Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a survey of 1005 adult Americans, \(46 \%\) indicated that they were somewhat interested or very interested in having web access in their cars (USA Today, May I. 2009 ). Suppose that the marketing manager of a car manufacturer claims that the \(46 \%\) is based only on a sample and that \(46 \%\) is close to half, so there is no reason to believe that the proportion of all adult Americans who want car web access is less than \(.50 .\) Is the marketing manager correct in his claim? Provide statistical evidence to support your answer. For purposes of this exercise, assume that the sample can be considered as representative of adult Americans.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The final answer to this problem will be based on the calculated p-value. Since the calculation of this p-value requires access to statistical tables or software, it cannot be precisely determined within this context. However, if the p-value is less than 0.05, the marketing manager's claim will be considered incorrect. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, there is insufficient evidence to refute the marketing manager's claim.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

The first step in testing the marketing manager's claim is to define the null and alternative hypotheses. In this case, the null hypothesis (H0) would be that the population proportion is equal to 0.50, i.e., H0: p= 0.50. The alternative hypothesis (H1) would be that the population proportion is less than 0.50, i.e., H1: p < 0.50.
02

Test Statistic

The test statistic can be calculated using the formula: Z = (p̂ - p0) / sqrt((p0(1 - p0))/n), where p̂ is the sample proportion, p0 is the population proportion given by H0, and n is the sample size. Substituting the given values, we get Z = (0.46-0.50) / sqrt((0.50*(1 - 0.50))/1005).
03

Determine the p-value

The p-value associated with a given Z value reports the likelihood of finding a statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed statistic under the null hypothesis. It can be found using Z-tables or software. If the p-value is less than the significance level (usually chosen as 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis.
04

Conclusion

If the calculated p-value is less than the chosen significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and assert that the marketing manager's claim is not correct. Alternatively, if the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the marketing manager's claim could be correct.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis is a statement that implies no effect or no difference in the population. It is essentially a baseline against which we measure our results. For our exercise, the null hypothesis (denoted as \(H_0\)) suggests that the true population proportion of adult Americans who want car web access is \(0.50\).
This represents the claim that the proportion is similar enough to half, showing no significant difference from the proverbial midpoint.
In mathematical terms:
  • \(H_0: p = 0.50\)
Our goal is to test this claim against the evidence gathered from the sample.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis provides the opposite stance to the null hypothesis. It proposes that there is a significant effect or difference. When conducting a hypothesis test, we wish to see if the data provides enough evidence to support this alternative perspective.
In our given example, the alternative hypothesis (denoted as \(H_1\) or \(H_a\)) suggests that the true population proportion is less than \(0.50\), contradicting the marketing manager's statement.
Mathematically, this is expressed as:
  • \(H_1: p < 0.50\)
This suggests that less than half of adult Americans want web access in their cars.
P-value
The p-value plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing, as it helps quantify the evidence against the null hypothesis. It provides the probability of observing the test results under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.
A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis. In decision-making, we compare the p-value to a chosen significance level (usually \(0.05\)):
  • If \(\text{p-value} < 0.05\), we reject the null hypothesis.
  • If \(\text{p-value} \geq 0.05\), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
In this exercise, the p-value will help us determine if the difference between the surveyed and claimed proportions is statistically significant.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standard value we calculate from our sample data, which follows a certain distribution under the null hypothesis. For proportion tests, like in this exercise, we often use the Z-statistic, which tells us how far our sample proportion is from the assumed population proportion under the null hypothesis.
The formula for the Z-statistic in testing proportions is:
  • \[ Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}}} \]
where:
  • \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion (\(0.46\) in this case).
  • \(p_0\) is the population proportion under the null hypothesis (\(0.50\)).
  • \(n\) is the sample size (1005).
Computing this will give us our test statistic, which we use to find our p-value.
Population Proportion
Population proportion is a parameter that indicates the fraction of the population that shares a certain characteristic. In hypothesis testing, we often compare the observed sample proportion (\(\hat{p}\)) with an expected population proportion (\(p\)) based on past claims or analysis.
In our example, the survey suggests that \(46\%\) of adult Americans are interested in car web access, while the hypothesized population proportion (from the null hypothesis) is \(50\%\).
Understanding and comparing these proportions through hypothesis tests helps in verifying claims about the population and provides insights into whether the observed sample accurately reflects the broader population trend.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following quote from the article "Review Finds No Link Between Vaccine and Autism" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 19,2005 ): "'We found no evidence that giving MMR causes Crohn's disease and/or autism in the children that get the MMR, said Tom Jefferson, one of the authors of The Cochrane Review. 'That does not mean it doesn't cause it. It means we could find no evidence of it." (MMR is a measlesmumps-rubella vaccine.) In the context of a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis being that MMR does not cause autism, explain why the author could not conclude that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism.

Pairs of \(P\) -values and significance levels, \(\alpha,\) are given. For each pair, state whether the observed \(P\) -value leads to rejection of \(H_{0}\) at the given significance level. a. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.05\) b. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.003, \alpha=.001\) c. \(P\) -value \(=.498, \alpha=.05\) d. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.084, \alpha=.10\) e. \(\quad P\) -value \(=.039, \alpha=.01\) f. \(P\) -value \(=.218, \alpha=.10\)

The paper "Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences and Over-Indebtedness" (Social Science Research Network, Working paper W14808, 2008 ) included analysis of data from a national sample of 1000 Americans. One question on the survey was: "You owe \(\$ 3000\) on your credit card. You pay a minimum payment of \(\$ 30\) each month. At an Annual Percentage Rate of \(12 \%\) (or \(1 \%\) per month), how many years would it take to eliminate your credit card debt if you made no additional charges?" Answer options for this question were: (a) less than 5 years; (b) between 5 and 10 years; (c) between 10 and 15 years; (d) never-you will continue to be in debt; (e) don't know; and (f) prefer not to answer. a. Only 354 of the 1000 respondents chose the correct answer of never. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the sample is representative of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than \(.40(40 \%) ?\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) to test the appropriate hypotheses. b. The paper also reported that \(37.8 \%\) of those in the sample chose one of the wrong answers \((a, b,\) and \(c)\) as their response to this question. Is it reasonable to conclude that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Ann Landers, in her advice column of October 24,1994 (San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune), described the reliability of DNA paternity testing as follows: "To get a completely accurate result, you would have to be tested, and so would (the man) and your mother. The test is \(100 \%\) accurate if the man is not the father and \(99.9 \%\) accurate if he is." a. Consider using the results of DNA paternity testing to decide between the following two hypotheses: \(H_{0}:\) a particular man is the father \(H_{a}:\) a particular man is not the father In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) b. Based on the information given, what are the values of \(\alpha,\) the probability of a Type I error, and \(\beta,\) the probability of a Type II error? c. Ann Landers also stated, "If the mother is not tested, there is a \(0.8 \%\) chance of a false positive." For the hypotheses given in Part (a), what is the value of \(\beta\) if the decision is based on DNA testing in which the mother is not tested?

The report "Highest Paying Jobs for \(2009-10\) Bachelor's Degree Graduates" (National Association of Colleges and Employers, February 2010 ) states that the mean yearly salary offer for students graduating with a degree in accounting in 2010 is \(\$ 48,722\). Suppose that a random sample of 50 accounting graduates at a large university who received job offers resulted in a mean offer of \(\$ 49,850\) and a standard deviation of \(\$ 3300 .\) Do the sample data provide strong support for the claim that the mean salary offer for accounting graduates of this university is higher than the 2010 national average of \(\$ 48,722 ?\) Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free