Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consumption of fast food is a topic of interest to researchers in the field of nutrition. The article "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children" (Pediatrics [2004]: 112-118) reported that 1,720 of those in a random sample of 6,212 American children indicated that they ate fast food on a typical day. a. Use the given information to estimate the proportion of American children who eat fast food on a typical day. b. Verify that the conditions needed in order for the margin of error formula to be appropriate are met. c. Calculate the margin of error. d. Interpret the margin of error in the context of this problem.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The estimated proportion of American children who eat fast food on a typical day is 27.7%. The conditions for the margin of error formula are met. The margin of error is 1.2%, which means we are 95% confident that the true proportion of American children who eat fast food on a typical day is between 26.5% and 28.9%.

Step by step solution

01

Estimating the proportion

To estimate the proportion, divide the number of children who ate fast food (1,720) by the total number of children in the sample (6,212). The resulting proportion is 1,720 / 6,212 = 0.277 or 27.7%.
02

Verifying conditions for margin of error formula

The conditions required for the margin of error formula to be appropriate are that the sample is a random sample, and that both np and n(1-p) are greater than 5. Here, the sample is given to be random. np = 6212 * 0.277 = 1720 and n(1-p) = 6212 * (1-0.277) = 4492, which are both greater than 5, so the conditions are met.
03

Calculating the margin of error

We calculate the margin of error using the formula \(E = z\sqrt{\frac{{p(1 - p)}}{{n}}}\), where E is the margin of error, z is the z-score for our confidence level (for a 95% confidence level, z is approximately 1.96), p is the sample proportion and n is the sample size. Plugging in our numbers, we get \(E = 1.96*\sqrt{(0.277*(1 - 0.277))/6212}\) = 0.012 or 1.2%.
04

Interpreting the margin of error

The margin of error gives us a range in which we expect the true proportion to lie, with a certain level of confidence. In this case, the margin of error is 1.2%, so we can say that we are 95% confident that the true proportion of American children who eat fast food on a typical day is between 26.5% and 28.9%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion Estimation
When researchers aim to understand the behavior of a large group based on a sample, estimating the sample proportion is a crucial step. In the context of nutrition research, as with our example of children consuming fast food, this involves determining the fraction of participants exhibiting the behavior of interest out of the total sample.

To estimate the proportion, one simply divides the number of individuals with the characteristic (those children who ate fast food) by the total number of individuals in the sample. In the exercise, the sample proportion becomes \(\frac{1720}{6212} = 0.277\) or 27.7%. This represents an estimate of the entire population's behavior, providing a snapshot that researchers can use to infer broader trends.
Verifying Conditions for Margin of Error
To ensure the reliability of conclusions drawn from a sample, certain conditions must be met before calculating the margin of error. These are essentially checks to verify that the sample data will give meaningful results when generalized to the population.

Firstly, the sample must be random. This requirement ensures that every member of the population has an equal chance of being included, which helps prevent bias. Secondly, the conditions that both \(np\) and \(n(1-p)\) exceed 5 are necessary when using a normal approximation for the binomial distribution. In our example, with \(np = 1720\) and \(n(1-p) = 4492\), both conditions are satisfied, indicating the margin of error computation is suitable for our sample.
Calculating Margin of Error
The margin of error quantifies the uncertainty inherent in estimating a population parameter from a sample statistic. To calculate it, one uses the formula \(E = z\sqrt{\frac{p(1 - p)}{n}}\), where \(E\) indicates the margin of error, \(z\) corresponds to the z-score linked with the desired confidence level, \(p\) is the sample proportion (the estimate of the true population proportion), and \(n\) is the sample size.

For a 95% confidence level, the z-score is approximately 1.96. Plugging in the values from our exercise, the calculation provides a margin of error of 0.012, or 1.2%. This figure represents the range within which the true population proportion is likely to fall and is pivotal in assessing the precision of our sample proportion.
Confidence Level Interpretation
The confidence level reflects the degree of certainty one has regarding the estimation of the population proportion based on the sample data. Interpreting the confidence level in relation to the margin of error allows us to state how sure we are that the actual value lies within a certain range around our sample estimate.

In our fast-food study, with a margin of error of 1.2% and a 95% confidence level, we express that we can be 95% confident the true proportion of American children who eat fast food on a typical day is between 26.5% (27.7% - 1.2%) and 28.9% (27.7% + 1.2%). This interval is known as the confidence interval, offering a range, not just a singular estimate, to account for possible sample variations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The formula used to calculate a large-sample confidence interval for \(p\) is $$ \hat{p} \pm(z \text { critial value }) \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}} $$ What is the appropriate \(z\) critical value for each of the following confidence levels? a. \(90 \%\) b. \(99 \%\) c. \(80 \%\)

High-profile legal cases have many people reevaluating the jury system. Many believe that juries in criminal trials should be able to convict on less than a unanimous vote. To assess support for this idea, investigators asked each individual in a random sample of Californians whether they favored allowing conviction by a \(10-2\) verdict in criminal cases not involving the death penalty. The Associated Press (San Luis ObispoTelegram-Tribune, September 13,1995 ) reported that \(71 \%\) favored conviction with a \(10-2\) verdict. Suppose that the sample size for this survey was \(n=900\). Construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of Californians who favor conviction with a \(10-2\) verdict.

It probably wouldn't surprise you to know that Valentine's Day means big business for florists, jewelry stores, and restaurants. But did you know that it is also a big day for pet stores? In January \(2010,\) the National Retail Federation conducted a survey of consumers in a representative sample of adult Americans ("This Valentine's Day, Couples Cut Back on Gifts to Each Other, According to NRF Survey," www.nrf.com). One of the questions in the survey asked if the respondent planned to spend money on a Valentine's Day gift for his or her pet. a. The proportion who responded that they did plan to purchase a gift for their pet was 0.173 . Suppose that the sample size for this survey was \(n=200\). Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of all adult Americans who planned to purchase a Valentine's Day gift for their pet. b. The actual sample size for the survey was much larger than 200\. Would a \(95 \%\) confidence interval calculated using the actual sample size have been narrower or wider than the confidence interval calculated in Part (a)?

In a survey of 1,000 randomly selected adults in the United States, participants were asked what their most favorite and least favorite subjects were when they were in school (Associated Press, August 17,2005\()\). In what might seem like a contradiction, math was chosen more often than any other subject in both categories. Math was chosen by 230 of the 1,000 as their most favorite subject and chosen by 370 of the 1,000 as their least favorite subject. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. adults for whom math was their most favorite subject. b. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of U.S. adults for whom math was their least favorite subject.

A researcher wants to estimate the proportion of property owners who would pay their property taxes one month early if given a \(\$ 50\) reduction in their tax bill. Would the standard error of the sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) be larger if the actual population proportion were \(p=0.2\) or if it were \(p=0.4 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free