Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The paper titled "Music for Pain Relief" (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, April 19 , 2006 ) concluded, based on a review of 51 studies of the effect of music on pain intensity, that "Listening to music reduces pain intensity levels ... However, the magnitude of these positive effects is small, the clinical relevance of music for pain relief in clinical practice is unclear." Are the authors of this paper claiming that the pain reduction attributable to listening to music is not statistically significant, not practically significant, or neither statistically nor practically significant? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The authors of the paper imply that the effect of music on pain relief, albeit statistically significant, may not be practically significant due to the small effect size and questionable clinical relevance.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Findings

Understand the given information. The authors of the paper have concluded that listening to music does reduce pain intensity levels. However, they also mention that the magnitude of these effects is small. This leads to uncertainty on the clinical relevance in practice.
02

Define Statistical and Practical Significance

To better interpret the authors' claims, clarifications on what is meant by statistical and practical significance is necessary. Statistical significance refers to the unlikely chance that the research findings happened by coincidence, hence the result matters. Practical significance on the other hand refers to the real world application and usefulness of the research findings.
03

Interpret the Authors' Claim

From the authors' statement, it seems that they have found a statistically significant result since they've observed that music reduces pain intensity based on the reviewed studies. However, they express doubt on its practical significance as they highlight the small magnitude of the effect and questioned its clinical relevance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Clinical Relevance of Research
When researchers dive into a new study, their findings must have meaning and value in the real world, especially in healthcare settings. This is referred to as the clinical relevance of research. It goes beyond the dry percentages and p-values, touching on the actual impact that an intervention or treatment has on patients.

For instance, in the study 'Music for Pain Relief,' while it was found that music did have an effect on pain intensity, the scale of this effect caused scientists to ponder its clinical relevance. Even a statistically significant finding can be of limited use to clinicians if the effect size is so small that it would not alter patient care or improve health outcomes in a noticeable way. To bolster their analysis, researchers might consider factors such as the cost of the intervention, its ease of implementation, and its long-term impact on patient health.
Interpretation of Research Findings
The process of breaking down and understanding research findings is pivotal not only for scientists and clinicians but also for students and the wider community.

To correctly interpret research findings like those in the 'Music for Pain Relief' study, it is important to look at the complete context. It is not only the presence of statistical significance that counts but also what this means for broader applications. Students should be encouraged to ask questions like: What does a reduction in pain intensity really entail? How can this be applied in a clinical setting? Are there any limitations or constraints that might affect the interpretation of the results? By approaching findings with a critical eye and considering both the numbers and the narrative behind them, one can better grasp their significance and utility.
Statistically Significant Results
A result is deemed statistically significant when it is likely not caused by chance. However, statistical significance does not always equate to a large or important effect. It's essential, especially for students, to understand that a small p-value doesn't automatically make a discovery groundbreaking or even useful.

In the context of the 'Music for Pain Relief' research, the authors identified statistically significant results — music can indeed reduce pain levels. Yet, they noted the overall effect was modest. For educational purposes, it's crucial to clearly communicate that statistical significance merely flags a relationship that is probably real, but it does not provide any information on the magnitude or practical implications of the finding. This distinction is vital in preparing students to critically evaluate research and understand real-world implications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assuming a random sample from a large population, for which of the following null hypotheses and sample sizes \(n\) is the large-sample \(z\) test appropriate: a. \(H_{0}: p=.2, n=25\) b. \(H_{0}: p=.6, n=210\) c. \(H_{0}: p=.9, n=100\) d. \(H_{0}: p=.05, n=75\)

In a survey of 1005 adult Americans, \(46 \%\) indicated that they were somewhat interested or very interested in having web access in their cars (USA Today, May I. 2009 ). Suppose that the marketing manager of a car manufacturer claims that the \(46 \%\) is based only on a sample and that \(46 \%\) is close to half, so there is no reason to believe that the proportion of all adult Americans who want car web access is less than \(.50 .\) Is the marketing manager correct in his claim? Provide statistical evidence to support your answer. For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be considered as representative of adult Americans.

For which of the following \(P\) -values will the null hypothesis be rejected when performing a test with a significance level of .05: a. .001 d. .047 b. .021 e. .148 c. .078

The international polling organization Ipsos reported data from a survey of 2000 randomly selected Canadians who carry debit cards (Canadian Account Habits Survey, July 24, 2006 ). Participants in this survey were asked what they considered the minimum purchase amount for which it would be acceptable to use a debit card. Suppose that the sample mean and standard deviation were \(\$ 9.15\) and \(\$ 7.60\), respectively. (These values are consistent with a histogram of the sample data that appears in the report.) Do these data provide convincing evidence that the mean minimum purchase amount for which Canadians consider the use of a debit card to be appropriate is less than \(\$ 10\) ? Carry out a hypothesis test with a significance level of .01 .

According to a survey of 1000 adult Americans conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 210 of those surveyed said playing the lottery would be the most practical way for them to accumulate \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth in their lifetime ("One in Five Believe Path to Riches Is the Lottery," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 11, 2006 ). Although the article does not describe how the sample was selected, for purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be regarded as a random sample of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free