Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Can moving their hands help children learn math? This question was investigated by the authors of the paper "Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas about Math" (Psychological Science [2009]: 267-272). A study was conducted to compare two different methods for teaching children how to solve math problems of the form \(3+2+8=-8 .\) One method involved having students point to the \(3+2\) on the left side of the equal sign with one hand and then point to the blank on the right side of the equal sign before filling in the blank to complete the equation. The other method did not involve using these hand gestures. To compare the two methods, 128 children were assigned at random to one of the methods. Each child then took a test with six problems, and the number correct was determined for each child. The researchers planned to see if the resulting data supported the theory that the mean number correct for children who use hand gestures is higher than the mean number correct for children who do not use hand gestures.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The question asked involves conducting a hypothesis test to compare the means of two groups - those children who used hand gestures while learning math and those who didn't. To answer the question, a hypothesis test should be set up, performed upon the test scores data, p-value determined and results interpreted in terms of the original question.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Hypotheses

The first step in any hypothesis test is to define the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. In this case, the null hypothesis (\(H0\)) would be that there is no difference between the mean score of children who used hand gestures and those who didn't. The alternative hypothesis (\(H1\)) is that the mean score of children who used hand gestures is higher than those who didn't.
02

Conduct the Test

Assuming the test is set up, the next step is conducting the test. Normally, this would involve gathering data (in this case, the test scores of the children) and performing a test statistic. The researchers did that already. The test statistic, which depends on the data and the type of test being run, will give us a measure of how much the observed data deviates from what was expected under the null hypothesis.
03

Determine the p-value

Once the test statistic is calculated, the next step is determining the p-value. This is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme given that the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is smaller than the chosen significance level (commonly 0.05), then the null hypothesis is rejected and we say that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
04

Interpret the Results

Lastly, the figures obtained (both the test statistic and the p-value) need to be interpreted in context of the question under investigation. Here, this would mean stating whether there is strong evidence that using hand gestures improves student's performance compared to not using them, based on the p-value.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do people better remember what they learned if they are in the same physical space where they first learned it? The authors of the paper "The Dynamics of Memory: ContextDependent Updating" (Learning \& Memory (2008): \(574-579\) ) asked people to learn a set of 20 unrelated objects. Two days later, these people were asked to recall the objects learned on the first day. Some of the people were asked to recall the objects in the same room where they originally learned the objects. The others were asked to recall the objects in a different room. People were assigned at random to one of these two recall conditions. The authors found that the data on the number of objects recalled supported the claim that recall is better when people return to the original learning context. Is the inference made one that involves estimation or one that involves hypothesis testing?

In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, 146 participants were assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement ("Garlic for the Common Cold," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009). Researchers planned to see if there is evidence that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold.

"Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article describing a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. People who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved, and \(27 \%\) of the 50 patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. The researchers used these data to determine if there was evidence to support the claim that the proportion of patients who improve is higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment.

Explain why the question T: Type of data-one variable or two? Categorical or numerical? is one of the four key questions used to guide decisions about what inference method should be considered.

Do children diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have smaller brains than children without this condition? This question was the topic of a research study described in the paper "Developmental Trajectories of Brain Volume Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder" (Journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: \(1740-\) 1747). Brain scans were completed for 152 children with ADHD and 139 children of similar age without ADHD. The researchers wanted to see if the resulting data supported the claim that the mean brain volume of children with ADHD is smaller than the mean for children without ADHD. (Hint: See Example 7.7)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free