Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Packages of mixed nuts made by a certain company contain four types of nuts. The percentages of nuts of Types \(1,2,3,\) and 4 are advertised to be \(40 \%, 30 \%, 20 \%,\) and \(10 \%,\) respectively. A random sample of nuts is selected, and each one is categorized by type. a. If the sample size is 200 and the resulting test statistic value is \(X^{2}=19.0,\) what conclusion would be appropriate for a significance level of \(0.001 ?\) b. If the random sample had consisted of only 40 nuts, would you use the chi- square goodness-of-fit test? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Since the test statistic value of 19.0 is greater than the critical value of 16.27, reject the null hypothesis. There is evidence at a 0.001 level of significance to suggest that the nut mixture differs from the advertised proportions. \nb) Yes, the chi-square test can be used for a sample size of 40, as all the expected counts are above 5.

Step by step solution

01

Check Critical Chi-Square Value for Significance Level

Use a chi-square distribution table to find the critical chi-square value. For a significance level of 0.001 and 3 degrees of freedom (4 - 1, because there are 4 types of nuts), the critical chi-square value is 16.27.
02

Compare Test Statistic to Critical Value

Given that the test statistic value (\(X^{2}\)) is 19.0, this is greater than the critical value. So the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is evidence at a 0.001 level of significance, suggesting that the nut mixture differs from the advertised proportions.
03

Apply Chi-Square Test to Different Sample Size

For a sample size of 40, check each expected count. The expected count for each nut type is calculated by multiplying the sample size by the respective proportion. This gives: \nType 1 -> 40 * 0.4 = 16, \nType 2 -> 40 * 0.3 = 12, \nType 3 -> 40 * 0.2 = 8, \nType 4 -> 40 * 0.1 = 4 \nAll of these values are above 5, thus meeting the requirement for a Chi-square test (expected count for each category should be 5 or more). Consequently, a chi-square goodness-of-fit test can be used.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Chi-Square Value
When conducting a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, the critical chi-square value is essential in making a statistical decision. It's the benchmark against which the test statistic is compared. This value is determined based on the desired level of significance, which reflects the researcher's tolerance for error. For instance, a significance level of 0.001 means we allow just a 0.1% chance of wrongly rejecting the null hypothesis.

Using a chi-square distribution table or software, we can find the critical value that corresponds to this significance level and the degrees of freedom for our test. If our calculated test statistic exceeds this critical boundary, we move to reject the null hypothesis, implying that the observed data does not fit the expected distribution well. In the case of our exercise, the critical value is 16.27 for 3 degrees of freedom, and since our test statistic of 19.0 is greater, we reject the null.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis in a chi-square goodness-of-fit test expresses the assumption that there's no significant difference between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies. It's the default position that holds the observed outcomes are likely the result of random chance.

In the context of the exercise, the null hypothesis claims that the actual distribution of nuts in the packages aligns with the advertised percentages. By calculating the chi-square test statistic and comparing it to the critical chi-square value, we can make an informed decision on whether to maintain this hypothesis or to reject it in favor of an alternative hypothesis that suggests a significant discrepancy.
Expected Count
Expected count is a cornerstone concept in the chi-square goodness-of-fit test, representing the frequency we would expect in each category if the null hypothesis were true. To calculate the expected counts, we multiply the total sample size by the expected proportion for each category.

In our nuts mix exercise, if we have a sample of 200 nuts, the expected count for Type 1 nuts is 200 multiplied by 40%, giving us 80 nuts. It's important to note that the reliability of the chi-square test results partly hinges on these expected counts being sufficiently large. Typically, each expected count should be 5 or greater to ensure that the chi-square distribution is an appropriate model for the sampling distribution.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom in a chi-square test refer to the number of categories reduced by the number of parameters estimated from the data. Generally, it's the count of values that are free to vary as we estimate the characteristics of a population from a sample.

In chi-square tests, degrees of freedom are calculated as the number of categories minus 1 (df = k - 1). This subtraction is due to the constraint that the expected frequencies must sum up to the sample size. For the nut package example, with four types of nuts, our degrees of freedom would be 3 (4-1). This information is crucial when using statistical tables or software to determine the critical chi-square value for making decisions based on our test statistic.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does viewing angle affect a person's ability to tell the difference between a female nose and a male nose? This important (?) research question was examined in the article "You Can Tell by the Nose: Judging Sex from an Isolated Facial Feature" (Perception [1995]: \(969-973\) ). Eight Caucasian males and eight Caucasian females posed for nose photos. The article states that none of the volunteers wore nose studs or had prominent nasal hair. Each person placed a black Lycra tube over his or her head in such a way that only the nose protruded through a hole in the material. Photos were then taken from three different angles: front view, three-quarter view, and profile. These photos were shown to a sample of undergraduate students. Each student in the sample was shown one of the nose photos and asked whether it was a photo of a male or a female. The response was classified as either correct or incorrect. The accompanying table was constructed using summary values reported in the article. Is there evidence that the proportion of correct sex identifications differs for the three different nose views?

Give an example of a situation where it would be appropriate to use a chi- square test of homogeneity. Describe the populations that would be sampled and the variable that would be recorded.

Packages of mixed nuts made by a certain company contain four types of nuts. The percentages of nuts of Types \(1,2,3,\) and 4 are advertised to be \(40 \%, 30 \%, 20 \%,\) and \(10 \%,\) respectively. A random sample of nuts is selected, and each one is categorized by type. a. If the sample size is 200 and the resulting test statistic value is \(X^{2}=19.0,\) what conclusion would be appropriate for a significance level of \(0.001 ?\) b. If the random sample had consisted of only 40 nuts, would you use the chi- square goodness-of-fit test? Explain your reasoning.

The paper "Overweight Among Low-Income Preschool Children Associated with the Consumption of Sweet Drinks" (Pediatrics [2005]: 223-229) described a study of children who were underweight or normal weight at age 2 . Children in the sample were classified according to the number of sweet drinks consumed per day and whether or not the child was overweight one year after the study began. Is there evidence of an association between whether or not children are overweight after one year and the number of sweet drinks consumed? Assume that the sample of children in this study is representative of 2 - to 3 -year-old children, Test the appropriate hypotheses using a 0.05 significance level.

The following passage is from the paper "Gender Differences in Food Selections of Students at a Historically Black College and University" (College Student Journal \([2009]: 800-806):\) Also significant was the proportion of males and their water consumption ( 8 oz. servings) compared to females \(\left(X^{2}=8.166, P=.086\right) .\) Males came closest to meeting recommended daily water intake ( 64 oz. or more) than females \((29.8 \%\) vs. \(20.9 \%)\) This statement was based on carrying out a chi-square test of homogeneity using data in a two-way table where rows corresponded to gender (male, female) and columns corresponded to number of servings of water consumed per day, with categories none, one, two to three, four to five, and six or more. a. What hypotheses did the researchers test? What is the number of degrees of freedom associated with the reported value of the \(X^{2}\) statistic? b. The researchers based their statement on a test with a significance level of 0.10 . Would they have reached the same conclusion if a significance level of 0.05 had been used? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free