Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In response to budget cuts, county officials are interested in learning about the proportion of county residents who favor closure of a county park rather than closure of a county library. In a random sample of 500 county residents, 198 favored closure of a county park. For each of the three statements below, indicate if the statement is correct or incorrect. If the statement is incorrect, explain what makes it incorrect. Statement 1: It is unlikely that the estimate \(\hat{p}=0.396\) differs from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0429 Statement 2: The estimate \(\hat{p}=0.396\) will never differ from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0429 Statement 3: It is unlikely that the estimate \(\hat{p}=0.396\) differs from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0219

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fill the short answer after the calculations of standard error, margin of error, and evaluating each statement.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate standard error

First, we need to calculate the standard error of the proportion using the formula ~\( SE = \sqrt{ \hat{p} (1 - \hat{p}) / n} \). Substituting the given values, we get \( SE = \sqrt{ 0.396 * (1 - 0.396) / 500 } \).
02

Calculate margin of error

The margin of error (MOE) is usually approximated as 2 standard errors, so we should multiply our calculated standard error by 2 to obtain the margin of error. \( MOE = 2 * SE \).
03

Evaluate Statements 1 - 3

With the calculated margin of error, we can now evaluate each statement. If the specified value in each statement is within the margin of error from the sample proportion \( \hat{p} \), it is likely that the estimate \( \hat{p} \) could differ by that much from the actual population proportion. If not, the statement is incorrect. We evaluate each statement in turn.
04

Evaluate Statement 1

Statement 1 suggests that it is unlikely the estimate \( \hat{p} \) differs from the population proportion by more than 0.0429. If 0.0429 is within the margin of error calculated before, this statement is correct. Otherwise, it is incorrect.
05

Evaluate Statement 2

Statement 2 suggests that the estimate \( \hat{p} \) will never differ from the population proportion by more than 0.0429. The word 'never' makes this statement incorrect, because there is always a chance it could, even if it's within our calculated margin of error.
06

Evaluate Statement 3

Statement 3 suggests that it is unlikely the estimate \( \hat{p} \) differs from the population proportion by more than 0.0219. If 0.0219 is within the margin of error calculated before, this statement is correct. Otherwise, it is incorrect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standard Error
When estimating population proportions based on sample data, the standard error (SE) plays a crucial role. The standard error measures the variability or precision of the sample estimate, indicating how much the sample proportion can be expected to fluctuate from the true population proportion.

The formula to calculate the SE of a proportion is given by \( SE = \sqrt{ \hat{p} (1 - \hat{p}) / n } \) where \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion, and \( n \) is the sample size. A smaller SE indicates a more precise estimate, as the sample proportion is likely closer to the population proportion. Conversely, a larger SE implies more variability and a less reliable estimate.

Understanding SE helps in interpreting the reliability of the estimate: the larger the sample size, \( n \) , the smaller the SE, implying a more stable estimate of the population parameter. This is why increasing the sample size is a common method for reducing the uncertainty in our estimates.
Margin of Error
The margin of error (MOE) quantifies the range of values within which the true population parameter is expected to fall. It's crucial for understanding the level of uncertainty in a point estimate from a sample, allowing us to say how close the sample proportion is to the true population proportion.

The MOE is calculated by multiplying the standard error by a critical value that corresponds to a certain level of confidence (commonly the z-score for a desired confidence level). For simplicity, and assuming a 95% confidence interval, the critical value is often approximated as 2. Therefore, the MOE is approximated as \( MOE = 2 * SE \) .

A smaller MOE suggests that the sample proportion estimate is more precise, i.e., we can be more confident that the true population proportion lies within the calculated range around the sample proportion. A larger MOE implies a wider interval and hence less certainty about the proximity of the sample estimate to the population proportion.

The use of the term 'never' in relation to MOE, as seen in the exercise, is misleading. It suggests absolute certainty which is not possible in statistics; there's always a probability, however small, that the true parameter lies outside of the estimated range.
Sampling Distribution
The sampling distribution is a theoretical distribution of a statistic, like a mean or proportion, that we would obtain if we drew all possible samples of a given size from the population. It helps us to understand the behavior of the sample statistics and forms the basis for conducting statistical inference.

In the context of estimating a population proportion, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion can be approximated by a normal distribution, under the condition of a large enough sample size. This normal approximation is essential because it allows us to use the properties of the normal curve, such as specifying confidence intervals and testing hypotheses.

The Central Limit Theorem supports the use of the normal model for sampling distributions, stating that with a sufficiently large sample size, the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normal, regardless of the distribution in the population. A general rule of thumb is that this normal approximation is reasonable if both \( n\hat{p} \) and \( n(1-\hat{p}) \) are greater than 5.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A car manufacturer is interested in learning about the proportion of people purchasing one of its cars who plan to purchase another car of this brand in the future. A random sample of 400 of these people included 267 who said they would purchase this brand again. For each of the three statements below, indicate if the statement is correct or incorrect. If the statement is incorrect, explain what makes it incorrect. Statement 1 : The estimate \(\hat{p}=0.668\) will never differ from the value of the actual population proportion by more than \(0.0462 .\) Statement 2 : It is unlikely that the estimate \(\hat{p}=0.668\) differs from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0235 . Statement 3: It is unlikely that the estimate \(\hat{p}=0.668\) differs from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0462 .

USA Today (October 14,2002 ) reported that \(36 \%\) of adult drivers admit that they often or sometimes talk on a cell phone when driving. This estimate was based on data from a representative sample of 1,004 adult drivers. A margin of error of \(3.1 \%\) was also reported. Is this margin of error correct? Explain.

The article "Students Increasingly Turn to Credit Cards" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, July 21,2006 ) reported that \(37 \%\) of college freshmen and \(48 \%\) of college seniors carry a credit card balance from month to month. Suppose that the reported percentages were based on random samples of 1,000 college freshmen and 1,000 college seniors. (Hint: See Example 9.5\()\) a. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of college freshmen who carry a credit card balance from month to month. b. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of college seniors who carry a credit card balance from month to month. c. Explain why the two \(90 \%\) confidence intervals from Parts (a) and (b) are not the same width.

If two statistics are available for estimating a population characteristic, under what circumstances might you choose a biased statistic over an unbiased statistic?

An article in the Chicago Tribune (August 29, 1999) reported that in a poll of residents of the Chicago suburbs, \(43 \%\) felt that their financial situation had improved during the past year. The following statement is from the article: "The findings of this Tribune poll are based on interviews with 930 randomly selected suburban residents. The sample included suburban Cook County plus DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties. In a sample of this size, one can say with \(95 \%\) certainty that results will differ by no more than \(3 \%\) from results obtained if all residents had been included in the poll." Give a statistical argument to justify the claim that the estimate of \(43 \%\) is within \(3 \%\) of the actual percentage of all residents who feel that their financial situation has improved.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free