Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Will \(\hat{p}\) from a random sample of size 400 tend to be closer to the actual value of the population proportion when \(p=0.4\) or when \(p=0.7 ?\) Provide an explanation for your choice.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The problem doesn't provide enough data to make a definitive judgement. Therefore, without more information, we can't definitively say whether \(\hat{p}\) will be closer to p = 0.4 or p = 0.7. The closeness depends on the actual value of \(\hat{p}\) which we don't have.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Law of large numbers

The Law of Large Numbers is a theory in probability and statistics that suggests that as the size of a sample increases, the mean value of the sample will get closer to the mean value of the whole population. In other words, larger samples will provide estimates that are closer to the actual population parameters.
02

Apply the Law of large numbers to our problem

In the context of this exercise, the \(\hat{p}\) (sample proportion) should get closer to the p (population proportion) as the sample size increases. Here, our sample size is already large (400), hence, according to the Law of Large Numbers, our sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) should be closer to our population proportion p. As we have two different population proportions (0.4 and 0.7), the question becomes: which one will \(\hat{p}\) be closer to?
03

Compare \(\hat{p}\) with different values of p

The law of large numbers doesn't tell us that \(\hat{p}\) will necessarily be closer to p = 0.4 or p = 0.7. It simply tells us that as sample size increases, \(\hat{p}\) gets closer to p. The comparison of how close \(\hat{p}\) is to either 0.4 or 0.7 doesn't depend on the law of large numbers but depends on the difference between \(\hat{p}\) and p. Neither value is necessarily better or worse for the sample proportion to be closer to, it depends on the specific value of \(\hat{p}\). For a given sample, we calculate \(\hat{p}\) and then compare it to the two values of p to find out which one it is closer to.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Hospitals Dispute Medtronic Data on Wires" (The Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2010) describes several studies of the failure rate of defibrillators used in the treatment of heart problems. In one study conducted by the Mayo Clinic, it was reported that failures within the first 2 years were experienced by 18 of 89 patients under 50 years old and 13 of 362 patients age 50 and older. Assume that these two samples are representative of patients who receive this type of defibrillator in the two age groups. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of patients under 50 years old who experience a failure within the first 2 years. b. Construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of patients age 50 and older who experience a failure within the first 2 years. c. Suppose that the researchers wanted to estimate the proportion of patients under 50 years old who experience this type of failure with a margin of error of \(0.03 .\) How large a sample should be used? Use the given study results to obtain a preliminary estimate of the population proportion.

Based on data from a survey of 1,200 randomly selected Facebook users (USA Today, March 24, 2010), a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of all Facebook users who say it is not OK to "friend" someone who reports to you at work is (0.60,0.64) . What is the meaning of the \(90 \%\) confidence level associated with this interval?

For estimating a population characteristic, why is an unbiased statistic generally preferred over a biased statistic? Does unbiasedness alone guarantee that the estimate will be close to the true value? Explain

A random sample will be selected from the population of all adult residents of a particular city. The sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) will be used to estimate \(p,\) the proportion of all adult residents who are employed full time. For which of the following situations will the estimate tend to be closest to the actual value of \(p\) ? $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { i. } & n=500, p=0.6 \\ \text { ii. } & n=450, p=0.7 \\ \text { iii. } & n=400, p=0.8 \end{array} $$

The formula used to calculate a large-sample confidence interval for \(p\) is $$ \hat{p} \pm(z \text { critial value }) \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}} $$ What is the appropriate \(z\) critical value for each of the following confidence levels? a. \(95 \%\) b. \(98 \%\) c. \(85 \%\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free