Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a study of the effect of college student employment on academic performance, the following summary statistics for GPA were reported for a sample of students who worked and for a sample of students who did not work (University of Central Florida Undergraduate Research Journal, Spring 2005): $$ \begin{array}{cccc} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Size } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Mean } \\ \text { GPA } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Standard } \\ \text { Deviation } \end{array} \\ \begin{array}{c} \text { Students Who Are } \\ \text { Employed } \end{array} & 184 & 3.12 & 0.485 \\ \begin{array}{c} \text { Students Who Are } \\ \text { Not Employed } \end{array} & 114 & 3.23 & 0.524 \\ & & & \end{array} $$ The samples were selected at random from working and nonworking students at the University of Central Florida. Estimate the difference in mean GPA for students at this university who are employed and students who are not employed.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference in the mean GPA for students who are employed and those who are not is -0.11.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Means

From the given data, it can be seen that the Mean GPA of students who are employed (Mean1) is 3.12 and the Mean GPA of students who are not employed (Mean2) is 3.23.
02

Calculate the Difference in Means

Subtract Mean2 from Mean1 using the formula \(difference = Mean1 - Mean2\). This will give the difference in Mean GPA of the two groups.
03

Evaluate the Mean Difference

Subtract \(3.23 (Mean2)\) from \(3.12 (Mean1)\) to get the difference. The difference would be \(3.12 - 3.23 = -0.11\). Therefore, the mean GPA of employed students is 0.11 lower than that of non employed students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean GPA Comparison
When it comes to academic achievement, Grade Point Average (GPA) is a pivotal metric used to assess student performance. Comparing mean GPAs can provide valuable insights into the academic effects of various factors, such as employment status.In the case of the study from the University of Central Florida, researchers aimed to identify any differences in the academic performances between employed and non-employed students by comparing their mean GPAs. The mean GPA is essentially the average score of a group's academic grades, which is calculated by adding all the individual GPAs and dividing by the number of students. Here, employed students had a mean GPA of 3.12, while non-employed students had a slightly higher mean GPA of 3.23.

To determine the impact of employment on academic performance, the difference between these two means was calculated, which revealed that students who were employed had, on average, a 0.11-point lower GPA than their non-employed counterparts. This negative difference suggests that employment might be associated with a slight decline in academic performance. However, it's crucial to consider other possible factors and to understand that correlation does not imply causation without further research.
Standard Deviation
Let's delve into the concept of standard deviation, an essential statistic that measures how spread out the numbers in a data set are. In a real-world scenario like evaluating student GPAs, standard deviation offers insight into the variability of students' grades within each group.Considering our study, the standard deviation for the GPA of employed students was 0.485, whereas the standard deviation for non-employed students was 0.524. These figures indicate that the GPA scores of non-employed students are slightly more spread out than that of employed students, meaning there's more variability in the GPAs of the non-employed group.

Why is this important?

It allows us the ability to understand not just the average performance of students but also the consistency of their grades. A lower standard deviation suggests that the GPAs are closer to the mean, showing a more consistent academic performance. In contrast, a higher standard deviation indicates more diverse outcomes and hence less predictability. By understanding standard deviation, educators and students alike can get a clearer picture of the overall performance landscape.
Sample Size
When analyzing statistics, the significance of a sample size cannot be overstated. The sample size refers to the number of observations or individuals included in a study. It plays a critical role in the reliability of statistical analyses and the validity of the resulting conclusions. Larger sample sizes generally provide more precise estimates of what researchers aim to measure, reducing the margin of error and increasing the confidence in the findings.In the study comparing the GPAs of employed versus non-employed students, the sample sizes were 184 and 114, respectively. The sample size impacts the weight of the evidence provided by the study outcomes. Larger samples are typically better representations of the entire population and are less susceptible to random errors or anomalies.

What does this mean for the study?

