Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The authors of the paper "Adolescents and MP3 Players: Too Many Risks, Too Few Precautions" (Pediatrics [2009]:e953-e958) concluded that more boys than girls listen to music at high volumes. This conclusion was based on data from independent random samples of 764 Dutch boys and 748 Dutch girls ages 12 to \(19 .\) Of the boys, 397 reported that they almost always listen to music at a high volume setting. Of the girls, 331 reported listening to music at a high volume setting. Do the sample data support the authors' conclusion that the proportion of Dutch boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than this proportion for Dutch girls? Test the relevant hypotheses using a 0.01 significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The sample data supports the authors' conclusion if the calculated p-value is less than or equal to the significance level of 0.01.

Step by step solution

01

State the Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis

The Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the proportion of boys who listen to music at high volume is equal to the proportion of girls. The Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that the proportion of boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than the proportion of girls.
02

Calculate Sample Proportions

The sample proportion of boys (\(p_1\)) who listen to music at high volume is 397 out of 764 and that of girls (\(p_2\)) is 331 out of 748. So, \(p_1 = \frac{397}{764}\) and \(p_2 = \frac{331}{748}\). Calculate these values.
03

Calculate Combined Sample Proportion

The combined sample proportion (\(p\)) is the total number of successes (listening to high volume music) divided by the total number of trials (total number of boys and girls). So, \( p = \frac{(397 + 331)}{(764 + 748)}\). Calculate this value.
04

Test Statistic Calculation

The test statistic (\(Z\)) for testing proportion is calculated using the formula \( Z = \frac{(p_1 - p_2)}{\sqrt{p(1 - p)(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2})}}\), where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes for boys and girls respectively. Plug in the values and calculate the \(Z\) score.
05

Determine the P-Value

To determine if the sample data supports the authors' conclusion, compare the p-value to the significance level. If the p-value ≤ 0.01 significance level, then reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
When conducting hypothesis testing in statistics, researchers seek to determine whether their findings reflect a true effect or whether they are due to chance. This is where the concept of statistical significance comes into play. A result is statistically significant if it is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone, according to a certain threshold, known as the significance level. Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001, which correspond to a 5%, 1%, or 0.1% chance of rejecting the true null hypothesis (a type I error).

In the context of the exercise, using a 0.01 significance level means that there is only a 1% risk that the conclusion reached is incorrect if the null hypothesis is actually true. This stringent level of significance is chosen to ensure that if there is a claim that more boys than girls listen to music at high volumes, it is backed by strong evidence from the data.
Sample Proportions
Sample proportion represents a fraction of the sample with a particular characteristic. It's especially relevant in studies comparing attributes between two different groups. In the exercise, two sample proportions are calculated, one for Dutch boys (\( p_1 \) for boys) and one for Dutch girls (\( p_2 \) for girls), to compare the rates at which they listen to music at high volumes.

To compute each sample proportion, divide the number of individuals with the characteristic by the total number of individuals in that sample. Here, \( p_1 = \frac{397}{764} \) and \( p_2 = \frac{331}{748} \) represent the proportions of boys and girls, respectively, who listen to music at high volumes. These proportions are crucial in hypothesis testing as they serve as estimators for the true population proportions we are interested in comparing.
P-Value
The p-value is a fundamental concept in the field of hypothesis testing designed to measure the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. After calculating the test statistic, the p-value tells us the probability of observing a result as extreme as the one obtained (or more extreme), assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis since it indicates that such an extreme result is less likely to occur simply by chance. If the p-value is less or equal to the significance level (in this case, 0.01), it suggests that the observed data are inconsistent with the null hypothesis, and thus, the null hypothesis should be rejected. In our exercise example, comparing the calculated p-value to the 0.01 threshold will help us draw conclusions about music listening habits among boys and girls.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In hypothesis testing, we set up two opposing statements—the null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) and the alternative hypothesis (\( H_1 \) or \( H_a \)). The null hypothesis represents a position of no effect or no difference, serving as the default assumption. It is what we seek to test against the evidence. The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, embodies the new claim we're testing for—an effect or a difference in a specific direction (greater than, less than, or not equal).

In our study example, the null hypothesis states that there's no difference in the music-listening habits at high volume between boys and girls (\( p_1 = p_2 \)). The alternative hypothesis suggests that there is indeed a difference, specifically that more boys listen to high volumes than girls (\( p_1 > p_2 \)). The testing process involves using data to determine which hypothesis is more likely to be true.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In December 2001 , the Department of Veterans' Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New York Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Persian Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately 1.8 million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a hypothesis test in this situation and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree \(-43 \%\) versus \(25 \% . "\) Suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is greater for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.01 .

The report "Young People Living on the Edge" (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 2008 ) summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 600 young adults (ages 19 to 35 ), and the other sample consisted of 300 parents of young adults ages 19 to \(35 .\) The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support in that situation. When asked about getting married, \(41 \%\) of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and \(43 \%\) of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think their parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different.

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in 2006 , \(20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1,112 Americans ages 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in \(2005,\) only \(15 \%\) reported owning an MP3 player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size 1,112 . a. Are the sample sizes large enough to use the largesample confidence interval for a difference in population proportions? b. Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans ages 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. c. Is zero included in the confidence interval? What does this suggest about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\) d. Interpret the confidence interval in the context of this problem.

Public Agenda conducted a survey of 1,379 parents and 1,342 students in grades \(6-12\) regarding the importance of science and mathematics in the school curriculum (Associated Press, February 15,2006 ). It was reported that \(50 \%\) of students thought that understanding science and having strong math skills are essential for them to succeed in life after school, whereas \(62 \%\) of the parents thought these were essential. The two samples - parents and students- were independently selected random samples. Using a confidence level of \(95 \%\) estimate the difference between the proportion of students who think that understanding science and having math skills are essential and this proportion for parents.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free