Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that a study was carried out in which each person in a random sample of students at a particular college was asked how much money he or she spent on textbooks for the current semester. Would you use these data to estimate a population mean or to estimate a population proportion? How did you decide?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Given that the study asks about the amount spent on textbooks, a numerical value, it would be best to use these data to estimate a population mean, not a population proportion. This is because a mean is better suited for numerical data, as it provides a measure of central tendency.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Type of Data

The first step is to understand the type of data collected. In this exercise, we are given the amount each student has spent on textbooks. This data is numerical, as it can be measured in monetary terms. This is opposed to categorical data, which describes attributes or characteristics, such as a student's major, where they are from, or a yes/no response.
02

Decide Between Population Mean or Population Proportion

Based on the type of data, we can decide between population mean or population proportion. For categorical data, we'd estimate a population proportion. However, for numerical data, like what we have here, we'd estimate a population mean. This is because a mean gives us a measure of central tendency within numerical data, providing an idea of the 'average' expenditure on textbooks.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do children diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have smaller brains than children without this condition? This question was the topic of a research study described in the paper "Developmental Trajectories of Brain Volume Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder" (Journal of the American Medical Association [2002]: \(1740-\) 1747). Brain scans were completed for 152 children with ADHD and 139 children of similar age without ADHD. The researchers wanted to see if the resulting data supported the claim that the mean brain volume of children with ADHD is smaller than the mean for children without ADHD. (Hint: See Example 7.7)

The article "Tots' TV-Watching May Spur Attention Problems" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, April 4, 2004) describes a study that appeared in the journal Pediatrics. In this study, researchers looked at records of 2,500 children who were participating in a long-term health study. For each child, they determined if the child had attention disorders at age 7 and the number of hours of television the child watched at age 3 . They hoped to use the resulting data to learn about how these variables might be related.

Comment on the following statement: The same statistical inference methods are used for learning from categorical data and for learning from numerical data.

A study of fast-food intake is described in the paper "What People Buy From Fast-Food Restaurants" (Obesity [2009]: \(1369-1374\) ). Adult customers at three hamburger chains (McDonald's, Burger King, and Wendy's) at lunchtime in New York City were approached as they entered the restaurant and were asked to provide their receipt when exiting. The receipts were then used to determine what was purchased and the number of calories consumed. The sample mean number of calories consumed was \(857,\) and the sample standard deviation was 677 . This information was used to learn about the mean number of calories consumed in a New York fast-food lunch.

The article "More Communities Banning 'Television on a Stick"" (USA Today, March 23,2010 ) describes an ongoing controversy over the distraction caused by digital billboards along highways. One study mentioned in the newspaper article is described in "Effects of Advertising Billboards During Simulated Driving" (Applied Ergonomics [2010]: 1-8). In this study, 48 people made a \(9 \mathrm{~km}\) drive in a driving simulator. Drivers were instructed to change lanes according to roadside lane change signs. Some of the lane changes occurred near digital billboards. What was displayed on the digital billboard changed once during the time that the billboard was visible by the driver to simulate the changing digital billboards that appear along highways. Data from this study supported the theory that the time required to respond to road signs was greater when digital billboards were present. Is the inference made one that involves estimation or one that involves hypothesis testing? (Hint: See Example 7.1\()\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free