Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The report "2007 Electronic Monitoring \& Surveillance Survey: Many Companies Monitoring. Recording, Videotaping-and Firing-Employees" (American Management Association, 2007 ) summarized the results of a survey of 304 U.S. businesses. Of these companies, 201 indicated that they monitor employees' web site visits. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample as representative of businesses in the United States. a. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that more than \(60 \%\) of U.S. businesses monitor employees' web site visits? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .01 . b. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that a majority of U.S. businesses monitor employees' web site visits? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .01

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that more than 60% of US businesses, as well as the majority of US businesses, monitor employees' web site visits.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

For part (a): The null hypothesis is that 60% businesses monitor their employees' website visits, represented as \(H_0: p = 0.60\). The alternative hypothesis is that more than 60% of the businesses monitor the websites, represented as \(H_1: p > 0.60\). For part (b): The null hypothesis is that majority of businesses (50%) monitor their employees' website visits, represented as \(H_0: p = 0.50\). The alternative hypothesis is that majority of businesses monitor their employees' website visits, represented as \(H_1: p > 0.50\).
02

Analyze sample data

The sample proportion of businesses that monitor their employees' websites is calculated by dividing the number of such companies by the total number of the companies surveyed. In this case, the sample proportion (\(\hat{p}\)) = 201/304 = 0.6618.
03

Perform the Hypothesis Test with Significance Level 0.01

Use the formula for hypothesis test: Z = ( \(\hat{p}\) - p) / sqrt [ p(1 - p) / n ]. For part (a): Using the values from step 2, and p = 0.60 from the null Hypothesis Z = (0.6618 - 0.60) / sqrt [ 0.60(1 - 0.60) / 304 ] = 4.07. For part (b): Using the values from step 2, and p = 0.50 from the null Hypothesis, Z = (0.6618 - 0.50) / sqrt [ 0.50(1 - 0.50) / 304 ] = 5.96.
04

Make a decision

Compare the calculated Z scores from step 3 with the critical Z score for the significance level of 0.01, which is 2.33. For part (a): Since the calculated Z score (4.07) is greater than the critical Z score, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to suggest that more than 60% businesses monitor their employees' web visits. For part (b): Since the calculated Z score (5.96) is greater than the critical Z score, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to suggest that majority of US businesses monitor their employees' web visits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement that suggests there is no effect or no difference in a situation and it serves as the starting point for hypothesis testing. It's essentially the default position that assumes no change or relationship exists. In the context of hypothesis testing, it's the hypothesis that we seek evidence against. In the exercise given, for part (a), the null hypothesis (\( H_0: p = 0.60 \)) expresses the belief that 60% of U.S. businesses monitor their employees' website visits.
For part (b), the null hypothesis (\( H_0: p = 0.50 \)) indicates that 50% of businesses monitor their employees' website visits, representing at least half or majority of such endeavors. When conducting a hypothesis test, we initially assume the null hypothesis is true until evidence suggests otherwise. This approach allows us to remain objective, as it relies on sampling evidence to make a decision.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis represents what we want to prove in the hypothesis testing process. It suggests that there is an effect or a difference. For both parts of the exercise, the alternative hypotheses point to a belief that more than 60% or 50% of businesses monitor their employees' website activities. Hence, it goes against the null. For part (a), the alternative hypothesis (\( H_1: p > 0.60 \)) states that the proportion of businesses monitoring employees is greater than 60%.
For part (b), it asserts that more than 50% of businesses undertake monitoring (\( H_1: p > 0.50 \)). From a statistical standpoint, aligning with the alternative hypothesis means we have found substantial evidence to support that there is indeed a significant difference or effect in the population.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as alpha (\( \alpha \)), is a threshold for determining when to reject the null hypothesis. It's the probability of making a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis, so it represents how much risk we are willing to take. In this exercise, the significance level is set at 0.01 or 1%. A lower value, like 0.01, means that there is a stricter criterion to meet before concluding that the results are statistically significant.
This level indicates a 1% risk that the test wrongly refutes the null hypothesis. When the calculated test statistic exceeds the critical value corresponding to the significance level, in this case, the Z-score threshold set by 0.01, we reject the null hypothesis. Choosing a significance level before testing helps ensure the procedure remains objective and centered on probability rather than subjective judgment.
Z-score
The Z-score is a statistical measure that tells us how far away a data point is from the mean in terms of standard deviations. It's used in hypothesis testing to determine how far the sample proportion is from the hypothesized population proportion under the null hypothesis. In the exercise, the Z-score is computed by using the formula:\[ Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}} \]where \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion, \( p \) is the assumed population proportion under the null hypothesis, and \( n \) is the sample size.
In part (a), the sample proportion of 0.6618 resulted in a Z-score of 4.07, which is far from the mean of 0.60, indicating a significant deviation. Similarly, for part (b), the Z-score calculated was 5.96. These scores are compared with a critical Z-value at the 0.01 significance level to determine if the deviations are statistically significant or not, leading to an informed decision about the hypotheses.
Proportion Testing
Proportion testing refers to statistical tests specifically designed to determine if there is a difference between observed proportions in a sample and expected proportions in the population. In this exercise, proportion tests are performed on the survey data to check if the proportion who monitor employees exceeds a certain threshold. This involves calculating the sample proportion by dividing the number of businesses monitoring web visits by the total number surveyed, resulting in \( \hat{p} = 0.6618 \).
The next step involves comparing this sample proportion to a hypothesized population proportion stated in the null hypothesis (0.60 for part a, and 0.50 for part b) using the Z-test formula. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value at the 1% significance level, we conclude that there is enough evidence to reject the null, suggesting that the actual proportions of businesses monitoring employees are indeed greater than what the null hypotheses state. This methodology is widely used in fields where comparing sample data to known or assumed population properties is essential.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Poll Finds Most Oppose Return to Draft, Wouldn't Encourage Children to Enlist" (Associated Press, December 18,2005 ) reports that in a random sample of 1000 American adults, 700 indicated that they oppose the reinstatement of a military draft. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of American adults who oppose reinstatement of the draft is greater than two-thirds? Use a significance level of .05 .

