Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(C1) The paper "Effects of Caffeine on Repeated Sprint Ability, Reactive Agility Time, Sleep and Next Day Performance" (Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness [2010]: 455 - 464) describes an experiment in which male athlete volunteers who were considered low caffeine consumers were assigned at random to one of two experimental groups. Those assigned to the caffeine group drank a beverage which contained caffeine 1 hour before an exercise session. Those in the no- caffeine group drank a beverage that did not contain caffeine 1 hour before an exercise session. That night, participants wore a device that measures sleep activity. The researchers reported that there was no significant difference in mean sleep duration for the two experimental groups. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that there is no significant difference in the group means. In particular, explain if this means that the mean sleep durations for the two groups are equal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The term 'no significant difference' in this context means that, statistically speaking, the observed difference in average sleep durations between the caffeine and no-caffeine groups could be due to chance, and is not large enough to attribute to the effect of caffeine. It's important to note that, this does not mean the mean sleep durations for the two groups are exactly equal, but that any difference is not statistically significant.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding 'no significant difference'

In statistical parlance, saying that there is 'no significant difference' does not necessarily suggest that the two average sleep durations are exactly the same. Instead, it infers that the observed difference in the average sleep durations between the two groups could have occurred by chance alone, given the variability in the data. This chance difference is not statistically significant enough to confidently say that the difference is due to the effect of caffeine.
02

Understanding the meaning of group means

Group means, in this case, refer to the average sleep duration for the caffeine group and the no-caffeine group. When the experiment says that there is no significant difference, it means that these two means are not significantly different in statistical terms.
03

Interpreting 'no significant difference'

Thus, having 'no significant difference' does not imply that the mean sleep durations for the two groups are exactly equal. Instead, it suggests that the observed difference is small enough to likely be the result of random variation or chance, rather than being due to the effect of caffeine. Thus, based on the results of this experiment, we can conclude that the consumption of caffeine prior to an exercise session does not significantly influence sleep duration.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a type of scientific experiment which aims to reduce certain types of bias when testing the effectiveness of new treatments. This approach is considered the gold standard in clinical trials because it provides the most reliable evidence on the effectiveness of interventions.

In RCTs, participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. Random assignment means each participant has an equal chance of being placed in any group, which helps ensure that any differences observed between groups are due to the treatment and not to other factors (e.g., age, gender, baseline health status).

For example, in the research of caffeine's effects on sleep, man athletes were randomly assigned to either the caffeine group or the no-caffeine group. This methodology helps isolate the effect of caffeine on sleep duration by controlling for other variables that might influence the outcome.
Group Means Comparison
The comparison of group means is a statistical method used to determine if there are significant differences between the averages (means) of two or more groups. In experiments, this comparison is critical for understanding whether the intervention has an impact on the outcome of interest.

In the context of the caffeine study, researchers calculated the average sleep duration for both the caffeine group and the no-caffeine group. The goal was to compare these averages to see if the consumption of caffeine had any significant effect on how long the athletes slept. When researchers state there is 'no significant difference' in means, they mean that any difference observed is not large or consistent enough to rule out the possibility that it occurred by chance rather than due to the intervention.
Variability in Data
Variability in data refers to how much the data points in a data set differ from each other and from the mean of the data set. High variability means that the data points are spread out over a wider range, while low variability indicates that they are clustered closely around the mean.

Recognizing variability is crucial in experiments as it affects how confidently we can attribute differences (or lack thereof) to the experimental treatment rather than random chance. In the caffeine and sleep study, a lack of significant difference in the mean sleep duration between the caffeine and no-caffeine groups, despite the observed variability, suggests that any differences detected could easily be due to natural fluctuations in sleep patterns among individuals rather than the effect of caffeine itself.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Supervised Exercise Versus Non-Supervised Exercise for Reducing Weight in Obese Adults" (The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness [2009]: \(85-90\) ) describes an experiment in which participants were randomly assigned either to a supervised exercise program or a control group. Those in the control group were told only that they should take measures to lose weight. Those in the supervised exercise group were told they should take measures to lose weight as well, but they also participated in regular supervised exercise sessions. The researchers reported that after 4 months, the mean decrease in body fat was significantly higher for the supervised exercise group than for the control group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the exercise group mean was significantly higher than the control group mean.

