Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

14.25 Can moving their hands help children learn math? This question was investigated in the paper "Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas About Math" (Psychological Science [2009]\(: 267-272\) ). Eighty-five children in the third and fourth grades who did not answer any questions correctly on a test with six problems of the form \(3+2+8=+8\) were participants in an experiment. The children were randomly assigned to either a no-gesture group or a gesture group. All the children were given a lesson on how to solve problems of this form using the strategy of trying to make both sides of the equation equal. Children in the gesture group were also taught to point to the first two numbers on the left side of the equation with the index and middle finger of one hand and then to point at the blank on the right side of the equation. This gesture was supposed to emphasize that grouping is involved in solving the problem. The children then practiced additional problems of this type. All children were then given a test with six problems to solve, and the number of correct answers was recorded for each child. Summary statistics follow.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The conclusion will depend upon the results of the hypothesis testing phase. If the p-value is less than the significance level (typically 0.05), then there is strong evidence to suggest that using gestures can help children learn math more effectively.

Step by step solution

01

Identifying the data

Begin by identifying and extracting the data values from both the gesture and no-gesture group. This will include the total number, mean, standard deviation, and individual test scores from both groups.
02

Conducting hypothesis test

Carrying out a hypothesis test will provide statistical evidence to suggest if there is a significant difference between the two groups. Set up the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the test results between the gesture and no-gesture group. In contrast, the alternate hypothesis assumes that there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Use a t-test if the data follows a normal distribution and variances are unequal in the two groups.
03

Evaluating test results

After the T statistic and the corresponding P value is calculated, compare the P value with the significance level, often 0.05. If the P value is lower than the significance level, there is strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
04

Drawing conclusions

Depending on the results of the hypothesis test, deduce if gestures have an impact on children learning math. If the null hypothesis is rejected, it suggests that there is a significant difference between the two groups, thus indicating gestures do have an impact on maths learning.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "The Effect of Multitasking on the Grade Performance of Business Students" (Research in Higher Education Journal [2010]: 1-10) describes an experiment in which 62 undergraduate business students were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups. Students in one group were asked to listen to a lecture but were told that they were permitted to use cell phones to send text messages during the lecture. Students in the second group listened to the same lecture but were not permitted to send text messages during the lecture. Afterwards, students in both groups took a quiz on material covered in the lecture. The researchers reported that the mean quiz score for students in the texting group was significantly lower than the mean quiz score for students in the no-texting group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the texting group mean was significantly lower than the no-text group mean. (Hint: See discussion on page 578 )

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA Today, February 2,2010 ) describes a study in which 81 patients ages 13 to 25 who were considered at risk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. Those in the other group took a placebo. After 1 year, \(5 \%\) of those in the fish oil group and \(28 \%\) of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the twosample \(z\) test to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

The article "Why We Fall for This" (AARP Magazine, May/June 2011 ) describes an experiment investigating the effect of money on emotions. In this experiment, students at University of Minnesota were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group counted a stack of dollar bills. The other group counted a stack of blank pieces of paper. After counting, each student placed a finger in very hot water and then reported a discomfort level. It was reported that the mean discomfort level was significantly lower for the group that had counted money. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the money group mean was significantly lower than the blank- paper group mean.

The paper "Matching Faces to Photographs: Poor Performance in Eyewitness Memory" Uournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied [2008]: \(364-372)\) described an experiment to investigate whether people are more likely to recognize a face when they have seen an actor in person than when they have just seen a photograph of the actor. The paper states that there was no significant difference in the proportion of correct identifications for people who saw the actor in person and for those who only saw a photograph of the actor. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that there is no significant difference in the group means.

The article referenced in the previous exercise also described an experiment in which students at Columbia Business School were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Students in one group were shown a coffee mug and asked how much they would pay for that mug. Students in the second group were given a coffee mug identical to the one shown to the first group and asked how much someone would have to pay to buy it from them. It was reported that the mean value assigned to the mug for the second group was significantly higher than the mean value assigned to the same mug for the first group. In the context of this experiment, explain what it means to say that the mean value was significantly higher for the group that was given the mug.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free