Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The paper referenced in the previous exercise also gave information on calorie content. For the sample of Burger King meal purchases, the mean number of calories was 1,008 , and the standard deviation was \(483 .\) For the sample of McDonald's meal purchases, the mean number of calories was 908 , and the standard deviation was 624 . Based on these samples, is there convincing evidence that the mean number of calories in McDonald's meal purchases is less than the mean number of calories in Burger King meal purchases? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The statistical decision will depend on the calculated t-value from step 2 and the rejection region from step 3. Without having the exact sample sizes, this decision cannot be given.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) will be that the mean number of calories in McDonald's meal purchases is equal to or greater than that of Burger King purchases. The Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)) will be that the mean number of calories in McDonald's meal purchases is less than that of Burger King purchases. In mathematical terms, \n Null Hypothesis - \(H_0: \mu_{McDonald} \geq \mu_{BurgerKing}\) \n Alternative Hypothesis - \(H_1: \mu_{McDonald} < \mu_{BurgerKing}\)
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

We use this formula to calculate the test statistic for the two-sample t-test:\n \[ t = \frac {(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - (D_0)} {\sqrt { \frac {s^2_1} {n_1} + \frac {s^2_2} {n_2} } } \] Where: \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means, \(D_0\) is the hypothesized difference between population means, here D_0 = 0, because assuming that both means are equal under the null hypothesis, \(s^2_1\) and \(s^2_2\) are the sample variances, and \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes. The given information will be plugged into this formula to obtain the t-value.
03

Determine the Rejection Region

For a test of significance level \(\alpha=0.01\), since this is a left-tailed test (as we're checking if McDonald's mean is less than Burger King's), we find the critical value from t-distribution table with suitable degrees of freedom. If the calculated t-value is less than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.
04

Make the Statistical Decision

If the calculated t-value from step 2 falls in the Rejection Region determined in step 3, the Null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that there is convincing evidence that the mean number of calories in McDonald's meal purchases is less than the mean number of calories in Burger King meal purchases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-Sample T-Test
The two-sample t-test is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the means of two independent samples. This type of analysis is helpful when comparing groups to see if they come from the same population with regard to the variable being measured.

For example, when comparing the calorie content of meals from two different fast-food chains, a two-sample t-test allows us to evaluate if the observed differences in calories are statistically significant or if they could have occurred by random chance. The t-test uses the means, standard deviations, and sample sizes of both groups to calculate a t-value. Comparing this t-value with a critical value from the t-distribution (considering the desired significance level and the degrees of freedom), we can decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis.

It is important to ensure that the samples are independent of each other and that the data is approximately normally distributed. The test can be two-tailed or one-tailed depending on the alternative hypothesis - in the described exercise, it is a one-tailed test because we are only interested in whether the mean of one group is less than the other.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure of how spread out the values in a data set are around the mean, and it's critical in hypothesis testing to assess variability within each group. A small standard deviation means that the data points are clustered closely around the mean, while a large standard deviation indicates that the data points are spread out over a wider range.

In our exercise, the standard deviations of the meal calories from Burger King and McDonald's are given as 483 and 624 respectively. These values are essential for calculating the standard error of the difference between the two means, which in turn is used to compute the t-value for the two-sample t-test. The standard deviation plays a pivotal role in determining how much we expect our mean to vary if we were to take multiple samples from the population. Understanding standard deviation hence helps us to interpret the results of the t-test and assess the reliability of our data.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In the realm of hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis ( .) states that there is no difference in the variable being tested across groups, and serves as a skeptical assumption that any observed differences are due to random chance. The alternative hypothesis ( .), on the other hand, is the supposition that there is indeed a difference, and the direction of this difference is specified relative to the null hypothesis.

In our scenario, the null hypothesis assumes that there is no difference in calorie content between meals from McDonald's and Burger King, or that McDonald's might even have higher or equal calories. The alternative hypothesis posits that McDonald's meals have fewer calories than Burger King's. The hypothesis test then proceeds to investigate whether the data from the samples support the null hypothesis or if there's sufficient evidence to accept the alternative hypothesis. Establishing these hypotheses before conducting the analysis is a cornerstone of the scientific method and ensures objective testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Plugged In, but Tuned Out" (USA Today, January 20,2010 ) summarizes data from two surveys of kids ages 8 to 18 . One survey was conducted in 1999 and the other was conducted in \(2009 .\) Data on the number of hours per day spent using electronic media, consistent with summary quantities given in the article, are given in the following table (the actual sample sizes for the two surveys were much larger). For purposes of this exercise, assume that the two samples are representative of kids ages 8 to 18 in each of the 2 years the surveys were conducted. Construct and interpret a \(98 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference between the mean number of hours per day spent using electronic media in 2009 and \(1999 .\) $$ \begin{array}{llllllllllllllll} 2009 & 5 & 9 & 5 & 8 & 7 & 6 & 7 & 9 & 7 & 9 & 6 & 9 & 10 & 9 & 8 \\ 1999 & 4 & 5 & 7 & 7 & 5 & 7 & 5 & 6 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 5 & 6 & 6 \end{array} $$

