Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006 ). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn that those without a high school degree \(-43 \%\) versus \(25 \% . "\) Suppose that these percentages were based on random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing a sunburn is greater for college graduates than it is for those without a high school degree? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of 0.01 .

Short Answer

Expert verified
The final conclusion depends on the calculated p-value. If it is less than the alpha level (0.01), it can be concluded that there's a statistically significant evidence that college graduates have a higher proportion experiencing sunburn compared to the group without a high school degree. If the p-value is higher than the alpha level, there's no enough evidence for this conclusion.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the proportions of college graduates and non-high school graduates getting sunburned are the same. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_A\)) is that the proportion of college graduates getting sunburned is higher. So, \(H_0: p1 = p2\) and \(H_A: p1 > p2\) where \(p1\) is for college graduates and \(p2\) for non-high school graduates.
02

Compute the Pooled Sample Proportion

The pooled sample proportion (\(p\)) computes the total number of success events (sunburns) over the total sample size. We need the college graduate sunburn rate (0.43), non-high school graduate sunburn rate (0.25) and the total sample size (400) for this. It is calculated as follows: \(p = (p1 * n1 + p2 * n2) / (n1 + n2)\).
03

Calculate the Standard Error

The standard error (SE) calculates the statistical accuracy of an estimate. It is calculated as follows: \(SE = sqrt{ p * ( 1 - p ) * [ (1/n1) + (1/n2) ] }\).
04

Compute the z-score

The z-score measures the number of standard deviations an element is from the population mean. It is calculated as follows: \(z = (p1 - p2) / SE\).
05

Determine the Probability Associated with Observed z-score

Having computed the z-score, it is necessary to calculate the probability or p-value associated with observed z-score. Use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator which offers functions for this.
06

Draw Conclusion

With the calculated p-value, make a conclusion against the significance level. If the p-value is less than the alpha level (0.01), reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the proportion experiencing sunburn is greater for college graduates. If the p-value is greater than the alpha level, there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men, Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002 ). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm count, compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 nonbikers and that these samples are representative of avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Using a confidence level of \(95 \%,\) estimate the difference between the proportion of avid mountain bikers with low sperm count and the proportion for nonbikers. b. Is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

"Smartest People Often Dumbest About Sunburns" is the headline of an article that appeared in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (July 19,2006\()\). The article states that "those with a college degree reported a higher incidence of sunburn than those without a high school degree-43\% versus \(25 \% . "\) Suppose that these percentages were based on independent random samples of size 200 from each of the two groups of interest (college graduates and those without a high school degree). a. Are the sample sizes large enough to use the largesample confidence interval for a difference in population proportions? b. Estimate the difference in the proportion of people with a college degree who reported sunburn and the corresponding proportion for those without a high school degree using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. c. Is zero included in the confidence interval? What does this suggest about the difference in the two population proportions? d. Interpret the confidence interval in the context of this problem.

Reported that the percentage of U.S. residents living in poverty was \(12.5 \%\) for men and \(15.1 \%\) for women. These percentages were estimates based on data from large representative samples of men and women. Suppose that the sample sizes were 1,200 for men and 1,000 for women. You would like to use the survey data to estimate the difference in the proportion living in poverty for men and women. (Hint: See Example 11.2) a. Answer the four key questions (QSTN) for this problem. What method would you consider based on the answers to these questions? b. Use the five-step process for estimation problems \(\left(\mathrm{EMC}^{3}\right)\) to calculate and interpret a \(90 \%\) large- sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportion living in poverty for men and women.

Public Agenda conducted a survey of 1,379 parents and 1,342 students in grades \(6-12\) regarding the importance of science and mathematics in the school curriculum (Associated Press, February 15,2006 ). It was reported that \(50 \%\) of students thought that understanding science and having strong math skills are essential for them to succeed in life after school, whereas \(62 \%\) of the parents thought these were essential. The two samples - parents and students- were independently selected random samples. Using a confidence level of \(95 \%\) estimate the difference between the proportion of students who think that understanding science and having math skills are essential and this proportion for parents.

The news release referenced in the previous exercise also included data from independent samples of teenage drivers and parents of teenage drivers. In response to a question asking if they approved of laws banning the use of cell phones and texting while driving, \(74 \%\) of the teens surveyed and \(95 \%\) of the parents surveyed said they approved. The sample sizes were not given in the news release, but suppose that 600 teens and 400 parents of teens were surveyed and that these samples are representative of the two populations. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of teens who approve of banning cell phone and texting while driving is less than the proportion of parents of teens who approve? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(0.05 .\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free