Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An Associated Press article on potential violent behavior reported the results of a survey of 750 workers who were employed full time (San Luis Obispo Tribune, September 7 , 1999). Of those surveyed, 125 indicated that they were so angered by a coworker during the past year that they felt like hitting the coworker (but didn't). Assuming that it is reasonable to regard this sample as representative of the population of full-time workers, use this information to construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate of \(p,\) the proportion of all full-time workers so angered in the last year that they wanted to hit a coworker.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \(90 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the proportion of full-time workers who wanted to hit a coworker out of anger in the last year is \([0.1407, 0.1927]\), or equivalently, between 14.07% and 19.27%.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Sample Proportion (\(p\))

The sample proportion (\(p\)) is calculated as the number of successful outcomes (workers who wanted to hit a coworker) divided by the total number of outcomes (total workers surveyed). So, \(p = 125/750 = 0.1667\)
02

Calculate the Standard Error (SE)

The Standard Error (SE) for a proportion can be calculated using the formula \(\sqrt{p(1-p)/n}\), where \(n\) is the sample size. Substituting \(p = 0.1667\) and \(n = 750\), we find \(SE = \sqrt{0.1667 * (1 - 0.1667) / 750} = 0.0137\).
03

Determine the Z-Score for a 90% Confidence Level

A 90% confidence level corresponds to a z-score of approximately 1.645. This value can be found in standard z-tables which provides the z-score associated with the desired level of confidence.
04

Calculate the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval can be calculated using the formula \(p ± (z*SE)\), where \(z\) is the z-score and SE is the standard error. So, the confidence interval becomes \(0.1667 ± (1.645*0.0137) = [0.1407, 0.1927]\). This means that we can be 90% confident that the true proportion of all full-time workers who got so angered in the past year that they wanted to hit a coworker lies between 14.07% and 19.27%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Students Increasingly Turn to Credit Cards" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, July 21,2006 ) reported that \(37 \%\) of college freshmen and \(48 \%\) of college seniors carry a credit card balance from month to month. Suppose that the reported percentages were based on random samples of 1,000 college freshmen and 1,000 college seniors. (Hint: See Example 9.5\()\) a. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of college freshmen who carry a credit card balance from month to month. b. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of college seniors who carry a credit card balance from month to month. c. Explain why the two \(90 \%\) confidence intervals from Parts (a) and (b) are not the same width.

The report "2005 Electronic Monitoring \& Surveillance Survey: Many Companies Monitoring, Recording, Videotapingand Firing-Employees" (American Management Association, 2005) summarized a survey of 526 U.S. businesses. The report stated that 137 of the 526 businesses had fired workers for misuse of the Internet, and 131 had fired workers for e-mail misuse. Assume that the sample is representative of businesses in the United States. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. businesses that have fired workers for misuse of the Internet. b. What are two reasons why a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. businesses that have fired workers for misuse of e-mail would be narrower than the \(95 \%\) confidence interval calculated in Part (a)?

Consider taking a random sample from a population with \(p=0.40\) a. What is the standard error of \(\hat{p}\) for random samples of size \(100 ?\) b. Would the standard error of \(\hat{p}\) be larger for samples of size 100 or samples of size \(200 ?\) c. If the sample size were doubled from 100 to 200 , by what factor would the standard error of \(\hat{p}\) decrease?

The article "Nine Out of Ten Drivers Admit in Survey to Having Done Something Dangerous" (Knight Ridder Newspapers, July 8,2005\()\) reported on a survey of 1,100 drivers. Of those surveyed, 990 admitted to careless or aggressive driving during the previous 6 months. Assume that the sample is representative of the population of drivers. Answer the four key questions (QSTN) to confirm that the suggested method in this situation is a confidence interval for a population proportion.

A random sample will be selected from the population of all adult residents of a particular city. The sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) will be used to estimate \(p,\) the proportion of all adult residents who are registered to vote. For which of the following situations will the estimate tend to be closest to the actual value of \(p ?\) I. \(\quad n=1,000, p=0.5\) II. \(\quad n=200, p=0.6\) III. \(\quad n=100, p=0.7\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free