Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A sample of automobiles traveling on a particular segment of a highway is selected. Each one travels at roughly a constant rate of speed, although speed does vary from auto to auto. Let \(x=\) speed and \(y=\) time needed to travel this segment. Would the sample correlation coefficient be closest to \(0.9,0.3,-0.3,\) or \(-0.9 ?\) Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample correlation coefficient would most likely be closest to \(-0.9\), indicating a strong inverse relationship between speed and time.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the relationship between variables

Determine the relationship between the variables. The relationship between speed (x) and time (y) is inverse or negative. As one increases, the other decreases.
02

Correlation analysis

On analyzing the correlation options given, we can rule out the positive values \(0.9\) and \(0.3\) as they represent a positive correlation. We are left with two options, \(-0.9\) and \(-0.3\). A correlation of \(-0.9\) indicates a strong negative correlation while \(-0.3\) indicates a weak negative correlation.
03

Determine the most likely correlation

Since we know the relationship between speed and time is a strong inverse one, based on real-life experience, we can assume that the correlation coefficient would be closer to \(-0.9\) rather than \(-0.3\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Digit Ratio as an Indicator of Numeracy Relative to Literacy in 7-Year-Old British Schoolchildren" (British Journal of Psychology [2008]: \(75-85\) ) investigated a possible relationship between \(x=\) digit ratio (the ratio of the length of the second finger to the length of the fourth finger) and \(y=\) difference between numeracy score and literacy score on a national assessment. (The digit ratio is thought to be inversely related to the level of prenatal testosterone exposure.) The authors concluded that children with smaller digit ratios tended to have larger differences in test scores, meaning that they tended to have a higher numeracy score than literacy score. This conclusion was based on a correlation coefficient of \(r=-0.22 .\) Does the value of the correlation coefficient indicate that there is a strong linear relationship? Explain why or why not.

The paper "Noncognitive Predictors of Student Athletes' Academic Performance" (Journal of College Reading and Learning [2000]: e167) summarizes a study of 200 Division I athletes. It was reported that the correlation coefficient for college grade point average (GPA) and a measure of academic self-worth was \(r=0.48 .\) Also reported were the correlation coefficient for college GPA and high school GPA \((r=0.46)\) and the correlation coefficient

Briefly explain why it is important to consider the value of \(r^{2}\) in addition to the value of \(s\) when evaluating the usefulness of the least squares regression line.

What does it mean when we say that the regression line is the least squares line?

The paper "School Achievement Strongly Predicts Midlife IQ" (Intelligence [2007]: \(563-567\) ) examined the relationship between school achievement test scores in grades 3 to 8 and IQ measured many years later. The authors reported an association between school achievement test score and midlife IQ, with a correlation coefficient of \(r=0.64\) a. Interpret the value of the correlation coefficient. b. A science writer commenting on this paper (Livescience, April 16,2007\()\) said that the correlation between school achievement test scores and IQ was very strong - even stronger than the correlation between height and weight in adults. Which of the following values for correlation between height and weight in adults is consistent with this statement? Justify your choice. \(\begin{array}{lllll}r=-0.8 & r=-0.3 & r=0.0 & r=0.6 & r=0.8\end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free