Explain why the statement \(\bar{x}=50\) is not a legitimate hypothesis.

In a survey conducted by CareerBuilder.com, employers were asked if they had ever sent an employee home because they were dressed inappropriately (June 17 . 2008 , www.careerbuilder.com). A total of 2765 employers responded to the survey, with 968 saying that they had sent an employee home for inappropriate attire. In a press release, CareerBuilder makes the claim that more than one- third of employers have sent an employee home to change clothes. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence in support of this claim? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05 .\) For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample as representative of employers in the United States.

According to a survey of 1000 adult Americans conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, 210 of those surveyed said playing the lottery would be the most practical way for them to accumulate \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth in their lifetime ("One in Five Believe Path to Riches Is the Lottery," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 11, 2006 ). Although the article does not describe how the sample was selected, for purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be regarded as a random sample of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of adult Americans believe that playing the lottery is the best strategy for accumulating \(\$ 200,000\) in net wealth?

The National Cancer Institute conducted a 2 -year study to determine whether cancer death rates for areas near nuclear power plants are higher than for areas without nuclear facilities (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune, September 17,1990 ). A spokesperson for the Cancer Institute said, "From the data at hand, there was no convincing evidence of any increased risk of death from any of the cancers surveyed due to living near nuclear facilities. However, no study can prove the absence of an effect." a. Let \(p\) denote the proportion of the population in areas near nuclear power plants who die of cancer during a given year. The researchers at the Cancer Institute might have considered the two rival hypotheses of the form \(H_{0}: p=\) value for areas without nuclear facilities \(H_{a}: p>\) value for areas without nuclear facilities Did the researchers reject \(H_{0}\) or fail to reject \(H_{0} ?\) b. If the Cancer Institute researchers were incorrect in their conclusion that there is no increased cancer risk associated with living near a nuclear power plant, are they making a Type I or a Type II error? Explain. c. Comment on the spokesperson's last statement that no study can prove the absence of an effect. Do you agree with this statement?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free