Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For each of the following pairs of variables, indicate whether you would expect a positive correlation, a negative correlation, or a correlation close to \(0 .\) Explain your choice. a. Weight of a car and gas mileage b. Size and selling price of a house c. Height and weight d. Height and number of siblings

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Negative correlation: As car weight increases, gas mileage decreases. b) Positive correlation: As house size increases, its selling price also increases. c) Positive correlation: As height increases, weight usually also increases. d) Correlation is close to 0: There is no systematic increase or decrease between a person's height and the number of siblings they have.

Step by step solution

01

Correlation of weight of a car and gas mileage

Generally, the heavier a vehicle is, the more gas it consumes to move, hence the lesser the mileage it offers. Therefore, the correlation between the weight of a car and gas mileage could be considered negative. As car weight increases, gas mileage decreases.
02

Correlation of size and selling price of a house

Usually, bigger houses tend to cost more because they offer more living space. Therefore, the correlation between the size of a house and its selling price could be considered positive. As house size increases, its selling price also increases.
03

Correlation of height and weight

Typically, taller individuals tend to weigh more because they have a larger body mass. This leads to a positive correlation. As height increases, weight usually also increases.
04

Correlation of height and number of siblings

There seems to be no logical relation between a person's height and the number of siblings they have, therefore, the correlation can be considered close to 0. One variable does not increase or decrease systematically with the other.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "School Achievement Strongly Predicts Midlife IQ" (Intelligence [2007]: \(563-567\) ) examined the relationship between school achievement test scores in grades 3 to 8 and IQ measured many years later. The authors reported an association between school achievement test score and midlife IQ, with a correlation coefficient of \(r=0.64\) a. Interpret the value of the correlation coefficient. b. A science writer commenting on this paper (Livescience, April 16,2007\()\) said that the correlation between school achievement test scores and IQ was very strong - even stronger than the correlation between height and weight in adults. Which of the following values for correlation between height and weight in adults is consistent with this statement? Justify your choice. \(\begin{array}{lllll}r=-0.8 & r=-0.3 & r=0.0 & r=0.6 & r=0.8\end{array}\)

The paper "Noncognitive Predictors of Student Athletes' Academic Performance" (Journal of College Reading and Learning [2000]: e167) summarizes a study of 200 Division I athletes. It was reported that the correlation coefficient for college grade point average (GPA) and a measure of academic self-worth was \(r=0.48 .\) Also reported were the correlation coefficient for college GPA and high school GPA \((r=0.46)\) and the correlation coefficient

Data on \(y=\) time to complete a task (in minutes) and \(x=\) number of hours of sleep on previous night were used to find the least squares regression line. The equation of the line was \(\hat{y}=12-0.36 x .\) For this data set, would the sum of squared deviations from the line \(y=12.5-0.5 x\) be larger or smaller than the sum of squared deviations from the least squares regression line? Explain your choice. (Hint: Think about the definition of the least- squares regression line.)

Briefly explain why a small value of \(s_{e}\) is desirable in a regression setting.

For a given data set, the sum of squared deviations from the line \(y=40+6 x\) is \(529.5 .\) For this same data set, which of the following could be the sum of squared deviations from the least squares regression line? Explain your choice. i. 308.6 ii. 529.6 iii. 617.4

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free