Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The authors of the paper "Flat-Footedness Is Not a Disadvantage for Athletic Performance in Children Aged 11 to 15 Years" (Pediatrics [2009]: e386-e392) collected data from 218 children on foot arch height and motor ability. The resulting data were used to investigate the relationship between arch height and motor ability.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, the analysis of the relationship between 'arch height' and 'motor ability' involves identifying the variables, analyzing the data through statistical methods, visualizing the data through graphs, and drawing conclusions based on this analysis.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Variables

The two variables we're looking at are 'arch height' and 'motor ability'. 'Arch height' is a quantitative variable measured in physical units, while 'motor ability' is also a quantitative variable measured in terms of a person's physical capabilities.
02

Data Analysis

The next step will be analyzing the data, and for this purpose, statistical methods are often used. Depending on the data type, techniques like group statistics, t-tests or correlation coefficient calculations may be useful.
03

Visualize the data

Visualizing the data can be helpful to identify any trends or patterns. This step often involves constructing a relevant graph, such as a scatter plot which can show the relationship between the two variables.
04

Formulate Conclusions

Based on the data analysis and visualization, conclusions about the relationship between 'arch height' and 'motor ability' can be drawn. If the correlation coefficient is strong and the scatter plot shows a clear trend, it can be concluded that there is a relationship between the two variables.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Want to Lose More Fat? Skip Breakfast Before Workout" (The Tribune, June 4,2010 ) is the headline of a newspaper article describing a study comparing men who did endurance training without eating before training and men who ate before training. Twenty men were assigned at random to one of two 6-week diet and exercise programs. Both groups followed a similar diet and performed the same daily morning exercise routine. Men in one group did the exercise routine prior to eating, and those in the other group ate first and then exercised. The resulting data supported the claim that those who do not eat prior to exercising burn a higher proportion of fat than those who eat before exercising. Is the inference made one that involves estimation or one that involves hypothesis testing?

In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, 146 participants were randomly assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement ("Garlic for the Common Cold," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009). Based on the study, it was concluded that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold. a. What claim about the effect of taking garlic is supported by the data from this study? b. Is it possible that the conclusion that the proportion of people taking garlic who get a cold is lower than the proportion for those not taking garlic is incorrect? Explain. c. If the number of people participating in the study had been \(50,\) do you think that the chance of an incorrect conclusion would be greater than, about the same as, or lower than for the study described?

Consider the population that consists of all people who purchased season tickets for home games of the New York Yankees. a. Give an example of a question about this population that could be answered by collecting data and using the data to estimate a population characteristic. b. Give an example of a question about this population that could be answered by collecting data and using the data to test a claim about this population.

To examine the effect of exercise on body composition, data were collected from a sample of active women who engaged in 9 hours or more of physical activity per week ("Effects of Habitual Physical Activity on the Resting Metabolic Rates and Body Composition of Women Aged 35 to 50 Years," Journal of the American Dietetic Association [2001]: 1181-1191). Percent of body fat was measured for each woman. The researchers planned to use the resulting data to learn about mean percent body fat for active women.

Comment on the following statement: The same statistical inference methods are used for learning from categorical data and for learning from numerical data.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free