Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Do male college students spend more time studying than female college students? This was one of the questions investigated by the authors of the paper "An Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Patterns of University Students" (Heath Education Journal \([2010]: 116-125)\). Each student in a random sample of 46 male students at a university in England and each student in a random sample of 38 female students from the same university kept a diary of how he or she spent time over a 3 -week period. For the sample of males, the mean time spent studying per day was 280.0 minutes, and the standard deviation was 160.4 minutes. For the sample of females, the mean time spent studying per day was 184.8 minutes, and the standard deviation was 166.4 minutes. Is there convincing evidence that the mean time male students at this university spend studying is greater than the mean time for female students? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=0.05\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution requires setting up and testing hypotheses. The decision to reject or not reject the null hypothesis is based on comparing the test statistic with the critical value.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Hypotheses

The Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) should be that the mean study time of male students (\(\mu_m\)) equals the mean study time of the female students (\(\mu_f\)). Stated mathematically, \(H_0: \mu_m = \mu_f\). The Alternative Hypothesis(\(H_1\)) states that the mean study time of male students is greater than that of female students. Mathematically, \(H_1: \mu_m > \mu_f\).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic is calculated as \(Z = \frac{(\bar{x}_m - \bar{x}_f) - (\mu_m - \mu_f)}{\sqrt{\frac{S_m^2}{n_m} + \frac{S_f^2}{n_f}}}\), where \(\bar{x}_m\) and \(\bar{x}_f\) are the sample means, \(S_m\) and \(S_f\) are the sample standard deviations, and \(n_m\) and \(n_f\) are the sample sizes. Here \(\mu_m - \mu_f = 0\) under \(H_0\). Substitute the given values to calculate Z.
03

Determine the Critical Value

Given that the significance level \(\alpha = 0.05\) and the alternative hypothesis indicates a right-tailed test, the critical value can be determined using a standard Normal (Z) distribution table which yields approximately 1.645.
04

Make a Decision and Interpret the Result

Compare the test statistic (Z) with the critical value. If \(Z > 1.645\), reject the null hypothesis. This would provide convincing evidence to conclude that the mean study time of male students at the university is greater than that of female students. Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, we begin by stating two contradictory opinions about a population parameter, like a mean or a proportion. These are the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)).

The null hypothesis is a statement of no difference or no effect; it is what we assume to be true before we collect any data. In our exercise, the null hypothesis is that the mean study time for male and female students is the same, mathematically expressed as \(H_0: \mu_m = \mu_f\).

The alternative hypothesis is what you aim to support. It represents an outcome that contradicts the null hypothesis. In our exercise, the alternative hypothesis claims that male students spend more time studying than female students, denoted as \(H_1: \mu_m > \mu_f\).

Testing these hypotheses involves using sample data to determine whether to support the null hypothesis or to consider the alternative hypothesis more credible.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a crucial value derived from sample data, which is compared to a threshold value in order to make a decision about the hypotheses. The test statistic in our example involves the difference in sample means, sample standard deviations, and sample sizes of both male and female student groups.

To find this statistic, use the formula \(Z = \frac{(\bar{x}_m - \bar{x}_f) - (\mu_m - \mu_f)}{\sqrt{\frac{S_m^2}{n_m} + \frac{S_f^2}{n_f}}}\), where \(\bar{x}_m\) and \(\bar{x}_f\) are the sample means for males and females, \(S_m\) and \(S_f\) are the sample standard deviations, and \(n_m\) and \(n_f\) are the sample sizes.

Substitute the given values into this formula to find the Z-score. This calculated Z-score is then compared against a critical value to decide if the null hypothesis should be rejected or not.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure of how spread out numbers are in a dataset. In other words, it's an indication of variability or diversity within a set of values. A lower standard deviation means that most of the numbers are close to the average (mean), while a higher standard deviation indicates that the numbers are more spread out.

In the context of our exercise, two standard deviations are given: one for male students and one for female students. These reflect the variability in daily study times within each group. When we perform hypothesis testing, these standard deviations help calculate the test statistic and ultimately determine whether the observed difference between group means is statistically significant or due to random chance.
Significance Level
The significance level, usually denoted by \(\alpha\), is a threshold we set to decide whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. It's the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true, known as a Type I error.