Although both sample sizes are relatively modest, the differing sizes could introduce an element of bias or affect the precision of the GPA comparison. Ideally, for robust conclusions, similar sample sizes are preferred, as they ensure a balanced comparison between groups. Nonetheless, the provided sample sizes can still offer important preliminary insights into the relationship between employment and academic performance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Ladies First?" A Field Study of Discrimination in Coffee Shops" (Applied Economics [2008]: 1-19) describes a study in which researchers observed wait times in coffee shops in Boston. Both wait time and gender of the customer were observed. The mean wait time for a sample of 145 male customers was 85.2 seconds. The mean wait time for a sample of 141 female customers was 113.7 seconds. The sample standard deviations (estimated from graphs in the paper) were 50 seconds for the sample of males and 75 seconds for the sample of females. Suppose that these two samples are representative of the populations of wait times for female coffee shop customers and for male coffee shop customers. Is there convincing evidence that the mean wait time differs for males and females? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of 0.05

Research has shown that, for baseball players, good hip range of motion results in improved performance and decreased body stress. The article "Functional Hip Characteristics of Baseball Pitchers and Position Players" (The American Journal of Sports Medicine, \(2010: 383-388\) ) reported on a study of independent samples of 40 professional pitchers and 40 professional position players. For the pitchers, the sample mean hip range of motion was 75.6 degrees and the sample standard deviation was 5.9 degrees, whereas the sample mean and sample standard deviation for position players were 79.6 degrees and 7.6 degrees, respectively. Assuming that the two samples are representative of professional baseball pitchers and position players, test hypotheses appropriate for determining if mean range of motion for pitchers is less than the mean for position players.

The paper referenced in the previous exercise also gave information on calorie content. For the sample of Burger King meal purchases, the mean number of calories was 1,008 , and the standard deviation was \(483 .\) For the sample of McDonald's meal purchases, the mean number of calories was 908 , and the standard deviation was 624 . Based on these samples, is there convincing evidence that the mean number of calories in McDonald's meal purchases is less than the mean number of calories in Burger King meal purchases? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

Example 13.1 looked at a study comparing students who use Facebook and students who do not use Facebook ("Facebook and Academic Performance," Computers in Human Behavior [2010]: \(1237-1245\) ). In addition to asking the students in the samples about GPA, each student was also asked how many hours he or she spent studying each day. The two samples (141 students who were Facebook users and 68 students who were not Facebook users) were independently selected from students at a large, public Midwestern university. Although the samples were not selected at random, they were selected to be representative of the two populations. For the sample of Facebook users, the mean number of hours studied per day was 1.47 hours and the standard deviation was 0.83 hours. For the sample of students who do not use Facebook, the mean was 2.76 hours and the standard deviation was 0.99 hours. Do these sample data provide convincing evidence that the mean time spent studying for Facebook users is less than the mean time spent studying for students who do not use Facebook? Use a significance level of 0.01 .

The article "More Students Taking AP Tests" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 10,2003 ) provided the following information on the percentage of students in grades 11 and 12 taking one or more AP exams and the percentage of exams that earned credit in 1997 and 2002 for seven high schools on the central coast of California. $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} & {\begin{array}{c} \text { Percentage of } \\ \text { Students Taking } \\ \text { One or More } \\ \text { AP Exams } \end{array}} & & {\begin{array}{c} \text { Percentage of } \\ \text { Exams That } \\ \text { Earned College } \end{array}} \\ { 2 - 3 } { 5 - 6 } & & & & {\text { Credit }} \\ { 2 - 3 } { 5 - 6 } \text { School } & 1997 & 2002 & & 1997 & 2002 \\ & 1 & 13.6 & 18.4 & & 61.4 & 52.8 \\ 2 & 20.7 & 25.9 & & 65.3 & 74.5 \\ 3 & 8.9 & 13.7 & & 65.1 & 72.4 \\ 4 & 17.2 & 22.4 & & 65.9 & 61.9 \\ 5 & 18.3 & 43.5 & & 42.3 & 62.7 \\ 6 & 9.8 & 11.4 & & 60.4 & 53.5 \\ 7 & 15.7 & 17.2 & & 42.9 & 62.2 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Assuming that it is reasonable to regard these seven schools as a random sample of high schools located on the central coast of California, carry out an appropriate test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean percentage of exams earning college credit at central coast high schools in 1997 and in 2002 were different. b. Do you think it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the test in Part (a) to all California high schools? Explain. c. Would it be appropriate to use the paired-samples \(t\) test with the data on percentage of students taking one or more AP exams? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free