Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The article "Tots' TV-Watching May Spur Attention Problems" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, April 4, 2004) describes a study that appeared in the journal Pediatrics. In this study, researchers looked at records of 2,500 children who were participating in a long-term health study. For each child, they determined if the child had attention disorders at age 7 and the number of hours of television the child watched at age 3 . They hoped to use the resulting data to learn about how these variables might be related.

Short Answer

Expert verified
After analyzing the data, if a trend is observed showing that kids who watched more TV are more likely to have attention disorders, this suggests a correlation. A statistical test can quantify this correlation. However, this does not conclusively prove causation - that watching TV directly causes attention disorders.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Variables

The first step should be to identify and understand the two variables involved in the study. These are a) the number of hours of TV watched by the child at age 3, and b) whether the child had attention disorders at age 7.
02

Analyzing the Data

Next, organize the data for each child, taking note of the times spent watching TV and the presence or absence of attention disorders. A statistical tool like a scatter plot could be used to visually present the data. On the scatter plot, one could represent the hours of TV watched on the x-axis, and whether the child had attention disorders on the y-axis (maybe using '1' for 'yes' and '0' for 'no' or 'presence' vs 'absence').
03

Finding Correlations

Once the scatter plot is made, look for any trends or patterns in the distribution of data points. If there's a noticeable trend - for example, if kids who watched more TV are more likely to have attention disorders - that could suggest a correlation. Statistical tests such as Pearson's correlation or Spearman's rank correlation may be applied to quantitatively determine the strength and direction of any correlation.
04

Interpreting Results

Finally, based on observed patterns and statistical analyses, conclusions can be drawn about the relationship between the variables. Remember that correlation does not imply causation, so even a strong correlation would not conclusively prove that watching TV causes attention disorders. Other factors might also be at play.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the four key questions that guide the choice of an inference method. Two of these questions are Q: Question type. Estimation or hypothesis testing? S: Study type. Sample data or experiment data? What are the other two questions that make up the four key questions?

Fans of professional soccer are probably aware that players sometimes fake injuries (called dives or flops). But how common is this practice? The articles "A Field Guide to Fakers and Floppers" (Wall Street Journal, June 28,2010 ) and "Red Card for Faking Footballers" (Science Daily, Oct. 10,2009) describe a study of deceptive behavior in soccer. Based on this study, it was possible to categorize injuries as real or fake based on movements that were characteristic of fake injuries (such as an arched back with hands raised, which is meant to attract the attention of a referee but which is not characteristic of the way people fall naturally). Data from an analysis of a sample of soccer games were then used to make the following statements: On average, referees stop a soccer game to deal with apparent injuries 11 times per game. \- On average, there is less than one "real" injury per soccer game. Are the inferences made ones that involve estimation or ones that involve hypothesis testing?

Comment on the following statement: The same statistical inference methods are used for learning from categorical data and for learning from numerical data.

In a study of whether taking a garlic supplement reduces the risk of getting a cold, 146 participants were assigned to either a garlic supplement group or to a group that did not take a garlic supplement ("Garlic for the Common Cold," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009). Researchers planned to see if there is evidence that the proportion of people taking a garlic supplement who get a cold is lower than the proportion of those not taking a garlic supplement who get a cold.

The article "Display of Health Risk Behaviors on MySpace by Adolescents" (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine [2009]: 27-34) described a study of 500 publically accessible MySpace Web profiles posted by 18 -yearolds. The content of each profile was analyzed, and the researchers used the resulting data to conclude that there was support for the claim that those involved in sports or a hobby were less likely to have references to risky behavior (such as sexual references or references to substance abuse or violence). Is the described inference one that resulted from estimation or one that resulted from hypothesis testing?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free