Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For estimating a population characteristic, why is an unbiased statistic with a small standard error preferred over an unbiased statistic with a larger standard error?

Short Answer

Expert verified
An unbiased statistic with a small standard error is preferred over one with a larger standard error because it provides a more precise and reliable estimate of the population characteristic. A small standard error means our estimate is closer to the true population parameter.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Key Concepts

Begin by defining the three key statistical concepts central to the question: unbiased statistic, standard error, and population characteristic. An unbiased statistic is an accurate statistic that does not overestimate or underestimate the population parameter. Standard error is a measure of the statistical accuracy of an estimate, or the standard deviation of the sampling distribution. A population characteristic (or parameter) is a measure that describes a population, such as a population mean or a population proportion.
02

Examining the Difference in Standard Errors

Now, we need to consider what the difference is between small and large standard errors for an unbiased statistic. The smaller the standard error, the closer the sample statistic is likely to be to the population parameter. Conversely, a larger standard error could lead to the sample statistic being farther from the population parameter.
03

Explaining the Preference

Finally, we need to explain why a small standard error is preferred in estimating a population characteristic. A smaller standard error indicates a more precise estimate of the population parameter. Since the goal is to estimate the population parameter as accurately as possible, an unbiased statistic with a small standard error would give a better, more reliable estimate than one with a large standard error as it means our sample mean is closer to the actual population mean.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A large online retailer is interested in learning about the proportion of customers making a purchase during a particular month who were satisfied with the online ordering process. A random sample of 600 of these customers included 492 who indicated they were satisfied. For each of the three following statements, indicate if the statement is correct or incorrect. If the statement is incorrect, explain what makes it incorrect. Statement 1: It is unlikely that the estimate \(\hat{p}=0.82\) differs from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0157 . Statement 2 : It is unlikely that the estimate \(\hat{p}=0.82\) differs from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0307 . Statement 3: The estimate \(\hat{p}=0.82\) will never differ from the value of the actual population proportion by more than 0.0307 .

The formula used to calculate a large-sample confidence interval for \(p\) is $$ \hat{p} \pm(z \text { critial value }) \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}} $$ What is the appropriate \(z\) critical value for each of the following confidence levels? a. \(90 \%\) b. \(99 \%\) c. \(80 \%\)

Will \(\hat{p}\) from a random sample from a population with \(60 \%\) successes tend to be closer to 0.6 for a sample size of \(n=400\) or a sample size of \(n=800 ?\) Provide an explanation for your choice.

In a survey on supernatural experiences, 722 of 4,013 adult Americans reported that they had seen a ghost (“What Supernatural Experiences We've Had," USA Today, February 8,2010 ). Assume that this sample is representative of the population of adult Americans. a. Use the given information to estimate the proportion of adult Americans who would say they have seen a ghost. b. Verify that the conditions for use of the margin of error formula to be appropriate are met. c. Calculate the margin of error. d. Interpret the margin of error in context. e. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of all adult Americans who would say they have seen a ghost. f. Would a \(99 \%\) confidence interval be narrower or wider than the interval calculated in Part (e)? Justify your answer.

Will \(\hat{p}\) from a random sample of size 400 tend to be closer to the actual value of the population proportion when \(p=0.4\) or when \(p=0.7 ?\) Provide an explanation for your choice.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free