Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Head movement evaluations are important because disabled individuals may be able to operate communications aids using head motion. The paper "Constancy of Head Turning Recorded in Healthy Young Humans" (Journal of Biomedical Engineering [2008]\(: 428-436)\) reported the accompanying data on neck rotation (in degrees) both in the clockwise direction (CL) and in the counterclockwise direction (CO) for 14 subjects. For purposes of this exercise, you may assume that the 14 subjects are representative of the population of adult Americans. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that mean neck rotation is greater in the clockwise direction than in the counterclockwise direction? Carry out a hypothesis test using a significance level of 0.01 . $$ \begin{array}{lccccccc} \text { Subject: } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \text { CL: } & 57.9 & 35.7 & 54.5 & 56.8 & 51.1 & 70.8 & 77.3 \\ \text { CO: } & 44.2 & 52.1 & 60.2 & 52.7 & 47.2 & 65.6 & 71.4 \\ \text { Subject: } & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 \\ \text { CL: } & 51.6 & 54.7 & 63.6 & 59.2 & 59.2 & 55.8 & 38.5 \\ \text { CO: } & 48.8 & 53.1 & 66.3 & 59.8 & 47.5 & 64.5 & 34.5 \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the t-score and the critical t-value, it can be determined whether to accept the null hypothesis or reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Depending on the answer, the conclusion would be made if it is reasonable or not that the mean neck rotation is greater in the clockwise direction than in the counterclockwise.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Hypothesis

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the mean neck rotation in the clockwise direction is equal to that in the counterclockwise direction, whereas the alternative hypothesis \(H_1\) posits that the clockwise mean neck rotation is greater than the counterclockwise. So, we have: \(H_0: \mu_{CL} = \mu_{CO}\) \(H_1: \mu_{CL} > \mu_{CO}\) where \(\mu_{CL}\) and \(\mu_{CO}\) are population mean neck rotations in the clockwise and counterclockwise directions, respectively.
02

Calculate Mean and Difference

Calculate the mean rotation in both directions by summing up the rotations and dividing by 14 (total number of subjects). Subsequently, calculate the difference in mean neck rotations.
03

Calculate the standard deviation and Standard Error

Calculate the standard deviation of the differences. Then calculate the Standard Error (SE) by dividing the standard deviation by the square root of the number of samples.
04

Determine the t-score

Using the formula for the t-score in a paired t-test, calculate the t-score. The formula should be \( t = \frac{\bar{d}}{SE} \), where \(\bar{d}\) is the mean difference, and SE is the Standard Error from Step 3.
05

