Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The paper "Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences and Over-Indebtedness" (Social Science Research Network, Working paper W14808, 2008 ) included analysis of data from a national sample of 1000 Americans. One question on the survey was: "You owe \(\$ 3000\) on your credit card. You pay a minimum payment of \(\$ 30\) each month. At an Annual Percentage Rate of \(12 \%\) (or \(1 \%\) per month), how many years would it take to eliminate your credit card debt if you made no additional charges?" Answer options for this question were: (a) less than 5 years; (b) between 5 and 10 years; (c) between 10 and 15 years; (d) never-you will continue to be in debt; (e) don't know; and (f) prefer not to answer. a. Only 354 of the 1000 respondents chose the correct answer of never. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the sample is representative of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than \(.40(40 \%) ?\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) to test the appropriate hypotheses. b. The paper also reported that \(37.8 \%\) of those in the sample chose one of the wrong answers \((a, b,\) and \(c)\) as their response to this question. Is it reasonable to conclude that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) There is strong evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than 40%. (b) There is strong evidence that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question.

Step by step solution

01

Identify hypotheses for question (a)

Identify the null hypothesis \(H_0\) and the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\). Here, \(H_0: p = 0.4\) and \(H_a: p < 0.4\). The parameter of interest, \(p\), is the true proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly.
02

Calculate test statistic for question (a)

Formula for test statistic is (p̂ - p) / sqrt( (p(1 - p)) /n). Given that the sample proportion \(p̂ = 354/1000 = 0.354\), the number of sample \(n = 1000\), and \(p\) is in the null hypothesis \(H_0\), the value of test statistic is calculated as (0.354 - 0.4) / sqrt((0.4 * 0.6) / 1000) = -3.22.
03

Calculate P-value for question (a)

Given one-tailed test in the left direction, the P-value is the probability of getting a test statistic z ≤ -3.22 under the null hypothesis. Here, by using Standard Normal Distribution table or calculator, the P-value is calculated to be near 0.0006.
04

Make decision for question (a)

The rule is: reject \(H_0\) if P-value ≤ 0.05. Here, P-value = 0.0006, which is less than 0.05. Therefore, reject \(H_0\). This indicates that there is strong evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than 40%.
05

Identify hypotheses for question (b)

Similar to step 1, here the null hypothesis \(H_0\) is \(H_0: p = 0.33\) and the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) is \(H_a: p > 0.33\). The parameter of interest, \(p\), is the true proportion of adult Americans who would select a wrong answer to the question.
06

Calculate test statistic for question (b)

Using a similar method, given the sample proportion \(p̂ = 0.378\) and \(n = 1000\), the test statistic is calculated as (0.378 - 0.33) / sqrt((0.33 * 0.67) / 1000) = 2.88.
07

Calculate P-value for question (b)

Given one-tailed test in the right direction, the P-value is the chance of getting a test statistic z ≥ 2.88 under the null hypothesis. Here, by using Standard Normal Distribution table or calculator, the P-value is calculated to be near 0.002.
08

Make decision for question (b)

Similar to step 4, P-value = 0.002, which is less than 0.05. Therefore, reject \(H_0\). This indicates that there is strong evidence more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportions
In hypothesis testing, proportions are used to represent a fraction or a part of a whole. For instance, in the context of the problem, the proportion could represent the fraction of the total number of respondents who are able to correctly answer a question.

When we say the proportion of a certain outcome is 0.4, it means 40% of the sample has that specific characteristic. In our case, we're assessing if the true proportion of adult Americans who can correctly answer a financial literacy question, based on a sample of 1000, is less than 0.4.

It's important in statistical analyses because:
  • Proportions provide a way to express part-to-whole relationships in a dataset.
  • They allow for comparison between different groups or populations.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement used in statistics that suggests no effect or no difference in a study. It's a way to test whether any observed effects, like a difference in proportions, are due to chance.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (often represented as \(H_0\)) is the hypothesis that there is no effect present, or it's the hypothesis of "no difference." For example:
  • In question (a), the null hypothesis could be that the proportion of adults who answer the question correctly \( (p) \) is 0.4.
  • In question (b), it could be that the proportion of adults who would select a wrong answer \( (p) \) is 0.33, or exactly one-third.
The purpose of the null hypothesis is to enable a statistical test which can then provide evidence for or against it. If we reject the null hypothesis, it indicates that we see enough evidence to support an alternative hypothesis, suggesting there is an effect or a difference.
P-value
The p-value is a crucial part of hypothesis testing. It helps us determine the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. The p-value quantifies the probability of obtaining the observed sample results, or something more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