In this exercise, the significance level is set at 0.05, which is a common choice in many scientific studies. This means there is a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none. To make a decision using this significance level, we compare the test statistic to a critical value from a statistical table based on \(\alpha\). If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the results are statistically significant.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Babies born extremely prematurely run the risk of various neurological problems and tend to have lower IQ and verbal ability scores than babies who are not premature. The article "Premature Babies May Recover Intelligence, Study Says" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, February 12,2003 ) summarized medical research that suggests that the deficit observed at an early age may decrease as children age. Children who were born prematurely were given a test of verbal ability at age 3 and again at age 8 . The test is scaled so that a score of 100 would be average for normal-birth-weight children. Data that are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper for 50 children who were born prematurely were used to generate the accompanying Minitab output, where Age 3 represents the verbal ability score at age 3 and Age8 represents the verbal ability score at age \(8 .\) Use the information in the Minitab output to construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the change in mean verbal ability score from age 3 to age 8 . You can assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of 50 children as a random sample from the population of all children born prematurely. Paired T-Test and Cl: Age8, Age3 Paired \(\mathrm{T}\) for Age8 - Age3 \(\begin{array}{lrrrr} & \mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { Se Mean } \\ \text { Age8 } & 50 & 97.21 & 16.97 & 2.40 \\ \text { Age3 } & 50 & 87.30 & 13.84 & 1.96 \\ \text { Difference } & 50 & 9.91 & 22.11 & 3.13\end{array}\)

The article "More Students Taking AP Tests" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 10,2003 ) provided the following information on the percentage of students in grades 11 and 12 taking one or more AP exams and the percentage of exams that earned credit in 1997 and 2002 for seven high schools on the central coast of California. $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} & {\begin{array}{c} \text { Percentage of } \\ \text { Students Taking } \\ \text { One or More } \\ \text { AP Exams } \end{array}} & & {\begin{array}{c} \text { Percentage of } \\ \text { Exams That } \\ \text { Earned College } \end{array}} \\ { 2 - 3 } { 5 - 6 } & & & & {\text { Credit }} \\ { 2 - 3 } { 5 - 6 } \text { School } & 1997 & 2002 & & 1997 & 2002 \\ & 1 & 13.6 & 18.4 & & 61.4 & 52.8 \\ 2 & 20.7 & 25.9 & & 65.3 & 74.5 \\ 3 & 8.9 & 13.7 & & 65.1 & 72.4 \\ 4 & 17.2 & 22.4 & & 65.9 & 61.9 \\ 5 & 18.3 & 43.5 & & 42.3 & 62.7 \\ 6 & 9.8 & 11.4 & & 60.4 & 53.5 \\ 7 & 15.7 & 17.2 & & 42.9 & 62.2 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that it is reasonable to regard these seven schools as a random sample of high schools located on the central coast of California, carry out an appropriate test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean percentage of exams earning college credit at central coast high schools in 1997 and in 2002 were different. b. Do you think it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the test in Part (a) to all California high schools? Explain. c. Would it be appropriate to use the paired-samples \(t\) test with the data on percentage of students taking one or more AP exams? Explain.

The press release titled "Keeping Score When It Counts: Graduation Rates and Academic Progress Rates" (The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport, March 16,2009 ) gave the 2009 graduation rates for African American basketball players and for white basketball players at every NCAA Division I university with a basketball program. Explain why it is not necessary to use a paired- samples \(t\) test to determine if the 2009 mean graduation rate for African American basketball players differs from the 2009 mean graduation rate for white basketball players for NCAA Division I schools.

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: \(55-76\) ) describes a survey of randomly selected children in grades \(4,5,\) and 6 . The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was -0.83 (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer science classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51 . Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

The paper referenced in the Preview Example of this chapter ("Mood Food: Chocolate and Depressive Symptoms in a Cross-Sectional Analysis," Archives of Internal Medicine [2010]: \(699-703\) ) describes a study that investigated the relationship between depression and chocolate consumption. Participants in the study were 931 adults who were not currently taking medication for depression. These participants were screened for depression using a widely used screening test. The participants were then divided into two samples based on their test score. One sample consisted of people who screened positive for depression, and the other sample consisted of people who did not screen positive for depression. Each of the study participants also completed a food frequency survey. The researchers believed that the two samples were representative of the two populations of interest-adults who would screen positive for depression and adults who would not screen positive. The paper reported that the mean number of servings per month of chocolate for the sample of people that screened positive for depression was 8.39 , and the sample standard deviation was \(14.83 .\) For the sample of people who did not screen positive for depression, the mean was \(5.39,\) and the standard deviation was \(8.76 .\) The paper did not say how many individuals were in each sample, but for the purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the 931 study participants included 311 who screened positive for depression and 620 who did not screen positive. Carry out a hypothesis test to confirm the researchers' conclusion that the mean number of servings of chocolate per month for people who would screen positive for depression is higher than the mean number of chocolate servings per month for people who would not screen positive.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free