchers aim to support. In this exercise:
  • The alternative hypothesis proposes that the nitrates indeed cause a decrease, hence \(H_A: \mu < 8000\).
It's important to note that the decision to accept \(H_A\) suggests that external factors, like the nitrates, contribute to a lower mean rate of uptake than expected. The formulation of this hypothesis aligns with the study's objective—testing whether nitrate addition negatively affects bacterial uptake rate. With evidence favoring \(H_A\), scientists can conclude there is an actual decrease in uptake rates when nitrates are introduced.
Understanding Significance Level
A significance level, often denoted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold for determining when to reject the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of committing a Type I error—rejecting \(H_0\) when it's actually true.
  • In our study, we use a 0.10 significance level.
  • This means there's a 10% risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.
Choosing the right significance level is crucial: if it's too high, you risk false discoveries (Type I errors); too low, and you might miss real effects (Type II errors). In scientific studies, a common choice is \(\alpha = 0.05\), but in our case, testing with 0.10 makes evaluations more sensitive to detect possible changes in mean uptake due to nitrates.
Concept of Sample Mean
The sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)) is a key statistic that represents the average of all observations in a sample. It's a critical component in calculating the t-test statistic. The formula for the sample mean is: \[ \bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i \] where \(x_i\) represents each observation, and \(n\) is the total number of observations.
The sample mean provides an estimate of the population mean. In our nitrate study:
  • We calculate the sample mean from the recorded bacterial culture uptake rates.
  • This calculated mean is leveraged to compare against the known mean of 8000 dpm without nitrates.
Understanding the sample mean is essential as it underpins the t-test, helping determine whether the observed data suggest a statistically significant effect of the nitrates on bacterial cultures.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2 -year study to determine whether cancer death rates for areas near nuclear power plants are higher than for areas without nuclear facilities (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 17,1990 ). A spokesperson for the Cancer Institute said, "From the data at hand, there was no convincing evidence of any increased risk of death from any of the cancers surveyed due to living near nuclear facilities. However, no study can prove the absence of an effect." a. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of the population in areas near nuclear power plants who die of cancer during a given year. The researchers at the Cancer Institute might have considered the two rival hypotheses of the form \(H_{0}: p=\) value for areas without nuclear facilities \(H_{a}: p>\) value for areas without nuclear facilities Did the researchers reject \(H_{0}\) or fail to reject \(H_{0} ?\) b. If the Cancer Institute researchers were incorrect in their conclusion that there is no increased cancer risk associated with living near a nuclear power plant, are they making a Type I or a Type II error? Explain. c. Comment on the spokesperson's last statement that no study can prove the absence of an effect. Do you agree with this statement?

Let \(\mu\) denote the true average lifetime (in hours) for a certain type of battery under controlled laboratory conditions. A test of \(H_{0}: \mu=10\) versus \(H_{a}\) : \(\mu<10\) will be based on a sample of size \(36 .\) Suppose that \(\sigma\) is known to be 0.6 , from which \(\sigma_{\bar{x}}=.1\). The appropriate test statistic is then $$ z=\frac{\bar{x}-10}{0.1} $$ a. What is \(\alpha\) for the test procedure that rejects \(H_{0}\) if \(z \leq-1.28 ?\) b. If the test procedure of Part (a) is used, calculate \(\beta\) when \(\mu=9.8\), and interpret this error probability. c. Without doing any calculation, explain how \(\beta\) when \(\mu=9.5\) compares to \(\beta\) when \(\mu=9.8\). Then check your assertion by computing \(\beta\) when \(\mu=9.5\). d. What is the power of the test when \(\mu=9.8\) ? when \(\mu=9.5 ?\)

Use the definition of the \(P\) -value to explain the following: a. Why \(H_{0}\) would be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=.0003\) b. Why \(H_{0}\) would not be rejected if \(P\) -value \(=.350\)

The paper "Playing Active Video Games Increases Energy Expenditure in Children" (Pediatrics [2009]: \(534-539\) ) describes an interesting investigation of the possible cardiovascular benefits of active video games. Mean heart rate for healthy boys age 10 to 13 after walking on a treadmill at \(2.6 \mathrm{~km} /\) hour for 6 minutes is 98 beats per minute (bpm). For each of 14 boys, heart rate was measured after 15 minutes of playing Wii Bowling. The resulting sample mean and standard deviation were 101 bpm and 15 bpm, respectively. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of boys as representative of boys age 10 to 13 and that the distribution of heart rates after 15 minutes of Wii Bowling is approximately normal. a. Does the sample provide convincing evidence that the mean heart rate after 15 minutes of Wii Bowling is different from the known mean heart rate after 6 minutes walking on the treadmill? Carry out a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=.01\). b. The known resting mean heart rate for boys in this age group is \(66 \mathrm{bpm}\). Is there convincing evidence that the mean heart rate after Wii Bowling for 15 minutes is higher than the known mean resting heart rate for boys of this age? Use \(\alpha=.01\). c. Based on the outcomes of the tests in Parts (a) and (b), write a paragraph comparing the benefits of treadmill walking and Wii Bowling in terms of raising heart rate over the resting heart rate.

Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha,\) are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free