A small p-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so it gets rejected. Here’s how it applies to our case:
  • In question (a), a p-value of 0.0006 suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis that states 40% of the population knows the correct answer.
  • In question (b), the p-value of 0.002 provides strong evidence that more than one-third of adults would pick the wrong answer.
Remember, a p-value doesn't provide the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false. It simply indicates the likelihood of the sampled data under this hypothesis.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standardized value calculating how far the sample statistic is from the null hypothesis value. This calculation helps in determining whether the null hypothesis should be rejected.

It is determined through a formula that incorporates the sample proportion, the assumed population proportion under the null hypothesis, and the sample size. The formula used is:
  • \[ \text{Test Statistic} = \frac{\hat{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}} \]
Where \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion, \( p \) is the population proportion under the null hypothesis, and \( n \) is the sample size.

For question (a), the test statistic was calculated to be -3.22, while for question (b), it was 2.88. These values, when compared against critical values from the standard normal distribution, help in making a decision about the null hypothesis.
  • A test statistic far from zero provides evidence against the null hypothesis.
  • The sign of the test statistic helps in determining the direction of the effect.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do state laws that allow private citizens to carry concealed weapons result in a reduced crime rate? The author of a study carried out by the Brookings Institution is reported as saying, "The strongest thing I could say is that I don't see any strong evidence that they are reducing crime" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 23 . 2003 ). a. Is this conclusion consistent with testing \(H_{0}:\) concealed weapons laws reduce crime versus \(H_{a}:\) concealed weapons laws do not reduce crime or with testing \(H_{0}:\) concealed weapons laws do not reduce crime versus \(H_{a}\) : concealed weapons laws reduce crime Explain. b. Does the stated conclusion indicate that the null hypothesis was rejected or not rejected? Explain.

A television manufacturer claims that (at least) \(90 \%\) of its TV sets will need no service during the first 3 years of operation. A consumer agency wishes to check this claim, so it obtains a random sample of \(n=100\) purchasers and asks each whether the set purchased needed repair during the first 3 years after purchase. Let \(\hat{p}\) be the sample proportion of responses indicating no repair (so that no repair is identified with a success). Let \(p\) denote the actual proportion of successes for all sets made by this manufacturer. The agency does not want to claim false advertising unless sample evidence strongly suggests that \(p<.9 .\) The appropriate hypotheses are then \(H_{0}: p=.9\) versus \(H_{a}: p<.9\). a. In the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors, and discuss the possible consequences of each. b. Would you recommend a test procedure that uses \(\alpha=.10\) or one that uses \(\alpha=.01 ?\) Explain.

The article "Fewer Parolees Land Back Behind Bars" (Associated Press, April II, 2006 ) includes the following statement: "Just over \(38 \%\) of all felons who were released from prison in 2003 landed back behind bars by the end of the following year, the lowest rate since \(1979 . "\) Explain why it would not be necessary to carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the proportion of felons released in 2003 was less than .40 .

Consider the following quote from the article "Review Finds No Link Between Vaccine and Autism" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 19,2005 ): "'We found no evidence that giving MMR causes Crohn's disease and/or autism in the children that get the MMR, said Tom Jefferson, one of the authors of The Cochrane Review. 'That does not mean it doesn't cause it. It means we could find no evidence of it." (MMR is a measlesmumps-rubella vaccine.) In the context of a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis being that MMR does not cause autism, explain why the author could not conclude that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism.

A comprehensive study conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development tracked more than 1000 children from an early age through elementary school (New york Times, November 1,2005\()\). The study concluded that children who spent more than 30 hours a week in child care before entering school tended to score higher in math and reading when they were in the third grade. The researchers cautioned that the findings should not be a cause for alarm because the effects of child care were found to be small. Explain how the difference between the sample mean math score for third graders who spent long hours in child care and the known overall mean for third graders could be small but the researchers could still reach the conclusion that the mean for the child care group is significantly higher than the overall mean for third graders.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free