Determine the critical value and compare

Determine the critical t-value for a 0.01 significance level with \( n - 1 \) degrees of freedom. Compare the calculated t-score with the critical t-value. If the t-score is greater than the critical t-value, reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold that determines when we should reject the null hypothesis in a hypothesis test. If the probability of observing the test statistic under the null hypothesis is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis as it suggests that such an extreme value of the test statistic is unlikely to occur just by random chance. In the context of our exercise, a significance level of 0.01 means we have a maximum tolerance of a 1% chance of committing a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis. Establishing such a low significance level reflects the need for a high degree of confidence in the results of the hypothesis test.
Paired t-test
A paired t-test is a statistical method used to compare the means of two related groups. In our exercise, we are comparing neck rotation measurements in two different directions for the same individuals, making it a classic scenario for the paired t-test. This test takes into account that the two samples are not independent and that they are 'paired' because they come from the same individual. The test assesses whether the average difference between the pairs is significantly different from zero. The paired t-test is particularly powerful in 'before and after' studies or studies that measure the effect of a treatment or condition in the same subjects over time.
Population Mean Comparison
Comparing population means is a common objective in statistical analyses, as it allows researchers to determine if there is a significant difference between two or more groups. In our neck rotation exercise, we aim to compare the population mean neck rotations in the clockwise direction \( \mu_{CL} \) with that in the counterclockwise direction \( \mu_{CO} \). The null hypothesis posits that there is no difference between these means, while the alternative hypothesis suggests there is a difference, specifically that the mean in the clockwise direction is greater. The paired t-test will help to determine if the observed difference in sample means reflects a true difference in population means or if it’s likely attributable to random variation.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error (SE) is a measure of how much sample means are expected to vary from the true population mean. It's calculated by dividing the standard deviation of the sample by the square root of the sample size. In other words, SE gives us an understanding of the precision of our sample mean as an estimate of the population mean. For the paired t-test in our exercise, the SE is calculated using the standard deviation of the differences in neck rotations (CL - CO) between pairs. This SE is then used to calculate the t-score, which will tell us how many standard errors the sample mean difference is from zero. A larger t-score indicates a more significant difference between our paired observations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the study described in the paper "Exposure to Diesel Exhaust Induces Changes in EEG in Human Volunteers" (Particle and Fibre Toxicology [2007]), 10 healthy men were exposed to diesel exhaust for 1 hour. A measure of brain activity (called median power frequency, or MPF) was recorded at two different locations in the brain both before and after the diesel exhaust exposure. The resulting data are given in the accompanying table. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of 10 men as representative of healthy adult males. $$ \begin{array}{ccccc} &{\mathrm{MPF}(\operatorname{In} \mathrm{Hz})} \\ { 2 - 5 } \text { Subject } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Location 1 } \\ \text { Before } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Location 1 } \\ \text { After } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Location 2 } \\ \text { Before } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Location 2 } \\ \text { After } \end{array} \\ \hline 1 & 6.4 & 8.0 & 6.9 & 9.4 \\ 2 & 8.7 & 12.6 & 9.5 & 11.2 \\ 3 & 7.4 & 8.4 & 6.7 & 10.2 \\ 4 & 8.7 & 9.0 & 9.0 & 9.6 \\ 5 & 9.8 & 8.4 & 9.7 & 9.2 \\ 6 & 8.9 & 11.0 & 9.0 & 11.9 \\ 7 & 9.3 & 14.4 & 7.9 & 9.1 \\ 8 & 7.4 & 11.3 & 8.3 & 9.3 \\ 9 & 6.6 & 7.1 & 7.2 & 8.0 \\ 10 & 8.9 & 11.2 & 7.4 & 9.1 \end{array} $$ Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean MPF at brain location 1 is higher after diesel exposure than before diesel exposure? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05 .

Some people believe that talking on a cell phone while driving slows reaction time, increasing the risk of accidents. The study described in the paper "A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver" (Human Factors [2006]: \(381-391\) ) investigated the braking reaction time of people driving in a driving simulator. Drivers followed a pace car in the simulator, and when the pace car's brake lights came on, the drivers were supposed to step on the brake. The time between the pace car brake lights coming on and the driver stepping on the brake was measured. Two samples of 40 drivers participated in the study. The 40 people in one sample used a cell phone while driving. The 40 people in the second sample drank a mixture of orange juice and alcohol in an amount calculated to achieve a blood alcohol level of \(0.08 \%\) (a value considered legally drunk in most states). For the cell phone sample, the mean braking reaction time was 779 milliseconds and the standard deviation was 209 milliseconds. For the alcohol sample, the mean breaking reaction time was 849 milliseconds and the standard deviation was \(228 .\) Is there convincing evidence that the mean braking reaction time is different for the population of drivers talking on a cell phone and the population of drivers who have a blood alcohol level of \(0.08 \%\) ? For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the two samples are representative of the two populations of interest.

Research has shown that, for baseball players, good hip range of motion results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (The American Journal of Sports Medicine, \(2010: 383-388\) ) reported on a study of independent samples of 40 professional pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the pitchers, the sample mean hip range of motion was 75.6 degrees and the sample standard deviation was 5.9 degrees, whereas the sample mean and sample standard deviation for position players were 79.6 degrees and 7.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming that the two samples are representative of professional baseball pitchers and position players, test hypotheses appropriate for determining if mean range of motion for pitchers is less than the mean for position players.

The paper referenced in the previous exercise also gave information on calorie content. For the sample of Burger King meal purchases, the mean number of calories was 1,008 , and the standard deviation was \(483 .\) For the sample of McDonald's meal purchases, the mean number of calories was 908 , and the standard deviation was 624 . Based on these samples, is there convincing evidence that the mean number of calories in McDonald's meal purchases is less than the mean number of calories in Burger King meal purchases? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: \(55-76\) ) describes a survey of randomly selected children in grades \(4,5,\) and 6 . The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was -0.83 (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer science classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51 . Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free