Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Common Sense Media surveyed 1,000 teens and 1,000 parents of teens to learn about how teens are using social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace ("Teens Show, Tell Too Much Online," San Francisco Chronicle, August 10,2009 ). The two samples were independently selected and were chosen to be representative of American teens and parents of American teens. When asked if they check online social networking sites more than 10 times a day, 220 of the teens surveyed said yes. When parents of teens were asked if their teen checked networking sites more than 10 times a day, 40 said yes. Use a significance level of 0.01 to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks social networking sites more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who check more than 10 times a day.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, there is convincing evidence at the 0.01 level of significance to suggest that the proportion of all parents who think their teen checks social networking sites more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of all teens who check these sites more than 10 times a day.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is that the proportions are equal, and the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of parents who think their teen checks social networking sites more than 10 times a day is less than the proportion of teens who check more than 10 times a day. So, \n\nNull Hypothesis \(H_0: p1 = p2\), \nAlternative Hypothesis \(H_a: p1 < p2\)
02

Calculate the Proportions and Test Statistic

First, calculate the proportions. For the teens, the proportion \(p1\) is 220 out of 1000, or 0.22. For the parents, the proportion \(p2\) is 40 out of 1000, or 0.04. Now, calculate the pooled proportion \(p\) which is equal to \((x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2)\) = (220 + 40) / (1000 + 1000) = 0.13. Then, calculate the test statistic using the formula for the z score in testing of two proportions: \(z = (p1 - p2) / sqrt [p(1-p)(1/n1 + 1/n2)]\). Substituting the given numbers, our test statistic becomes \(z = (0.22 - 0.04) / sqrt [0.13(1 - 0.13)(1/1000 + 1/1000)] = 15.94.
03

Determine the P-Value and Decision

Use a standard normal distribution (z-distribution) to find the p-value associated with your calculated z-test statistic. In this case, our z-value is so large that the p-value will be effectively 0. Comparing the p-value with our significance level of 0.01, since p-value (0) < \(\alpha\) (0.01), we reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree \(-43 \%\) versus \(25 \% . "\) Suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is greater for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.01 .

The report "Young People Living on the Edge" (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 2008 ) summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 600 young adults (ages 19 to 35 ), and the other sample consisted of 300 parents of young adults ages 19 to \(35 .\) The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support in that situation. When asked about getting married, \(41 \%\) of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and \(43 \%\) of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think their parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different.

A hotel chain is interested in evaluating reservation processes. Guests can reserve a room by using either a telephone system or an online system that is accessed through the hotel's web site. Independent random samples of 80 guests who reserved a room by phone and 60 guests who reserved a room online were selected. Of those who reserved by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the reservation process. Of those who reserved online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is greater for those who reserve a room online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(0.05 .\)

The article "More Teen Drivers See Marijuana as OK; It's a Dangerous Trend (USA Today, February 23,2012 ) describes two surveys of U.S. high school students. One survey was conducted in 2009 and the other was conducted in 2011 . In \(2009,78 \%\) of the people in a representative sample of 2,300 students said marijuana use is very distracting or extremely distracting to their driving. In \(2011,70 \%\) of the people in a representative sample of 2,294 students answered this way. Use the five-step process for estimation problems \(\left(\mathrm{EMC}^{3}\right)\) to construct and interpret a \(99 \%\) large- sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of high school students who believed marijuana was very distracting or extremely distracting in 2009 and this proportion in 2011 .

Public Agenda conducted a survey of 1,379 parents and 1,342 students in grades \(6-12\) regarding the importance of science and mathematics in the school curriculum (Associated Press, February 15,2006 ). It was reported that \(50 \%\) of students thought that understanding science and having strong math skills are essential for them to succeed in life after school, whereas \(62 \%\) of the parents thought these were essential. The two samples - parents and students- were independently selected random samples. Using a confidence level of \(95 \%\) estimate the difference between the proportion of students who think that understanding science and having math skills are essential and this proportion for parents.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free