The article referenced in the previous exercise also described an experiment in which students at Columbia Business School were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Students in one group were shown a coffee mug and asked how much they would pay for that mug. Students in the second group were given a coffee mug identical to the one shown to the first group and asked how much someone would have to pay to buy it from them. It was reported that the mean value assigned to the mug for the second group was significantly higher than the mean value assigned to the same mug for the first group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the mean value was significantly higher for the group that was given the mug.

The paper "Passenger and Cell Phone Conversations in Simulated Driving" (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied [2008]: \(392-400\) ) describes an experiment that investigated if talking on a cell phone while driving is more distracting than talking with a passenger. Drivers were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The 40 drivers in the cell phone group talked on a cell phone while driving in a simulator. The 40 drivers in the passenger group talked with a passenger in the car while driving in the simulator. The drivers were instructed to exit the highway when they came to a rest stop. Of the drivers talking to a passenger, 21 noticed the rest stop and exited. For the drivers talking on a cell phone, 11 noticed the rest stop and exited. a. Use the given information to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of drivers who would exit at the rest stop. b. Does the interval from Part (a) support the conclusion that drivers using a cell phone are more likely to miss the exit than drivers talking with a passenger? Explain how you used the confidence interval to answer this question.

\( \quad(\mathrm{M} 1, \mathrm{M} 5, \mathrm{M} 6, \mathrm{P} 3)\) "Doctors Praise Device That Aids Ailing Hearts" (Associated Press, November 9,2004 ) is the headline of an article that describes a study of the effectiveness of a fabric device that acts like a support stocking for a weak or damaged heart. In the study, 107 people who consented to treatment were assigned at random to either a standard treatment consisting of drugs or the experimental treatment that consisted of drugs plus surgery to install the stocking. After two years, \(38 \%\) of the 57 patients receiving the stocking had improved, while \(27 \%\) of the patients receiving the standard treatment had improved. Do these data provide evidence that the proportion of patients who improve is significantly higher for the experimental treatment than for the standard treatment? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05

In the paper "Happiness for Sale: Do Experiential Purchases Make Consumers Happier than Material Purchases?" (Journal of Consumer Research [2009]: \(188-197\) ), the authors distinguish between spending money on experiences (such as travel) and spending money on material possessions (such as a car). In an experiment to determine if the type of purchase affects how happy people are after the purchase has been made, 185 college students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The students in the "experiential" group were asked to recall a time when they spent about \(\$ 300\) on an experience. They rated this purchase on three different happiness scales that were then combined into an overall measure of happiness. The students assigned to the "material" group recalled a time that they spent about \(\$ 300\) on an object and rated this purchase in the same manner. The mean happiness score was 5.75 for the experiential group and 5.27 for the material group. Standard deviations and sample sizes were not given in the paper, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that they were as follows: \begin{tabular}{|ll|} \hline Experiential & Material \\ \hline\(n_{1}=92\) & \(n_{2}=93\) \\ \(s_{1}=1.2\) & \(s_{2}=1.5\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Using the following Minitab output, carry out a hypothesis test to determine if these data support the authors' conclusion that, on average, "experiential purchases induced more reported happiness." Use \(\alpha=0.05\) Two-Sample T-Test and Cl Sample \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}\text { ple } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ 1 & 92 & 5.75 & 1.20 & 0.13 \\ 2 & 93 & 5.27 & 1.50 & 0.16\end{array}\) Difference \(=\operatorname{mu}(1)-\operatorname{mu}(2)\) Estimate for difference: 0.480000 \(95 \%\) lower bound for difference: 0.149917 T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs}>): \mathrm{T}\) -Value \(=2.40 \mathrm{P}\) -Value \(=\) \(0.009 \mathrm{DF}=175\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free