Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Common Sense Media surveyed 1,000 teens and 1,000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show, Tell Too Much Online," San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen in a way that makes it reasonable to regard them as representative of American teens and parents of American teens. When asked if they check their online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checks his or her site more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. The researchers used these data to conclude that there was evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks a social networking site more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who report that they check the sites more than 10 times a day.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The researchers' conclusion is correct. The proportion of teenagers who reported checking their social networking sites more than 10 times a day (22%) is greater than the proportion of parents who believe their teen checks their social networking sites more than 10 times a day (4%).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Proportions

First, calculate the two proportions. For teens, the proportion is \(220/1000 = 0.22\) meaning 22% of teens reported frequently checking their social networking sites. Similarly for parents, the proportion is \(40/1000 = 0.04\) representing 4% of parents believe their child frequently checks their social sites.
02

Compare the Proportions

After calculating the two proportions, compare them. Here, the proportion of teens is 0.22 and the proportion of parents is 0.04. Thus, it can be observed that the proportion of teens reporting frequent use of social networking sites exceeds that of the parents' perception.
03

Conclude the Results

After the comparison, it becomes clear that the proportion of all parents who believe their teen checks a social networking site more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who report that they check their social sites more than 10 times a day. This aligns with the researchers' conclusion, meaning the researchers' conclusion was accurate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a study was carried out in which each student in a random sample of students at a particular college was asked if he or she was registered to vote. Would these data be used to estimate a population mean or to estimate a population proportion? How did you decide?

Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www.decanter.com/news). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they tasted and rated a glass of wine. No music was playing in one of the rooms, and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The mean rating given to the wine under each of the five music conditions was reported. Is the described inference one that resulted from estimation or one that resulted from hypothesis testing?

Do people better remember what they learned if they are in the same physical space where they first learned it? The authors of the paper "The Dynamics of Memory: ContextDependent Updating" (Learning \& Memory (2008): \(574-579\) ) asked people to learn a set of 20 unrelated objects. Two days later, these people were asked to recall the objects learned on the first day. Some of the people were asked to recall the objects in the same room where they originally learned the objects. The others were asked to recall the objects in a different room. People were assigned at random to one of these two recall conditions. The authors found that the data on the number of objects recalled supported the claim that recall is better when people return to the original learning context. Is the inference made one that involves estimation or one that involves hypothesis testing?

Should advertisers worry about people with digital video recorders (DVRs) fast-forwarding through their TV commercials? Recent studies by MillwardBrown and Innerscope Research indicate that when people are fast-forwarding through commercials they are actually still quite engaged and paying attention to the screen to see when the commercials end and the show they were watching starts again. If a commercial goes by that the viewer has seen before, the impact of the commercial may be equivalent to viewing the commercial at normal speed. One study of DVR viewing behavior is described in the article "Engaging at Any Speed? Commercials Put to the Test" (New York Times, July 3,2007 ). For each person in a sample of adults, physical responses (such as respiratory rate and heart rate) were recorded while watching commercials at normal speed and while watching commercials at fast-forward speed. These responses were used to calculate an engagement score. Engagement scores ranged from 0 to 100 (higher values indicate greater engagement). The researchers concluded that the mean engagement score for people watching at regular speed was \(66,\) and for people watching at fast-forward speed it was \(68 .\) Is the described inference one that resulted from estimation or one that resulted from hypothesis testing?

In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, 146 participants were randomly assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement ("Garlic for the Common Cold," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009). Based on the study, it was concluded that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold. a. What claim about the effect of taking garlic is supported by the data from this study? b. Is it possible that the conclusion that the proportion of people taking garlic who get a cold is lower than the proportion for those not taking garlic is incorrect? Explain. c. If the number of people participating in the study had been \(50,\) do you think that the chance of an incorrect conclusion would be greater than, about the same as, or lower than for the study described?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free