Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Data from a poll conducted by Travelocity led to the following estimates: Approximately \(40 \%\) of travelers check their work e-mail while on vacation, about \(33 \%\) take cell phones on vacation in order to stay connected with work, and about \(25 \%\) bring laptop computers on vacation (San Luis Obispo Tribune, December 1,2005\()\). a. What additional information about the survey would you need in order to decide if it is reasonable to generalize these estimates to the population of all American adult travelers? b. Assuming that the given estimates were based on a representative sample, do you think that the estimates would more likely be closer to the actual population values if the sample size had been 100 or if the sample size had been \(500 ?\) Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To generalise these results, we need more info about the survey like sample size, selection method, etc. Larger sample sizes (500 instead of 100, for instance) increase precision, assuming the sample is representative

Step by step solution

01

Identify the needed additional information

To increase the reliability of the survey results, additional information is needed such as: 1. The sample size of the survey. 2. The method by which the participants were chosen. 3. Whether the sample was randomly chosen. 4. The location and time when the survey was conducted. 5. The demographics of the participants including age, gender, profession, etc. This information is necessary to check for any sampling bias, and to make sure that this sample is a good representative of all American adult travelers.
02

Analyze the effect of the sample size

Larger sample sizes generally result in estimates that are closer to the true population values. This is because they are more likely to capture the diversity and variability of the population. If the sample is representative, increasing the sample size from 100 to 500 would make the estimates more accurate and reliable.
03

Overall judgement

Thus, the specifics of the survey is critical for making credible generalizations about the population. And, if the sample is representative, increasing the sample size would likely yield estimates closer to the population values.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sampling Bias
Sampling bias refers to a flaw in the sampling process that produces a sample that is not representative of the population. This can occur when certain members of the population are systematically more likely to be selected for the sample, or if certain portions are under-represented or excluded altogether.

For instance, if Travelocity polled individuals who booked travel through their website, the sample might over-represent tech-savvy travelers who are more inclined to use technology during vacations. To avoid sampling bias:
  • Ensure the samples are selected randomly.
  • Use stratified sampling to obtain a balanced representation across different subgroups.
  • Avoid convenience sampling which may only capture a subset of the population that is easily accessible.
Understanding and mitigating sampling bias is crucial for obtaining reliable and valid survey results.
Representative Sample
A representative sample accurately reflects the characteristics of the population from which it is drawn. It's a mini-version of the population that includes individuals proportional to their prevalence in the overall group.

In Travelocity's survey, to check if the sample is representative, one should examine factors such as age distribution, gender, income levels, and frequency of travel. A representative sample must include a mixture of occasional and frequent travelers, individuals of varying technology-use habits, and so on, ensuring it represents all American adult travelers. Characteristics of the sample should align with known demographics of the actual population for the results to be generalized confidently.
Sample Size
Sample size is the number of participants included in a survey and it significantly influences the accuracy of the population estimates. In general, the larger the sample size, the more precise the estimate, as it reduces the margin of error and increases the level of confidence in the findings.

In the context of the Travelocity survey, increasing the sample size from 100 to 500 would likely result in estimates more reflective of the actual behaviors of American adult travelers, given that the sample is representative. This would decrease the statistical fluctuations known as sampling error, allowing for a more trustworthy extrapolation to the entire population.
Population Estimates
Population estimates are numerical values indicating the characteristics of an entire population based on the data collected from a sample. The goal is to extrapolate findings from the sample to the population, with an assumption that the trends in the sample are indicative of the population as a whole.

For credible population estimates, one must ensure the sample is free from bias and is sufficiently large. Precision of these estimates also hinges on using correct statistical methods and considering confidence intervals, which suggest the range within which the true population parameter lies, given the sample data. Assessing reliability includes determining how closely the survey questions reflect the actual behaviors or opinions being estimated, as was attempted in the case of the Travelocity data on travelers' technology use.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fans of professional soccer are probably aware that players sometimes fake injuries (called dives or flops). But how common is this practice? The articles "A Field Guide to Fakers and Floppers" (Wall Street Journal, June 28,2010 ) and "Red Card for Faking Footballers" (Science Daily, Oct. 10,2009) describe a study of deceptive behavior in soccer. Based on this study, it was possible to categorize injuries as real or fake based on movements that were characteristic of fake injuries (such as an arched back with hands raised, which is meant to attract the attention of a referee but which is not characteristic of the way people fall naturally). Data from an analysis of a sample of soccer games were then used to make the following statements: On average, referees stop a soccer game to deal with apparent injuries 11 times per game. \- On average, there is less than one "real" injury per soccer game. Are the inferences made ones that involve estimation or ones that involve hypothesis testing?

Should advertisers worry about people with digital video recorders (DVRs) fast-forwarding through their TV commercials? Recent studies by MillwardBrown and Innerscope Research indicate that when people are fast-forwarding through commercials they are actually still quite engaged and paying attention to the screen to see when the commercials end and the show they were watching starts again. If a commercial goes by that the viewer has seen before, the impact of the commercial may be equivalent to viewing the commercial at normal speed. One study of DVR viewing behavior is described in the article "Engaging at Any Speed? Commercials Put to the Test" (New York Times, July 3,2007 ). For each person in a sample of adults, physical responses (such as respiratory rate and heart rate) were recorded while watching commercials at normal speed and while watching commercials at fast-forward speed. These responses were used to calculate an engagement score. Engagement scores ranged from 0 to 100 (higher values indicate greater engagement). The researchers concluded that the mean engagement score for people watching at regular speed was \(66,\) and for people watching at fast-forward speed it was \(68 .\) Is the described inference one that resulted from estimation or one that resulted from hypothesis testing?

Suppose that a study was carried out in which each student in a random sample of students at a particular college was asked if he or she was registered to vote. Would these data be used to estimate a population mean or to estimate a population proportion? How did you decide?

Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www.decanter.com/news). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they tasted and rated a glass of wine. No music was playing in one of the rooms, and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The mean rating given to the wine under each of the five music conditions was reported. Is the described inference one that resulted from estimation or one that resulted from hypothesis testing?

Consider the population that consists of all students enrolled at your college. a. Give an example of a question about this population that could be answered by collecting data and using it to estimate a population characteristic. b. Give an example of a question about this population that could be answered by collecting data and using it to test a claim about this population.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free