Head movement evaluations are important because disabled individuals may be able to operate communications aids using head motion. The paper "Constancy of Head Turning Recorded in Healthy Young Humans" (Journal of Biomedical Engineering [2008]\(: 428-436)\) reported the accompanying data on neck rotation (in degrees) both in the clockwise direction (CL) and in the counterclockwise direction (CO) for 14 subjects. For purposes of this exercise, you may assume that the 14 subjects are representative of the population of adult Americans. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that mean neck rotation is greater in the clockwise direction than in the counterclockwise direction? Carry out a hypothesis test using a significance level of 0.01 . $$ \begin{array}{lccccccc} \text { Subject: } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \text { CL: } & 57.9 & 35.7 & 54.5 & 56.8 & 51.1 & 70.8 & 77.3 \\ \text { CO: } & 44.2 & 52.1 & 60.2 & 52.7 & 47.2 & 65.6 & 71.4 \\ \text { Subject: } & 8 & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 \\ \text { CL: } & 51.6 & 54.7 & 63.6 & 59.2 & 59.2 & 55.8 & 38.5 \\ \text { CO: } & 48.8 & 53.1 & 66.3 & 59.8 & 47.5 & 64.5 & 34.5 \end{array} $$

Research has shown that, for baseball players, good hip range of motion results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (The American Journal of Sports Medicine, \(2010: 383-388\) ) reported on a study of independent samples of 40 professional pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the pitchers, the sample mean hip range of motion was 75.6 degrees and the sample standard deviation was 5.9 degrees, whereas the sample mean and sample standard deviation for position players were 79.6 degrees and 7.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming that the two samples are representative of professional baseball pitchers and position players, test hypotheses appropriate for determining if mean range of motion for pitchers is less than the mean for position players.

Babies born extremely prematurely run the risk of various neurological problems and tend to have lower IQ and verbal ability scores than babies that are not premature. The article "Premature Babies May Recover Intelligence, Study Says" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, February 12,2003 ) summarized medical research that suggests that the deficits observed at an early age may decrease as children age. Children who were born prematurely were given a test of verbal ability at age 3 and again at age 8 . The test is scaled so that a score of 100 would be average for normal-birth-weight children. Data for 50 children who were born prematurely were used to generate the accompanying Minitab output, where Age 3 represents the verbal ability score at age 3 and Age8 represents the verbal ability score at age \(8 .\) Use the Minitab output to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean verbal ability score for children born prematurely increases between age 3 and age 8 . You can assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of 50 children as a random sample from the population of all children born prematurely. $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Paired T-Test and Cl: Age8, Age3 }\\\ &\begin{array}{l} \text { Paired } T \text { for } \text { Age8 - Age3 } \\ \begin{array}{rrrrr} & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { Se Mean } \\ \text { Age8 } & 50 & 97.21 & 16.97 & 2.40 \\ \text { Age3 } & 50 & 87.30 & 13.84 & 1.96 \\ \text { Difference } & 50 & 9.91 & 22.11 & 3.13 \\ \text { T-Test of mean difference } & =0(\mathrm{vs}>0): \text { T-Value }=3.17 \\ \text { P-Value }=0.001 & & & \end{array} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

The article "More Students Taking AP Tests" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 10,2003 ) provided the following information on the percentage of students in grades 11 and 12 taking one or more AP exams and the percentage of exams that earned credit in 1997 and 2002 for seven high schools on the central coast of California. $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} & {\begin{array}{c} \text { Percentage of } \\ \text { Students Taking } \\ \text { One or More } \\ \text { AP Exams } \end{array}} & & {\begin{array}{c} \text { Percentage of } \\ \text { Exams That } \\ \text { Earned College } \end{array}} \\ { 2 - 3 } { 5 - 6 } & & & & {\text { Credit }} \\ { 2 - 3 } { 5 - 6 } \text { School } & 1997 & 2002 & & 1997 & 2002 \\ & 1 & 13.6 & 18.4 & & 61.4 & 52.8 \\ 2 & 20.7 & 25.9 & & 65.3 & 74.5 \\ 3 & 8.9 & 13.7 & & 65.1 & 72.4 \\ 4 & 17.2 & 22.4 & & 65.9 & 61.9 \\ 5 & 18.3 & 43.5 & & 42.3 & 62.7 \\ 6 & 9.8 & 11.4 & & 60.4 & 53.5 \\ 7 & 15.7 & 17.2 & & 42.9 & 62.2 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that it is reasonable to regard these seven schools as a random sample of high schools located on the central coast of California, carry out an appropriate test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean percentage of exams earning college credit at central coast high schools in 1997 and in 2002 were different. b. Do you think it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the test in Part (a) to all California high schools? Explain. c. Would it be appropriate to use the paired-samples \(t\) test with the data on percentage of students taking one or more AP exams? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free