Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An article on the cost of housing in California (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 30,2001 ) included the following statement: "In Northern California, people from the San Francisco Bay area pushed into the Central Valley, benefiting from home prices that dropped on average \(\$ 4000\) for every mile traveled east of the Bay." If this statement is correct, what is the slope of the least squares regression line, \(\hat{y}=a+b x,\) where \(y=\) house price (in dollars) and \(x=\) distance east of the Bay (in miles)? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The slope of the least squares regression line is -\(\$4000). For every mile traveled eastward from the San Francisco Bay, the house prices drop by \(\$4000).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

The first step is to understand the problem here. We're looking at a direct relationship between distance and house pricing. Based on the information given, we can understand that as the distance from the Bay increases (a move to the east), house prices decrease. This relationship is linear and can be expressed using a simple linear regression line.
02

Identify Variables and Constants

Let's identify what we know. The dependent variable is the house price (y) and the independent variable (x) is the distance from the Bay. The drop in price per mile (\(\$4000)) is essentially the slope of the regression line, denoted by (b). The slope (b) represents the amount of change in y (price of the house) for a unit change in x (distance from the Bay). Since the prices are decreasing with distance, our slope is negative.
03

Determine the Slope of the Regression Line

In the question, it's stated that for each mile travelled east of the Bay, the price drops by \(\$4000). This exactly corresponds to the slope of our linear regression line, because the slope represents the rate of change of y with respect to x. So, the slope of the linear regression line, (b), is equal to -\(\$4000).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Slope of the Regression Line
Understanding the slope of a regression line is paramount when analyzing the relationship between two variables in statistics. In the context of linear regression, the slope is a measure that shows the average change in the dependent variable for every one-unit change in the independent variable.

To put this into a real-world context like the housing cost problem mentioned, imagine plotting a graph where every point represents a house's price based on its distance from a specific location. The slope indicates how steeply house prices are increasing or decreasing as you move further from that point. The exercise states that house prices drop by \(\$4000\) for every mile away from the Bay Area, which is interpreted as a negative slope. Mathematically, this slope (denoted as \(b\) in the regression equation \(\hat{y}=a+bx\)) is \(-\$4000\). It indicates that for every mile you travel east of the Bay Area, the average house price falls by \(\$4000\), showing a negative linear relationship between distance and price.

This concept is essential in predicting outcomes. For instance, if someone wanted to know the average price of a home 10 miles east of the Bay Area, they could use the slope to calculate this estimate.
Dependent and Independent Variables
In any scientific experiment or statistical analysis, it's critical to identify which variable is the cause (independent) and which is the effect (dependent). The independent variable is the one you change on purpose to see what effect it has. In contrast, the dependent variable is what you measure to see if it was affected.

In our housing cost scenario, the independent variable, represented by \(x\), is the distance from the Bay Area. It's what we presume is influencing the other variable. The dependent variable, denoted by \(y\), is the house price, because it's expected to change in response to the distance from the Bay. By understanding these roles, one can discern that changing the independent variable will result in a variation in the dependent variable, which is depicted graphically as a regression line where the slope reflects the direction and rate of this change.
Rate of Change
The rate of change is a concept that goes hand-in-hand with the notion of slope. It quantifies how rapidly the dependent variable changes in relation to the independent variable. In the context of linear regression, the rate of change is consistent along the regression line, which reflects the 'linear' aspect of the relationship between the two variables.

For our example with housing costs, the constant rate of change is indicated by the constant slope of \(-\$4000\) per mile. This means that no matter how far you are from the Bay Area, the price will always decrease by the same amount for each additional mile eastward. This simplicity enables us to make straightforward predictions about house pricing at varying distances. It's a powerful piece of information for potential homeowners who want to estimate housing costs based on location, or for economists studying the impact of location on housing prices.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Digit Ratio as an Indicator of Numeracy Relative to Literacy in 7-Year-Old British Schoolchildren" (British Journal of Psychology [2008]: \(75-85\) ) investigated a possible relationship between \(x=\) digit ratio (the ratio of the length of the second finger to the length of the fourth finger) and \(y=\) difference between numeracy score and literacy score on a national assessment. (The digit ratio is thought to be inversely related to the level of prenatal testosterone exposure.) The authors concluded that children with smaller digit ratios tended to have larger differences in test scores, meaning that they tended to have a higher numeracy score than literacy score. This conclusion was based on a correlation coefficient of \(r=-0.22 .\) Does the value of the correlation coefficient indicate that there is a strong linear relationship? Explain why or why not.

The article "Examined Life: What Stanley H. Kaplan Taught Us About the SAT" (The New Yorker [December 17, 2001]: \(86-92\) ) included a summary of findings regarding the use of SAT I scores, SAT II scores, and high school grade point average (GPA) to predict first-year college GPA. The article states that "among these, SAT II scores are the best predictor, explaining 16 percent of the variance in first-year college grades. GPA was second at 15.4 percent, and SAT I was last at 13.3 percent." a. If the data from this study were used to fit a least squares regression line with \(y=\) first-year college GPA and \(x=\) high school GPA, what would be the value of \(r^{2} ?\) b. The article stated that SAT II was the best predictor of first-year college grades. Do you think that predictions based on a least-squares line with \(y=\) first-year college GPA and \(x=\) SAT II score would be very accurate? Explain why or why not.

Briefly explain why a small value of \(s_{e}\) is desirable in a regression setting.

Data on \(y=\) time to complete a task (in minutes) and \(x=\) number of hours of sleep on previous night were used to find the least squares regression line. The equation of the line was \(\hat{y}=12-0.36 x .\) For this data set, would the sum of squared deviations from the line \(y=12.5-0.5 x\) be larger or smaller than the sum of squared deviations from the least squares regression line? Explain your choice. (Hint: Think about the definition of the least- squares regression line.)

It may seem odd, but biologists can tell how old a lobster is by measuring the concentration of pigment in the lobster's eye. The authors of the paper "Neurolipofuscin Is a Measure of Age in Panulirus argus, the Caribbean Spiny Lobster, in Florida" (Biological Bulletin [2007]: 55-66) wondered if it was sufficient to measure the pigment in just one eye, which would be the case if there is a strong relationship between the concentration in the right eye and the concentration in the left eye. Pigment concentration (as a percentage of tissue sample) was measured in both eyes for 39 lobsters, resulting in the following summary quantities (based on data from a graph in the paper): $$ \begin{array}{cll} n=39 & \sum_{x}=88.8 & \sum y=86.1 \\ \sum x y=281.1 & \sum x^{2}=288.0 & \sum y^{2}=286.6 \end{array} $$ An alternative formula for calculating the correlation coefficient that doesn't involve calculating the z-scores is $$ r=\frac{\sum_{x y}-\frac{\left(\sum x\right)\left(\sum y\right)}{n}}{\sqrt{\sum x^{2}-\frac{\left(\sum x\right)^{2}}{n}} \sqrt{\sum y^{2}-\frac{\left(\sum y\right)^{2}}{n}}} $$ Use this formula to calculate the value of the correlation coefficient, and interpret this value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free