Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

14.31 The online article "Death Metal in the Operating Room" (www.npr.org, December 24,2009 ) describes an experiment investigating the effect of playing music during surgery. One conclusion drawn from this experiment was that doctors listening to music that contained vocal elements took more time to complete surgery than doctors listening to music without vocal elements. Suppose that \(\mu_{1}\) denotes the mean time to complete a specific type of surgery for doctors listening to music with vocal elements and \(\mu_{2}\) denotes the mean time for doctors listening to music with no vocal elements. Further suppose that the stated conclusion was based on a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2},\) the difference in treatment means. Which of the following three statements is correct? Explain why you chose this statement. Statement 1: Both endpoints of the confidence interval were negative. Statement 2: The confidence interval included \(0 .\) Statement 3: Both endpoints of the confidence interval were positive.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct statement is Statement 3: Both endpoints of the confidence interval were positive. This is because the conclusion was that doctors listening to music with vocal elements (\(\mu_{1}\)) took longer than doctors listening to music without such elements (\(\mu_{2}\)). Therefore, the difference \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) must be greater than zero, which is only possible if both endpoints of the confidence interval are positive.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing Statements

First, we need to review each of the statements and consider what each statement would imply about the data. If a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means (\(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\)) included 0, then we would not be able to assert that there was a significant difference between the two groups. If both endpoints were positive, it would indicate that \(\mu_{1}\) is greater than \(\mu_{2}\). If both were negative, it would mean that \(\mu_{2}\) is greater than \(\mu_{1}\).
02

Selecting the Correct Statement

Given that the experimental conclusion was that doctors who listened to vocal music took longer (i.e., \(\mu_{1}\) is greater than \(\mu_{2}\)), a confidence interval that reflected this would need to have both endpoints positive. Thus, the correct statement would be Statement 3: Both endpoints of the confidence interval were positive.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article referenced in the previous exercise also described an experiment in which students at Columbia Business School were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Students in one group were shown a coffee mug and asked how much they would pay for that mug. Students in the second group were given a coffee mug identical to the one shown to the first group and asked how much someone would have to pay to buy it from them. It was reported that the mean value assigned to the mug for the second group was significantly higher than the mean value assigned to the same mug for the first group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the mean value was significantly higher for the group that was given the mug.

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA Today, February 2,2010 ) describes a study in which 81 patients ages 13 to 25 who were considered at risk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. Those in the other group took a placebo. After 1 year, \(5 \%\) of those in the fish oil group and \(28 \%\) of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the twosample \(z\) test to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

In the paper "Happiness for Sale: Do Experiential Purchases Make Consumers Happier than Material Purchases?" (Journal of Consumer Research [2009]: \(188-197\) ), the authors distinguish between spending money on experiences (such as travel) and spending money on material possessions (such as a car). In an experiment to determine if the type of purchase affects how happy people are after the purchase has been made, 185 college students were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The students in the "experiential" group were asked to recall a time when they spent about \(\$ 300\) on an experience. They rated this purchase on three different happiness scales that were then combined into an overall measure of happiness. The students assigned to the "material" group recalled a time that they spent about \(\$ 300\) on an object and rated this purchase in the same manner. The mean happiness score was 5.75 for the experiential group and 5.27 for the material group. Standard deviations and sample sizes were not given in the paper, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that they were as follows: \begin{tabular}{|ll|} \hline Experiential & Material \\ \hline\(n_{1}=92\) & \(n_{2}=93\) \\ \(s_{1}=1.2\) & \(s_{2}=1.5\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} Using the following Minitab output, carry out a hypothesis test to determine if these data support the authors' conclusion that, on average, "experiential purchases induced more reported happiness." Use \(\alpha=0.05\) Two-Sample T-Test and Cl Sample \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}\text { ple } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ 1 & 92 & 5.75 & 1.20 & 0.13 \\ 2 & 93 & 5.27 & 1.50 & 0.16\end{array}\) Difference \(=\operatorname{mu}(1)-\operatorname{mu}(2)\) Estimate for difference: 0.480000 \(95 \%\) lower bound for difference: 0.149917 T-Test of difference \(=0(\mathrm{vs}>): \mathrm{T}\) -Value \(=2.40 \mathrm{P}\) -Value \(=\) \(0.009 \mathrm{DF}=175\)

The paper "Fudging the Numbers: Distributing Chocolate Influences Student Evaluations of an Undergraduate Course" (Teaching of Psychology [2007]: \(245-247\) ) describes an experiment in which 98 students at the University of Illinois were assigned at random to one of two groups. All students took a class from the same instructor in the same semester. Students were required to report to an assigned room at a set time to fill out a course evaluation. One group of students reported to a room where they were offered a small bar of chocolate as they entered. The other group reported to a different room where they were not offered chocolate. Summary statistics for the overall course evaluation score are given in the accompanying table. \begin{tabular}{lccc} Group & \(n\) & \(\bar{x}\) & \(s\) \\ Chocolate & 49 & 4.07 & 0.88 \\ No Chocolate & 49 & 3.85 & 0.89 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Use the given information to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference in overall course evaluation score. b. Does the confidence interval from Part (a) support the statement made in the title of the paper? Explain.

The paper "Supervised Exercise Versus Non-Supervised Exercise for Reducing Weight in Obese Adults" (The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness [2009]: \(85-90\) ) describes an experiment in which participants were randomly assigned either to a supervised exercise program or a control group. Those in the control group were told only that they should take measures to lose weight. Those in the supervised exercise group were told they should take measures to lose weight as well, but they also participated in regular supervised exercise sessions. The researchers reported that after 4 months, the mean decrease in body fat was significantly higher for the supervised exercise group than for the control group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the exercise group mean was significantly higher than the control group mean.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free